SHAO Chao, GAO Wencan, ZHANG Jun, SHEN Bin, XU Jianwei, YIN Kai. Establishment of prediction model of deep venous thrombosis formation of lower extremity after general surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(22): 12-15, 19. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221634
Citation: SHAO Chao, GAO Wencan, ZHANG Jun, SHEN Bin, XU Jianwei, YIN Kai. Establishment of prediction model of deep venous thrombosis formation of lower extremity after general surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(22): 12-15, 19. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221634

Establishment of prediction model of deep venous thrombosis formation of lower extremity after general surgery

More Information
  • Received Date: May 22, 2022
  • Available Online: December 01, 2022
  • Objective 

    To investigate the value of thrombelastography (TEG) and conventional coagulation indexes in predicting the formation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities after general surgery, and to establish a prediction model.

    Methods 

    A total of 272 patients undergoing general surgery from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as research objects. According to the postoperative Doppler ultrasound results, they were divided into DVT group (249 cases) and non-DVT group (23 cases). The prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (Fib), D-dimer, coagulation reaction time (R), blood clotting time (K), α-angle and maximum amplitude (MA) were compared between the two groups. The factors related to thrombosis were screened, and Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a prediction model.

    Results 

    The age of patients in the DVT group was significantly higher than that in the non-DVT group (P < 0.05); the operation time of the DVT group was significantly longer than that of the non-DVT group (P < 0.05). The level of D-dimer in the DVT group was significantly higher than that in the non-DVT group (P < 0.05); the preoperative PT, APTT and TT of the DVT group were significantly shorter than those of the non-DVT group (P < 0.05). The preoperative K, α-angle and MA of the DVT group were significantly longer or greater than those of the non-DVT group (P < 0.05); the preoperative R of the DVT group was significantly shorter than that of the non-DVT group (P < 0.05). Preoperative α-angle, MA, K, D-dimer and PT had moderate predictive value for DVT[area under the curve (AUC) was 0.7 to 0.9]. Nine preoperative variables including age, operation time, PT, APTT, TT, D-dimer, R, α-angle (K was not included because of the similar meaning of with α-angle) and MA were included in binary Logistic regression analysis to obtain the prediction model of postoperative thrombosis. The AUC of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the model was 0.964 (95%CI, 0.934 to 0.983, P < 0.05). When the Youden index was the maximum, the corresponding optimal cut-off value was 0.174, the sensitivity was 91.30%, and the specificity was 95.18%.

    Conclusion 

    The prediction model based on 9 preoperative variables including age, operation time, PT, APTT, TT, D-dimer as well as R, α-angle and MA in TEG can better screen high-risk patients with DVT.

  • [1]
    WINTER W E, FLAX S D, HARRIS N S. Coagulation testing in the core laboratory[J]. Lab Med, 2017, 48(4): 295-313. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmx050
    [2]
    GEERTS W H, BERGQVIST D, PINEO G F, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition)[J]. Chest, 2008, 133(6): 381S-453S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0656
    [3]
    HOLLI HALSET J, HANSSEN S W, ESPINOSA A, et al. Tromboelastography: variability and relation to conventional coagulation test in non-bleeding intensive care unit patients[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2015, 15: 28. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0011-2
    [4]
    HENKE P K. Adding thrombodynamic assessment to Caprini risk assessment to improve venous thromboembolism risk specificity[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2020, 8(1): 42-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.08.013
    [5]
    韩博, 任麦芳, 王湘辉, 等. 利伐沙班预防腹腔镜手术后深静脉血栓形成的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(24): 88-91. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202024026
    [6]
    LINKINS L A, TAKACH LAPNER S. Review of D-dimer testing: good, bad, and ugly[J]. Int J Lab Hematol, 2017, 39(Suppl 1): 98-103.
    [7]
    KIRLIKAYA B, LANGRIDGE B, DAVIES A H, et al. Metabolomics as a tool to improve decision making for the vascular surgeon-wishful thinking or a dream come true?[J]. Vascul Pharmacol, 2019, 116: 1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2019.03.005
    [8]
    张翥, 范修才, 刘品刚, 等. 血栓弹力图分析抗血小板药物治疗的冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入后血液高凝状态和缺血事件的价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(21): 43-46. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213934
    [9]
    MOULDER J K, MOORE K J, STRASSLE P D, et al. Effect of length of surgery on the incidence of venous thromboembolism after benign hysterectomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(4): 364. e1-364364. e7.
    [10]
    MAJMUDAR K, QUINTERO L D, FUENTES H E, et al. Postoperative venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with pancreatic surgery[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 120(3): 494-500. doi: 10.1002/jso.25589
    [11]
    MÜSSLE B, BUCK N, SCHADE S, et al. Impact of pulmonary embolism on morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2021, 406(3): 893-902.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 刘倩. 难治性胃食管反流病的中医疗法研究近况. 湖北中医杂志. 2023(11): 63-66 .
    2. 杨超,陈莉丽,杨振斌. 方晓华抑木扶土法临床运用验案举隅. 中国民间疗法. 2022(14): 105-108 .
    3. 郭丽,夏军权,刘晓桐. 难治性胃食管反流病中医药诊治研究进展. 光明中医. 2021(22): 3790-3793 .
    4. 贾军峰,李文萍. 和胃降逆饮联合西药及针刺治疗残胃引起的反流性食管炎的疗效及对血清胃动素的影响. 中国中西医结合消化杂志. 2020(12): 944-948 .
    5. 刘妍. 疏肝降逆汤联合中医特色护理治疗胃食管反流病效果研究. 药品评价. 2019(01): 44-46 .
    6. 马雪梅. 和胃降逆汤加减联合奥美拉唑、枸橼酸莫沙必利治疗肝胃郁热型胃食管反流病的临床观察. 中国民间疗法. 2019(05): 55-56 .
    7. 房晓娜. 和胃降逆汤加减治疗胃食管反流病肝胃郁热型临床观察. 实用中医药杂志. 2019(04): 413-414 .
    8. 邓粉会. 自拟和胃降逆汤辅助西药治疗胃食管反流病相关性支气管哮喘疗效观察. 人人健康. 2019(24): 114-115 .
    9. 黄太伟. 半夏厚朴汤加减治疗难治性胃食管反流病的疗效研究. 实用医技杂志. 2018(06): 625-626 .
    10. 高钟. 泮托拉唑、香砂养胃丸、左金丸联用治疗胃食管反流病的效果观察. 中国社区医师. 2018(19): 102-103 .
    11. 姚向东. 雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利与玄麦甘桔三联用药治疗咽喉反流疾病的临床疗效. 中国合理用药探索. 2018(02): 8-11 .
    12. 王巧凤,王胜业. 和胃降逆汤加减治疗肝胃郁热型胃食管反流病疗效观察. 北方药学. 2018(11): 131 .
    13. 王茜茜,李华岳. 加减乌梅丸方联合穴位针刺对胃食管反流病患者食管动力的影响. 中国中医药现代远程教育. 2018(23): 42-44 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(20)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return