LIAO Jialong, XIONG Wenting, ZOHNG Shengliang, LAI Huanan. Effect of transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in treating inguinal hernia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 30-32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913008
Citation: LIAO Jialong, XIONG Wenting, ZOHNG Shengliang, LAI Huanan. Effect of transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in treating inguinal hernia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 30-32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913008

Effect of transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in treating inguinal hernia

More Information
  • Received Date: April 07, 2019
  • Accepted Date: May 14, 2019
  • Available Online: February 23, 2021
  • Published Date: July 14, 2019
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical effect of transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (TAPP) in treating inguinal hernia.
      Methods  A total of 82 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into control group(n=41) and observation group(n=41). The control group implemented tension-free hernioplasty, while the observation group was given transabdominal preperitioneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. The situation of surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, hospitalization expenses, postoperative pain scores, serum inflammatory factors index, postoperative recurrence rate were compared.
      Results  The operative time of the observation group was shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower, recovery time of postoperative exhaust, hospitalization time were shorter, and the hospitalization cost was less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the pain scores at 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery in the observation group were all lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The serum inflammatory factor index [Creactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT)] levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rate during 6-month follow-up period between the two groups (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  TAPP can effectively alleviate the surgical trauma of patients with inguinal hernia, accelerate the postoperative recovery, and reduce the economic burden of patients.
  • [1]
    唐石驹, 吴水来, 董红平, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补对中青年男性腹股沟疝疗效的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(12): 83-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2017.12.017
    [2]
    王桐生, 丁磊, 赵爱民, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经正中线切口腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 118-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2016.02.006
    [3]
    蒙象沛, 邓国军, 王石枫, 等. 前入路腹膜前、经腹腹腔镜下、腹腔镜下全腹膜外三种方式在腹膜前疝修补手术中的临床应用研究[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(23): 144-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2017.23.065
    [4]
    李奎, 孙亮, 舒若, 等. 腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝17例[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(6): 533-535. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.06.014
    [5]
    费昱达, 罗华友, 刘霜, 等. 腹腔镜全腹膜外腹膜前修补术治疗plug perfix mesh补片修补术后复发性腹股沟疝53例[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2015, 30(4): 319-320. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2015.04.019
    [6]
    唐黎明, 孙一峰, 马玉亮, 等. Lichtenstein术式和腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前间隙术式在复发性腹股沟疝修补中的应用比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志: 电子版, 2015, 9(6): 15-18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2015.06.005
    [7]
    王明刚, 申英末, 陈杰, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(20): 1588-1590. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.20.010
    [8]
    高亚超, 胡志, 王卓, 等. 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献: 电子版, 2018, 12(3): 204-207, 211. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2018.03.013
    [9]
    黄海锋, 张春军, 喻海波, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术的对比分析[J]. 浙江医学, 2015, 37(2): 140-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYE201502019.htm
    [10]
    刘宁, 吕云福, 陈一明, 等. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术与全腹膜外疝修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的效果比较[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(9): 1362-1365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GAYX201609033.htm
    [11]
    严秋亮, 刘栋, 张凯, 等. 经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术在双侧腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2017, 19(1): 105-106. https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZJKX201512005163.htm
    [12]
    刘剑. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2015, 24(25): 2801-2803. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDJH201525025.htm
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王东,唐兢,莫珊,李洪. 基于视觉模拟评分法和免疫功能指标评估全身麻醉复合腰方肌阻滞在老年妇科肿瘤患者围术期的应用价值. 中国医刊. 2023(04): 417-421 .
    2. 杨沙沙,吴艳飞. 晚期胃癌手术患者全身麻醉复苏期躁动发生的影响因素. 中国医药导报. 2023(13): 118-121 .
    3. 熊盛杰,张田. 硬膜外腔麻醉对老年髋关节置换术患者近远期认知功能及康复效果的影响. 中国现代医学杂志. 2022(04): 89-94 .
    4. 吴予浠. 两种麻醉药物在老年患者全身麻醉术中的应用效果及对其应激反应的影响比较分析. 智慧健康. 2022(29): 94-97+144 .
    5. 唐炜,季锋,袁岚. 电针预处理对胃癌根治术患者术后应激反应、肠黏膜功能及炎性因子水平的影响. 实用临床医药杂志. 2021(16): 40-44 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (262) PDF downloads (3) Cited by(5)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return