CAI Jing, CHEN Jinping, BAI Xue. Nursing effect of quality control circle activity intervention for abdominal incision of obese puerperas after cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 127-129. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005035
Citation: CAI Jing, CHEN Jinping, BAI Xue. Nursing effect of quality control circle activity intervention for abdominal incision of obese puerperas after cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 127-129. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005035

Nursing effect of quality control circle activity intervention for abdominal incision of obese puerperas after cesarean section

More Information
  • Received Date: September 26, 2019
  • Available Online: August 26, 2020
  • Objective To explore the nursing effect of quality control circle(QCC)activity intervention for class A healing of abdominal incision and complications in obese puerperas after cesarean section. Methods A total of 86 obese pregnant women underwent cesarean section were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 43 cases in each group. The control group was given routine postpartum care, and the observation group was given QCC intervention on the basis of routine postpartum care. The class A healing rates of abdominal incision on the 5th and 10th day after delivery were recorded in both groups, and the healing time of incision and incision-related complications were compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the class A healing rate of abdominal incision on the 5th day after delivery(P>0.05). The class A healing rate of abdominal incision on the 10th day after delivery in the observation group was 90.70%, which was significantly higher than 72.09% in the control group, and the healing time of incision was(7.89 ± 1.65)d in the observation group, which was significantly shorter than(8.74±2.03)d in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of incision-related complications in the observation group was 6.98%, which was significantly lower than 23.26% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion On the basis of routine nursing after cesarean section, QCC intervention can effectively promote the class A healing of abdominal incision and shorten the healing time of incision, and reduce the incidence of incision-related complications.
  • 黎巧, 颜杰文, 韩汝芳, 等. 超重或肥胖产妇相关检测值与剖宫产风险关系的研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2017, 19(9): 16-18.
    刘菊芬, 刘建蒙, 李宏田. 2008—2014中国剖宫产率变化趋势和地区差异研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2017, 51(3): 242-242.
    余瑶. 助产士实践方案对肥胖孕妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017, 23(28): 3646-3648.

    刘彦, 陶俊贤, 吴蔚, 等. 182例产妇身体成分和分娩方式的相关性调查[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(12): 54-57.
    史香芬, 孙志勇, 王肖雲, 等. 品管圈在我院门诊药房退药管理中的应用[J]. 中国药房, 2018, 29(1): 25-28.
    张艳, 耿力, 王亚玲, 等. 品管圈管理在脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢机器人康复训练中的应用[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2017, 39(5): 372-374.
    施晓影. 预见性护理干预在促进肥胖产妇腹部纵切口愈合中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2014, 20(14): 1689-1691.
    袁媛. 品管圈活动在促进肥胖产妇腹部纵切口愈合中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2014, 49(11): 1311-1313.
    谢玉梅, 彭玉英. 产后操联合盆底康复治疗对产后妇女性生活质量的研究[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 79-80.
    王媛. 产后康复操训练对剖宫产产妇产后子宫修复的影响[J]. 临床护理杂志, 2017, 16(6): 43-45.
    邹磊, 任婷, 王杨, 等. 品管圈活动对产妇剖宫产后自护行为的影响[J]. 中国临床研究, 2015, 28(9): 140-142.
    俞巧稚, 俞敏. 剖宫产术后切口脂肪液化影响因素分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2019, 47(8): 797-798.
    陈静, 李奎. 肥胖女性剖宫产术后联合服用头孢氨苄及甲硝唑可降低手术部位感染率[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2018, 21(2): 83-83.
    张国华. 高压氧联合中药加压外敷对肥胖孕妇剖宫产切口脂肪液化的影响[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2018, 25(6): 382-385.
    丛中笑. 基于循环质控理念的护理风险管理降低剖宫产手术切口愈合不良的效果分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017, 23(25): 3257-3260.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAO Yongfeng, GAN Guocai, WANG Xue, ZHAO Xu, MA Shumei, LI Caiqin, ZHANG Cheng. Predictive value of color Doppler ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction induced by gestational hypertension in high-altitude regions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 112-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241944
    [2]XIE Qiong, FENG Hua, LIN Yan, LI Nan. Changes and significance of Doppler flow velocity curve parameters of the main pulmonary artery in fetuses of pregnant women with early-onset severe preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 108-111. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241210
    [3]WANG Yan, ZHOU Shu, YU Ping, YU Jian, ZHANG Ruiqi. Analysis of the relationship between microRNA-15a expression and fetal heart malformation in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(4): 86-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232929
    [4]LIAO Weiwei, FANG Fengkai, XIAO Lizhen, ZHENG Weixiu. Value of ultrasound blood flow parameters in diagnosis of fetal respiratory distress with umbilical cord around the neck[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(21): 131-135. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220818
    [5]LIU Yangyang, YOU Yan, QIN Aiping, MA Min. A case analysis of fetal limb-body wall syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 127-129. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212343
    [6]ZANG Yuezhen, YANG Yangyang, LYU Yuan, ZHANG Mingzhu, ZHU Lingling. Indexes of blood cells analysis and clinical characteristics in premature infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome at different gestational ages[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(1): 69-73. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200938
    [7]LYU Yan, TANG Yanhong, XIE Xiao, MA Yan, YAO Changfang, YE Wenfeng. Early diagnostic value of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery combined with umbilical artery lactic acid and pH detection in diagnosis of fetal distress[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (22): 71-73. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201822023
    [8]LI Yunduan, LIU Weiwu, XU Xiuying. Multivariate analysis of fetal growth restriction and its prevention measures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (1): 90-93. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201701027
    [10]GENG Chun-hui, LIU Hao. Pathological changes of the placenta and its significance in fetal distress[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2012, (11): 141-142,144. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2012.11.050

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return