Advance Search
YIN Yuan, LUO Qing. Painless colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for incidence rate of intestinal perforation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(10): 69-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201910019
Citation: YIN Yuan, LUO Qing. Painless colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for incidence rate of intestinal perforation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(10): 69-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201910019
shu

Painless colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for incidence rate of intestinal perforation

  • 1.

    Department of Gastroenterology, Chengdu 363 Hospital of Aviation Industry of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072

  • 2.

    Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu 363 Hospital of Aviation Industry of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072

More Information
  • Received Date: March 12, 2019
  • Accepted Date: April 22, 2019
  • Available Online: February 22, 2021
  • Published Date: May 27, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the effect of painless colonoscopy and common colonoscopy on the incidence rate of intestinal perforation.
      Methods  Totally 116 patients with colonoscopy examination were divided into observation group (n=58) with painless colonoscopy and control group (n=58) with conventional colonoscopy according to coin tossing method. The clinical effect and incidence rate of intestinal perforation were compared between the two groups.
      Results  Before the examination, there were no significant differences in vital signs and oxygen saturation between the two groups (P>0.05). During the examination, the vital signs of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in oxygen saturation and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence rate of intestinal perforation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Satisfaction degree of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Painless colonoscopy has less influence on the vital signs of patients and a higher satisfaction degree during clinical application, but the incidence rate of intestinal perforation is higher than that of conventional colonoscopy.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (14)
  • [1]
    杨柳, 曹殿青, 郑荣, 等. 右美托咪定混合丙泊酚在门诊无痛肠镜中的应用[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(23): 3601-3603. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2016.23.037
    [2]
    Rodrigues J P, Pinho R, Proenca L, et al. Stenosis of Hepaticojejunal Anastomosis with Intrahepatic Lithiasis: Treatment with Single-Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP[J]. GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2018, 25(3): 160-162. doi: 10.1159/000484251
    [3]
    肖凌燕. 右美托咪定复合异丙酚麻醉用于老年无痛肠镜的适宜剂量[J]. 武警后勤学院学报: 医学版, 2016, 25(9): 742-743. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WUXB201609014.htm
    [4]
    张天明, 杜金林, 钟志风, 等. 腹腔镜经肛门柱状切除术在低位直肠癌的临床运用价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 47-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201801016.htm
    [5]
    罗佳艳, 古学东, 古小平, 等. 右美托咪定联合芬太尼和丙泊酚在高血压患者无痛肠镜中的应用[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2018, 41(4): 334-338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2018.04.010
    [6]
    李河洲, 马毅, 谢玉华, 等. 经脐入路内镜手术在肠穿孔修补中应用[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学, 2018, 6(5): 281-282. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJB201805007.htm
    [7]
    曹静, 李雁飞. 老年病人无痛肠镜检查中逆向穿刺静脉留置针的临床应用[J]. 实用老年医学, 2017, 31(7): 691-693. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYLA201707029.htm
    [8]
    叶伟恒, 梁俊杰, 董高宏, 等. 腹腔镜诊治自发性乙状结肠穿孔1例报告[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(7): 558-560. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201807026.htm
    [9]
    谢江平, 刘刚. 肠穿孔术后并发嵌顿性腹股沟疝一例[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志: 电子版, 2018, 12(2): 160-160. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.02.023
    [10]
    Blanco-Velasco G, Hernández-Mondragón O V, Blancas-Valencia J M, et al. Safety and efficacy of small bowel polypectomy using a balloon-assisted enteroscope in pediatric patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome[J]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 2018, 83(3): 234-237. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29449094
    [11]
    柏愚, 杨帆, 马丹, 等. 中国早期结直肠癌筛查及内镜诊治指南(2014年, 北京)[J]. 胃肠病学, 2015, 20(6): 345-365. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7125.2015.06.006
    [12]
    王伟杰, 朱建军, 毛芳. 内镜检查导致消化道穿孔的原因分析及经验总结[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2018, 16(1): 87-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYL201801031.htm
    [13]
    周燕, 虎金朋, 莫丽蓉, 等. 医源性结肠穿孔原因分析及处理措施[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2018, 5(2): 78-80. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2018.02.007
    [14]
    李彩霞, 张光明, 李烜. 小剂量羟考酮复合丙泊酚在老年无痛肠镜中的应用观察[J]. 中国医学工程, 2017, 25(7): 60-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YCGC201707017.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 金珍琳，金婷，庄强. 艾曲泊帕治疗原发免疫性血小板减少症患者的回顾性研究. 中国现代医生. 2024(11): 69-72 .
    2. 马丽，包萃华. TPO受体激动剂在难治性原发免疫性血小板减少症中的研究进展. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2024(07): 927-930+934 .
    3. 李亮，卞建军，苏玉璇，沈磊，傅磊. 海曲泊帕乙醇胺片联合环孢素A治疗难治性免疫性血小板减少症的临床疗效及安全性. 现代生物医学进展. 2024(24): 4695-4699 .
    4. 袁文志. 艾曲泊帕联合环孢素治疗原发性血小板减少症的临床疗效分析. 中外医疗. 2024(34): 82-85 .
    5. 梅婷，孙小力，齐淑静，魏广祎. 自拟益气健脾解毒化瘀方联合艾曲泊帕治疗恶性肿瘤化疗相关性血小板减少症的临床效果. 临床误诊误治. 2023(06): 138-142 .
    6. 胡星月，赵彤，张思源，乐丽霞，宋朋飞，李洁. 联合用药治疗成人原发免疫性血小板减少症. 中国医药科学. 2023(14): 45-48+85 .
    7. 张潇，回广飞，任天舒，许子华，周春娟，王艳帅，赵俭. 异基因造血干细胞移植患者环孢素血药浓度及影响因素分析. 临床军医杂志. 2022(09): 926-929 .
    8. 周林，禹红，万敏，刘毓玲，段波，王进军. 芪黄汤对免疫性血小板减少症小鼠作用机制研究. 临床军医杂志. 2022(09): 975-977 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (300) PDF downloads (13) Cited by(9)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return