Advance Search
WEI Shuyi, LI Tongxiang. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 87-90. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907023
Citation: WEI Shuyi, LI Tongxiang. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 87-90. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907023
shu

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture

  • The Second Department of Orthopedics, Yibin First People′s Hospital, Yibin, Sichuan, 644000

More Information
  • Received Date: December 08, 2018
  • Accepted Date: February 06, 2019
  • Available Online: September 09, 2020
  • Published Date: April 14, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture.
      Methods  Totally 90 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the PFNA group received PFNA, and patients in locking plate group were treated with internal fixation of locking plate. Perioperative indicators, complications, the Harris score and long-term prognosis were compared between the two groups.
      Results  The operation time, length of incision, intra-operative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, time to walking and fracture healing time in the PFNA group were significantly better than those in the locking plate group (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The total score of Harris, physical function, physical pain and overall health score at final follow up in the PFNA group were significantly higher than those in locking plate group (P < 0.01). The total incidence rate of complications in the PFNA group was significantly lower than that in the locking plate group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  PFNA has less trauma, faster recovery speed and fewer complications when compared with internal fixation with locking plate.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    周明昊, 吕建军, 谢威, 等. 锁定钢板和PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J]. 安徽医药, 2013, 17(1): 78-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2013.01.032
    [2]
    谢仲燊, 林秋喜, 黄超. 两种内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2014, 20(5): 461-463. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201405026.htm
    [3]
    Li J, Cheng L, Jing J. The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(2): 143-146. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.011
    [4]
    胡明云. 老年人股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗进展[J]. 海南医学, 2011, 22(9): 119-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2011.09.054
    [5]
    曹剑, 王永安, 达赖, 等. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者不同内固定方法的疗效[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012, 32(6): 1295-1296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2012.06.096
    [6]
    胡彩平, 林毅, 李秋萍, 等. SF-36量表与QLQ-C30量表在老年癌症病人生活质量评估中的应用及其相关性研究[J]. 护理研究, 2015, 29(24): 2968-2972. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2015.24.008
    [7]
    高金华, 王明洋, 顾文浩, 等. 经皮撬拨复位PFNA内固定和股骨近端解剖锁定板内固定治疗老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2017, 32(6): 619-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201706019.htm
    [8]
    任国旗, 廖宏伟, 钱永刚. 解剖型锁定钢板与PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折回顾性分析[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2013, 40(10): 68-70. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-4756.2013.10.032
    [9]
    吴椰明, 赵海燕, 刘海生. 股骨近端锁定钢板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2016, 45(12): 1432-1433. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXYY201612028.htm
    [10]
    马健, 杨明贵, 段政, 等. 股骨近端锁定钢板、PFNA和人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2013, 28(8): 762-763. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201308027.htm
    [11]
    赵杰, 滕磊, 丰荣杰. 股骨近端抗旋髓内钉内固定术治疗老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2016, 56(42): 62-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2016.42.021
    [12]
    Hélin M, Pelissier A, Boyer P, et al. Does the PFNA nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture A 115 case-control series[J]. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 2015, 101(1): 45-49. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056814003508
    [13]
    张新颖, 秦汉兴. PFNA与LPFP治疗老年不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折的对比分析[J]. 广西医学, 2015, 37(1): 115-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX201501046.htm
    [14]
    贾真, 林涨源. PFNA与ALP内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2016, 31(6): 581-584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201606007.htm
    [15]
    王强, 田锋, 朱瑞罡, 等. DHS、PFNA、LCP治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 山东医药, 2011, 51(49): 107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2011.49.068
    [16]
    Makki D, Matar H E, Jacob N, et al. Comparison of the reconstruction trochanteric antigrade nail (TAN) with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(12): 2389-2393. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.038
    [17]
    罗东斌, 张永, 汤永南, 等. 双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(6): 1413-1415. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2016.06.062
    [18]
    冯硕, 查国春, 郭开今, 等. 肱骨近端三、四部分骨折治疗: 半肩关节置换与锁定钢板对比[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(19): 2974-2980. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0228
    [19]
    李烨, 焦竞, 汤洁, 等. 甲状旁腺激素(1-34)对老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折术后影响的临床研究[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2018, 24(1): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2018.01.010
    [20]
    王昌刚, 韦泽进, 廖正许, 等. 有限切开复位、锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨中上段、长斜形骨折的临床体会[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(z2): 156-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAYX2016S1070.htm
    [21]
    永峰, 胡南松, 吕伟胜. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的效果分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(2): 262-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC201902035.htm
    [22]
    黄伟彦, 彭杰威, 万明, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉、锁定加压钢板、动力髋螺钉、Gamma钉4种内固定方式治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(12): 1846-1852. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1122
    [23]
    李鹏飞. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉和解剖锁定钢板治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床效果比较[J]. 临床研究, 2019, 27(2): 58-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2019.02.014
    [24]
    王瑞林. 动力髋螺钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗外侧壁危险型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床对比研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(2): 282-284. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC201902048.htm
    [25]
    徐亚斌. PFNA内固定术与DHS应用于高龄股骨粗隆间骨折治疗中疗效对比[J]. 中外医疗, 2018, 37(34): 71-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZZZ201834025.htm
    [26]
    唐胜斌. TANG Sheng-bin. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉小切口治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果和安全性分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2019, 33(1): 49-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2019.01.013
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHOU Gaojin, SHANG Liqing, YAN Jun. Molecular mechanism of long non-coding RNA titin antisense RNA 1 regulating microRNA-134-5p/epidermal growth factor receptor axis in breast cancer cell glycolysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 62-68. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244586
    [2]XU Hexi, SONG Hongqi, LIU Dianwen, LIU Shiju, YANG Huiju. Effect of silencing E26 transformation-specific sequence 4 on proliferation and migration of colon cancer cells by inhibiting nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(2): 38-41,47. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243267
    [3]ZHANG Jing, MAO Ying. Value of combined assessment of serum transforming growth factor-β1, interleukin-6, toll-like receptor-4, and nuclear factor-κb in evaluating the severity of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(14): 12-17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20234065
    [4]SHEN Yongjing, DU Baojing, SHANG Jingmin, HAN Bing, MIAO Yuanmin. Effect of toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor κB p65 pathway on liver damage in children with rotavirus enteritis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(7): 63-66. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240098
    [5]Kabinuer·ALIMASI, CHEN Hailin, Aishanjiang·MUHETAER, Maimaitirexiati·SUPAJI, WU Chunping, Anniwaer·MAIMAITI. Effect of long non-coding RNA SLCO4A1-AS1 targeting microRNA-615-5p on the proliferation, apoptosis and inflammatory factors expression in esophageal cancer cells[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 13-19. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233173
    [6]QIN Yilu, BIAN Caiyue, ZUO Shufei, WU Jie, LIANG Shu, XU Zhendan, FAN Wenqiang. Effect of microRNA-106a-5p/colony stimulating factor 1 axis on immunoglobulin G induced podocyte injury in patients with lupus nephritis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(20): 48-53, 58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231527
    [7]QIN Lei, QIN Xin. Myeloid differentiation factor 88 regulates the proliferation, migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through the nuclear factor-κB/activator protein-1 signaling pathway[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(14): 40-45. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20223737
    [8]BAI Yunyun, CHEN Fuquan, QIAO Yanming. Roles of microRNA-150-5p in inhibiting malignant proliferation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and enhancing radiosensitivity[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 76-81. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222993
    [9]MO Zhisheng, XU Peiqing, LI Huanyu, HUA Guotian, CHENG Daiwei, HU Ziran. Analysis in mechanism of tradition Chinese medicine for tonifying kidney, activating blood circulation and removing dampness in treatment of knee osteoarthritis based on nuclear factor-κB signal pathway[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(11): 87-93, 99. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220631
    [10]SHEN Xiaoli, ZHUANG Xueming, QIAN Mengshu, MA Weixiong, CHEN Yueyang, LU Chaoming, FANG Xutao, WANG Shibo. MicroRNA-182-5p regulates the MAPK/NF-κB pathway by targeting MAPK1 to treat acute lung injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(5): 79-85. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214224

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 韩维静，赵伟涛，张帅通. 冰冻切片病理诊断在甲状腺微小乳头状癌术中应用体会. 延边大学医学学报. 2025(01): 52-54 .
    2. 余萱玺，龙秀荣，张学平. 术中冰冻切片检查用于甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断中的准确性分析. 生命科学仪器. 2024(01): 165-167 .
    3. 刘建，张立英，贾兴东，冯艳玉. 甲状腺癌冰冻切片病理不能明确诊断的临床因素分析. 中国现代医生. 2024(18): 38-42 .
    4. 李军，许研，卓倩. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌的术中冰冻病理诊断探讨. 系统医学. 2024(10): 46-48 .
    5. 毛左乾. 术中冰冻切片病理检查诊断甲状腺微小癌的价值分析. 中国社区医师. 2024(16): 86-88 .
    6. 齐彬，栗玉娇，周平安，张翔. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌术中冰冻切片病理诊断准确性分析. 系统医学. 2024(18): 167-169+198 .
    7. 莫林，韩泽贤，欧范妍，梁业志，韦康来. 术中快速冰冻病理切片检查在诊断甲状腺结节中的应用效果. 医药前沿. 2024(20): 47-49 .
    8. 赖丽雅，廖志东，卢裕，郑渝兰，钟伟樑. 甲状腺乳头状增生与甲状腺乳头状癌术中冰冻切片与石蜡切片病理诊断结果的对比分析. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2024(22): 2162-2166 .
    9. 张檑，张玲，王义龙. 病理切片机在甲状腺癌手术患者病理检查中的应用及可信性分析研究. 现代仪器与医疗. 2023(01): 29-32 .
    10. 崔小光，陈昌伟. 冰冻切片对甲状腺微小乳头状癌术中病理诊断的准确性及价值. 中国卫生标准管理. 2023(04): 110-113 .
    11. 王惠国. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断中术中冰冻病理的应用价值体会. 中国实用医药. 2023(09): 96-98 .
    12. 段鸿梅，蔡为民，盛仁明，周燕芳. 术中冰冻病理检查对甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断的准确率分析. 系统医学. 2023(02): 46-49 .
    13. 罗燕. 冰冻病理技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的效果分析. 现代诊断与治疗. 2023(11): 1688-1690 .
    14. 杨晓波，李俊，张爱兵. 术中冰冻切片技术诊断甲状腺乳头状癌的价值. 系统医学. 2023(14): 171-173 .
    15. 许研. 甲状腺冰冻与石蜡切片的病理诊断价值观察. 中国医药指南. 2022(04): 74-76+80 .
    16. 刘军. 卵巢肿瘤术中冰冻切片的病理诊断分析及临床价值. 中国卫生标准管理. 2022(03): 183-186 .
    17. 孟峰芳. 甲状腺冰冻切片病理检查在鉴别其良恶性价值中的应用. 中国卫生标准管理. 2022(07): 73-75 .
    18. 王超柱，付冬妍. 冰冻切片对甲状腺微小癌术中病理诊断的准确性及漏诊率、误诊率分析. 中国医药科学. 2022(15): 182-185 .
    19. 李晓，曹卓，李明显，刘红英，黄镇栋，郑广娟，何青莲. 一种生物色标在冰余石蜡制片中的应用体会. 临床与实验病理学杂志. 2022(09): 1141-1142 .
    20. 李明显，周娜，郑细闰，杜晓华，李晓，郑广娟，何青莲，汤丽鹏. 一种红色标签纸在甲状腺小病灶冰冻切片过程中的应用体会. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2022(06): 748-750 .
    21. 李轩飞，张静文. 术中冰冻切片与术后石蜡切片对PTMC病理诊断的效果分析. 菏泽医学专科学校学报. 2022(04): 26-29+33 .
    22. 徐鹏育. 术中冰冻切片病理诊断甲状腺微小乳头状癌的价值. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(30): 107-109 .
    23. 陈海敏，江沂，刘婉，江桂英. 甲状腺良恶性鉴别中应用冰冻切片及石蜡切片病理检查的价值. 人人健康. 2021(08): 66-67 .
    24. 成瑶. 术中快速冰冻切片在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用分析. 临床医学工程. 2021(05): 651-652 .
    25. 杨丽英，闵文，朱杰，谭永兴. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌术中冰冻切片病理诊断的准确性及相关影响因素. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(31): 36-38 .
    26. 张宏岩. 术中冰冻切片病理诊断在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中的应用价值. 中国实用医药. 2021(31): 202-204 .
    27. 刘爽，宋秀平，周宝华. 甲状腺冰冻切片与石蜡切片的病理诊断价值比较. 当代医学. 2021(34): 143-144 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (278) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(27)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return