Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation

MAO Yulun; ZHOU Qiang; ZHANG Pingchao

doi:10.7619/jcmp.201417017

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2014 > (17): 59-62. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017

MAO Yulun, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Pingchao. Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017

Citation:

Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation

More Information

Published Date: October 16, 2014

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Obj ective To compare the difference of therapeutic efficacy of autologous and allogenic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive trans-plantation.Methods A total of 70 patients with reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation were selected and divided into autologous group (36 cases)and allogenic group (34 cases).Patients of 2 groups were performed with minimally invasive transplan-tation for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle.Autologous group adopted semitendi-nosus tendon of the inside of ipsilateral limb for transplantation and allogenic group adopted allograft ligaments.The same rehabilitation training was given for 2 groups after transplantation.Results The time of transplantation in autologous group was significantly longer than allogenic group (P<0 .0 1 )but the time of fever and wound healing of autologous group was shorter than allogenic group (P<0.05,or P<0.01).The score of ankle and exopodal,slant angle and migration distance of astragalus significantly improved (P<0.01),but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). After 2 years of follow up,the rate of good efficacy of autologous group was 74.29%and allogenic group was 68 .75%,and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0 .05 ).Conclu-sion Either Autologous tendon or allogenic tendon has advantages and disadvantages in reconstruc-tion of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation,the operation should be selected according to the condition of the patients.

FullText(HTML)

References (16)

References

Hoch M C, Andreatta R D, Mul ineaux D R. Two week joint mobilization intervention improves self reported function, range of motion, and dynamic balance in those with chronic ankle instability [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Re-search, 2012, (11):1798.

Munn J, Sul ivan S J, Schneiders A G. Evidence of sensori-motor deficits in functional ankle instability:a systematic re-view with meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2010(1):2.

FGiannini S, Buda R, Ruffil i A. Arthroscopic autolo-gous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint [J]. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 2014(6):1311.

DiDomenico L A, Cross D J, Giagnacova A. Technique for Utilization of an Interference Screw for Split Peroneus Brevis Tendon Transfer in Lateral Ankle Stabilization [J]. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2014(1):114.

Giza E, Shin E C, Wong S E. Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair of the Lateral Ligament Ankle Complex A Ca-daveric Study [J]. The American journal of sports medicine, 2013, (11):2567.

Jung H G, Kim T H, Park J Y. Anatomic reconstruc-tion of the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments using a semitendinosus tendon al ograft and interference screws [J]. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 2012(8):1432.

Prisk V R, Imhauser C W, O'Loughlin P F. Lateral ligament repair and reconstruction restore neither contact me-chanics of the ankle joint nor motion patterns of the hindfoot [J]. The Journal of Bone&Joint Surgery, 2010, (14):2375.

Ahn J H, Choy W S, Kim H Y. Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligament with a long extensor tendon graft of the fourth toe [J]. The American journal of sports medicine, 2011(3):637.

Hua Y, Chen S, Jin Y. Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle with semitendinosus al o-graft [J]. International orthopaedics, 2012, (10):2027.

Youn H, Kim Y S, Lee J. Percutaneous lateral liga-ment reconstruction with al ograft for chronic lateral ankle in-stability [J]. Foot&Ankle International, 2012(2):99.

胡牧, 徐向阳, 刘津浩. 自体与异体肌腱微创重建踝关节外侧韧带的临床对比研究 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2014(4):448.

鲍立峰. 半腱肌移植微创治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳 [J]. 中医正骨, 2012, (11):50.

张振宇, 毕龙, 宋扬. 半腱肌移植重建踝关节外侧副韧带及踝关节不稳 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2010, (10):1082.

Nú ez-Pereira S, Pacha-Vicente D, Llusá-Pé rez M. Tendon transfer fixation in the foot and ankle:a biome-chanical study [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, (12):1207.

赵立来, 徐向阳, 刘津浩. 自体半腱肌肌腱结合界面螺钉修复慢性踝关节外侧副韧带损伤 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2011(9):959.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.09.008.

王培, 闫洪伟, 李哲. 踝关节外侧副韧带损伤1 7例:锚钉与同种异体肌腱修补重建 [J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010(9):1621.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	刘娟，王凤兰. 川崎病患儿冠状动脉病变的影响因素分析及预测模型构建. 国际医药卫生导报. 2025(01): 60-65 .
2.	刘威，张兰. 婴儿川崎病冠状动脉病变的临床特点及危险因素分析. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2025(01): 38-40+45 .
3.	徐树红，姜军. 川崎病患儿冠脉病变发生的危险因素模型构建及分析. 医学理论与实践. 2024(13): 2290-2292 .
4.	张春燕. 白细胞介素-6/白蛋白比值与川崎病患儿冠状动脉损害的相关性研究. 中国实用医刊. 2023(11): 16-20 .
5.	高健，陈雨青. 川崎病患儿发生血管损伤的影响因素. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志. 2023(07): 846-849+863 .
6.	田慧，郝晓燕，祁洁，李莉，郭瑞霞，尉志红. 儿童川崎病的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志. 2023(17): 3278-3280 .
7.	张惠，张晓斌，陈俊义. 川崎病患儿急性期血脂水平与冠脉病变关系的研究. 中国卫生标准管理. 2023(24): 23-27 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

XML

Article views (241) PDF downloads (9) Cited by(9)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content