程梅, 李黎明, 白向威, 袁梦洋, 袁方方. 急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量敏感指标的构建[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(6): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842
引用本文: 程梅, 李黎明, 白向威, 袁梦洋, 袁方方. 急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量敏感指标的构建[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(6): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842
CHENG Mei, LI Liming, BAI Xiangwei, YUAN Mengyang, YUAN Fangfang. Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(6): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842
Citation: CHENG Mei, LI Liming, BAI Xiangwei, YUAN Mengyang, YUAN Fangfang. Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(6): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842

急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量敏感指标的构建

Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建适用于急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量评价的敏感指标。
    方法 基于“结构-过程-结果”三维质量理论模型, 采用循证护理方法进行证据综合,开展2轮专家函询,确定急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量的敏感指标。
    结果 2轮专家函询问卷的有效回收率分别为100.00%、94.12%; 参与2轮函询专家的判断依据系数(Ca)分别为0.893、0.914, 熟悉程度系数(Cs)分别为0.902、0.921, 权威系数(Cr)分别为0.898、0.918; 第1轮函询专家对一、二、三级指标的肯德尔系数分别为0.212、0.247、0.327, 第2轮函询专家对一、二、三级指标的肯德尔系数分别为0.225、0.349、0.257。最终构建的AAD患者急救护理质量敏感指标包含3个一级指标、8个二级指标、29个三级指标。
    结论 本研究构建的急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量敏感指标,可作为评价急性主动脉夹层患者急救护理质量的依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To establish sensitive indicators for the evaluation of emergency nursing quality in patients with acute aortic dissection.
    Methods Based on the three-dimensional quality theory model of "structure-process-outcome", evidence-based nursing methods were used to synthesize evidence and conduct two rounds of expert consultation to determine sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection.
    Results The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires were 100.00% and 94.12%, respectively. The judgment basis coefficients (Ca) of the experts who participated in the two rounds of consultation were 0.893 and 0.914, respectively, and the familiarity coefficients (Cs) were 0.902 and 0.921, respectively, and the authority coefficients (Cr) were 0.898 and 0.918, respectively. The Kendall coefficients of the first round of consultation experts for the first, second, and third-level indicators were 0.212, 0.247, and 0.327, respectively, and were 0.225, 0.349, and 0.257, respectively in the second round of consultation experts. Finally, the sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing of AAD patients were constructed, including 3 first-level indicators, 8 second-level indicators, and 29 third-level indicators.
    Conclusion The sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing of AAD patients constructed in this study can be used as a basis for evaluating the quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection.

     

/

返回文章
返回