YU Hongzhi, ZHANG Liang, TAO Yuping, FENG Xinmin. Effect comparison of vertebroplasty with bone cement of different viscosity for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 73-78. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911021
Citation: YU Hongzhi, ZHANG Liang, TAO Yuping, FENG Xinmin. Effect comparison of vertebroplasty with bone cement of different viscosity for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 73-78. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911021

Effect comparison of vertebroplasty with bone cement of different viscosity for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis

More Information
  • Received Date: March 17, 2019
  • Accepted Date: April 24, 2019
  • Available Online: February 22, 2021
  • Published Date: June 14, 2019
  •   Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of high- and low-viscosity cement percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of vertebral osteonecrosis and its complications.
      Methods  Thirty-two patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral osteonecrosis were randomly assigned into high-viscosity group(n=15) and low-viscosity group(n=17). Intraoperative X-ray times, operative time and volume of bone cement injection were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36), and radiographic measurement were performed to assess waist-back pain, waist-back function and life quality, relative height of injured vertebrae(%) and its kyphotic angle, respectively. Incidence of complications such as bone cement leakage and vertebral fractures in adjacent segments were observed.
      Results  The patients in both groups had smooth operation and completed follow-up for at least 12 months. There was no significant difference in the general data, intraoperative X-ray times, operation time and volume of bone cement injection between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant improvement on the VAS, ODI scores, SF-36 score, vertebral height (%) and kyphosis Cobb′s angle were noted in each group compared with treatment before. However, there were no significant differences in the same postoperative time between the 2 groups and at varied time points intra-group(P>0.05). Postoperative X-ray assessment identified cement leakage occurred in 5 vertebrae(33.3%) in high viscosity group, and all of them were intraspinal leakage, while high-viscosity cement group had 10 vertebrae leakage(58.8%), among which 8 was intraspinal leakage, 2 was vertebral side leakage. There were significant differences between the two groups in cement leakage rate(P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  PVP used in osteoporotic vertebral osteonecrosis has better clinical efficacy, which can significantly relieve back pain, improve lower back function and quality of life. Furthermore, high-viscosity cement can reduce the cement leakage rate and greatly enhance operative safety.
  • [1]
    D′Oria S, Delvecchio C, Dibenedetto M, et al. Case report of Kummell's disease with delayed onset myelopathy and the literature review[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018, 28(2): 309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2039-0
    [2]
    Kümmell H. Die rarefizierende Ostitis der Wirbelkorper[J]. Deutsche Med, 1985, 21(1): 180-181.
    [3]
    Zha L L, Tong P J, Xia L W, et al. Diagnostic analysis of the radiologic characteristics in osteoporotic Kiinmmel's disease[J]. Zhongguo gu shang, 2016, 29(5): 460-463. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97146X/201605/669161204.html
    [4]
    Hur W, Choi S S, Lee M, et al. Spontaneous vertebral reduction during the procedure of kyphoplasty in a patient with kummell's disease[J]. Korean J Pain, 2011, 24(4): 231-234. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.231
    [5]
    Matzaroglou C, Georgiou C S, Panagopoulos A, et al. Kümmell's disease: clarifying the mechanisms and patients′inclusion criteria[J]. Open Orthop J, 2014, 8: 288-297. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010288
    [6]
    Liu F J, Chen Z Z, Lou C, et al. Anterior reconstruction versus posterior osteotomy in treating Kümmell's disease with neurological deficits: A systematic review[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2018, 52(4): 283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.05.002
    [7]
    黄吉军, 冯新民, 杨建东, 等. 内固定联合椎体成形治疗Ⅲ型Kummell病疗效观察[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2016, 22(3): 198-200, 224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201603003.htm
    [8]
    Yang H L, Pan J, Wang G L. A review of osteoporotic vertebral fracture nonunion management[J]. Spine, 2014, 39(26): B4-B6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25504096
    [9]
    王根林, 杨惠林, 姜为民, 等. 球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折后骨坏死[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(8): 593-596. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2010.08.010
    [10]
    Ding J, Zhang Q, Zhu J F, et al. Risk factors for predicting cement leakage following percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(11): 3411-3417. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3923-0
    [11]
    Rothermich M A, Buchowski J M, Bumpass D B, et al. Pulmonary cement embolization after vertebroplasty requiring pulmonary wedge resection[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(5): 1652-1657. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3506-0
    [12]
    D′Oria S, Delvecchio C, Dibenedetto M, et al. Case report of Kummell′s disease with delayed onset myelopathy and the literature review[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018, 28(2): 309-316. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2039-0
    [13]
    Wu C C, Lin M H, Yang S H, et al. Surgical removal of extravasated epidural and neuroforaminal polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty in the thoracic spine[J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(Suppl 3): 326-331. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2148084
    [14]
    陈涛, 杨建东, 张亮, 等. 骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折椎体强化术后发生邻近椎体骨折的危险因素分析[J]. 骨科, 2017, 8(3): 190-193, 199. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2017.03.007
    [15]
    Zhang L, Wang J C, Feng X M, et al. A comparison of high viscosity bone cement and low viscosity bone cement vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 129: 10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.11.018
    [16]
    Baroud G, Crookshank M, Bohner M. High-viscosity cement significantly enhances uniformity of cement filling in vertebroplasty: an experimental model and study on cement leakage[J]. Spine, 2006, 31(22): 2562-2568. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240695.58651.62
    [17]
    张亮, 王静成, 冯新民, 等. 高粘度骨水泥椎体成形术与普通粘度椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的效果比较[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(18): 4601-4603. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.18.080
    [18]
    张亮, 王静成, 冯新民, 等. 不同黏度骨水泥椎体成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性骨折的疗效研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2016, 22(7): 577-581. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201607001.htm
    [19]
    张亮, 王静成, 冯新民, 等. 高黏度骨水泥用于重度骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折治疗[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2015, 21(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201501001.htm
    [20]
    张亮, 王静成, 冯新民, 等. 唑来膦酸在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体后凸成形术后的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(2): 283-285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2015.02.041
    [21]
    Ma R, Chow R, Shen F H. Kummell′s disease: delayed post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the vertebral body[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(7): 1065-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1205-4
    [22]
    Pappou I P, Papadopoulos E C, Swanson A N, et al. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures and collapse with intravertebral vacuum sign (Kümmel′s disease)[J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(1): 61-66. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080101-35
    [23]
    龚遂良, 陈宝, 范顺武, 等. 椎体内裂隙样变对经皮椎体后凸成形术疗效的影响[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2014, 34(1): 6-12. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2014.01.002
    [24]
    Libicher M, Appelt A, Berger I, et al. The intravertebral vacuum phenomen as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: results from a radiological and histological study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(9): 2248-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0684-0
    [25]
    Kim D Y, Lee S H, Jang J S, et al. Intravertebral vacuum phenomenon in osteoporotic compression fracture: report of 67 cases with quantitative evaluation of intravertebral instability[J]. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100(1): 24-31. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0024
    [26]
    Lim J, Choi S W, Youm J Y, et al. Posttraumatic delayed vertebral collapse: kummell's disease[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2018, 61(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0505.010
    [27]
    He D W, Yu W Y, Chen Z Z, et al. Pathogenesis of the intravertebral vacuum of Kümmell's disease[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(2): 879-882. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3369
    [28]
    Chen L, Dong R B, Gu Y, et al. Comparison between balloon kyphoplasty and short segmental fixation combined with vertebroplasty in the treatment of kümmell's disease[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(4): 373-381. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26218941
    [29]
    Maldague B E, Noel H M, Malghem J J. The intravertebral vacuum cleft: a sign of ischemic vertebral collapse[J]. Radiology, 1978, 129(1): 23-29. doi: 10.1148/129.1.23
    [30]
    Grohs J G, Matzner M, Trieb K, et al. Treatment of intravertebral pseudarthroses by balloon kyphoplasty[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19(8): 560-565. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211232.91340.6b
    [31]
    王远政, 田晓滨, 李波, 等. 高粘度骨水泥与低粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术治疗严重骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的前瞻性比较研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(1): 54-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.01.009
    [32]
    唐冲, 吴四军, 刘正, 等. 高粘度骨水泥经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2017, 27(8): 720-726. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2017.08.08
    [33]
    冯新民, 王静成, 张亮, 等. 高黏度骨水泥在修复骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(30): 4757-4763. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.30.001
    [34]
    Hulme P A, Krebs J, Ferguson S J, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies[J]. Spine, 2006, 31(17): 1983-2001. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229254.89952.6b
    [35]
    Aparisi F. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in vertebral osteoporotic fractures[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2016, 20(4): 382-391. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1592431
    [36]
    Ha K Y, Lee J S, Kim K W, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures with and without intravertebral clefts[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, 88(5): 629-633. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16645109
    [37]
    Xie W X, Jin D X, Ma H, et al. Cement leakage in percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: analysis of risk factors[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2016, 29(4): E171-E176. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000229
    [38]
    杨惠林, 王根林, 姜为民, 等. 分次灌注骨水泥技术治疗Kümmell病[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2012, 10(1): 22-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2012.01.007
    [39]
    Nieuwenhuijse M J, Muijs S P, van Erkel A R, et al. A clinical comparative study on low versus medium viscosity polymethylmetacrylate bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: viscosity associated with cement leakage[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(20): E1037-E1044. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ddd262
    [40]
    Anselmetti G C, Zoarski G, Manca A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage: clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2008, 31(5): 937-947. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9324-6
    [41]
    张亮, 王静成, 冯新民, 等. 高粘度骨水泥椎体成形术与普通粘度椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的效果比较[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(18): 4601-4603. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2017.18.080
    [42]
    Zhang L, Wang J C, Feng X M, et al. A comparison of high viscosity bone cement and low viscosity bone cement vertebroplasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 129: 10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.11.018
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 顾频颉,邱霖,佟阳,曹培华,胡祎,金咏梅. 基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的健康教育在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者中的应用. 中国肿瘤临床与康复. 2025(02): 127-134 .
    2. 安德侠. 加速康复外科理念联合人性化护理在乳腺切除患者中的应用. 妇儿健康导刊. 2024(03): 175-178 .
    3. 包晴霞. 目标执行理念的健康教育对乳腺癌淋巴水肿患者上肢功能锻炼依从性及上肢功能的影响. 现代养生. 2024(12): 912-916 .
    4. 贾巍,宋瑞,王勇,孙霞,董江萌,杨进强. 运动胶带包扎和弹性加压包扎对乳腺癌改良根治术后上肢淋巴水肿的疗效对比. 广西医学. 2024(04): 596-599 .
    5. 乔娜,周飞. 改良式简易锻炼法在乳腺癌术后患者康复中的应用. 反射疗法与康复医学. 2024(01): 75-77+85 .
    6. 黄胜君. 基于保护动机理论的延续性功能锻炼干预对乳腺癌术后出院患者上肢功能评定量表简式评分的影响. 基层医学论坛. 2024(22): 82-84+111 .
    7. 赵迪,马建萍,杨红梅. 新辅助化疗后保乳术与改良根治术治疗Ⅱb~Ⅲa期乳腺癌的临床疗效对比. 中国临床医生杂志. 2024(08): 957-960 .
    8. 单海茂,顾烨,戴胜男,沈霞. 渐进式康复护理联合自制康复操微视频对乳腺癌根治术后患者肩关节活动度及自理能力的影响. 名医. 2024(08): 156-158 .
    9. 吕子岩,蓝敏. 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的康复治疗. 加速康复外科杂志. 2024(02): 86-90 .
    10. 王娟,欧阳婷. 利用微信平台实施功能锻炼量化管理对乳腺癌术后化疗患者康复的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2023(06): 900-904 .
    11. 李红莉,赵宏. 围手术期快速康复外科护理对乳腺癌患者术后日常生活能力的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(14): 136-138 .
    12. 林晓艳. 基于绘画训练的功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者淋巴水肿、患侧肢体功能的影响. 哈尔滨医药. 2023(04): 110-112 .
    13. 赖培芬,陈丽芬. 早期功能锻炼在改善乳腺癌改良根治术患者依从性、患肢功能和生活质量的作用分析. 中国冶金工业医学杂志. 2023(05): 599-600 .
    14. 鹿岁岁,杨妮妮,孟盼丽,陈星星,李晓伟. 早期量化活动训练结合正念减压疗法对乳腺癌根治术后患者上肢功能及疾病自我感受负担的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(32): 165-168 .
    15. 李楠,王园园. 早期阶段性功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者运动耐力与肢体功能恢复的影响. 临床研究. 2023(12): 104-107 .
    16. 徐梦姗,庞欣欣,刘侠,岳亚丽,张昭,陈安玥,毛杨. 芪珍胶囊辅助治疗对乳腺癌T淋巴细胞亚群肿瘤标志物的影响及预后分析. 河北医学. 2023(11): 1922-1926 .
    17. 徐艳丽,刘瑞勤,石明明,罗瑞雪. 肩关节运动八式康复锻炼在乳腺癌改良根治术后病人中的应用. 全科护理. 2022(10): 1377-1379 .
    18. 黄娇凤,施林芳,王文清. 量化患肢功能锻炼联合护理干预对早期乳腺癌术后患者功能训练依从性、生存质量影响研究. 中国医药指南. 2022(19): 31-34 .
    19. 庞玲玲. 家庭为中心模式对乳腺癌改良根治术后患者家庭关怀度评分及康复效果的影响. 黑龙江医学. 2022(20): 2506-2508 .
    20. 孙兴美. 快速康复外科综合护理方案在乳腺癌手术患者护理中的应用. 航空航天医学杂志. 2022(12): 1531-1534 .
    21. 胡广杰,马晓青,付晓红,贾海全,孙静. 早期功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者肩关节功能的影响. 癌症进展. 2022(23): 2462-2464+2472 .
    22. 何岩,丁新. 基于个案管理的综合康复护理在早期乳腺癌术后患者中的应用效果. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2022(12): 112-114 .
    23. 王金环. 乳腺癌术后患者采取肩关节活动操的临床价值研究. 中国现代药物应用. 2021(19): 221-223 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (203) PDF downloads (3) Cited by(25)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return