Grading test method versus trawl test in detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid

NIU Huaiying; SHI Ying

doi:10.7619/jcmp.201913027

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2019 > 23(13): 96-98. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913027

NIU Huaiying, SHI Ying. Grading test method versus trawl test in detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 96-98. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913027

Citation:

PDF (475 KB)

Grading test method versus trawl test in detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid

NIU Huaiying¹,
SHI Ying^2,

1.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhidan County People′s Hospital, Yan′an, Shaanxi, 717500
2.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Yan'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yan′an, Shaanxi, 716000

More Information

Received Date: April 10, 2019
Accepted Date: May 22, 2019
Available Online: February 23, 2021
Published Date: July 14, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To compare the value of trawl test and grading test in detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid.
Methods A total of 42 patients were conducted with trawl test and grading test respectively for detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid. The differences of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein A (ApoA) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels were compared between the two methods, and the positive detection rate and missed detection rate for each index were compared as well.
Results The levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, ApoA and ApoB by grading test were significantly higher, and the level of LDL-C was significantly lower than that by trawl test (P < 0.05). The positive detection rates of TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, ApoA and ApoB by grading test were significantly higher than those by trawl test (P < 0.05). The missed detection rate by grading test was significantly lower than that by trawl test (P < 0.05).
Conclusion In the biochemical test of blood lipid, the application of grading test can obviously improve the accuracy of test results and reduce the missed detection rate.
- grading test,
- trawl test,
- detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid,
- missed detection rate

FullText(HTML)

References (18)

References

[1]	诸骏仁, 高润霖, 赵水平, 等. 中国成人血脂异常防治指南(2016年修订版)[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2016, 16(10): 15-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXH201610002.htm
[2]	吕天成. 老年男性冠心病患者血清总胆固醇水平与其病死率的相关性探讨[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(3): 377-379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201603039.htm
[3]	李彦娜, 王富伟. 分级检验方法在血脂生化检验中的应用评价[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2017(5): 71-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWJZ201705020.htm
[4]	姜景霞. 分级检验方法学的建立及其在血脂生化检验中的应用研究[J]. 继续医学教育, 2017, 31(8): 136-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYJY201708081.htm
[5]	李勇, 赵水平, 叶平, 等. 中国血脂异常门诊患者调脂治疗一级和二级预防达标现状: DYSIS-China亚组分析[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(8): 665-670. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.08.006
[6]	胡大一. 中国血脂异常与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病防控的新证据和新指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(10): 826-827. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.10.002
[7]	张志宏. 分级检验法在患者血脂生化检验中的应用价值[J]. 中国民康医学, 2017, 29(3); 36-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2017.03.018
[8]	刘军, 许宝学, 张成刚. 血脂生化检验中采用分级检验方法的检验效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(10): 128-128, 131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201710095.htm
[9]	龚江, 冯泳涛. 临床血脂生化检验中采用分级检验方法的效果研究[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(15): 68-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZZX201715029.htm
[10]	邵美玲. 临床血脂生化检验应用分级检验方法的检验效果研究[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7(9): 154-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSBZ201609108.htm
[11]	丁立. 飞行安全建设中航空医学科研面临的问题及对策思考[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志, 2010, 21(4): 302-304.
[12]	陈付英, 李明. 胆固醇代谢异常与相关角化异常性遗传性皮肤病研究进展[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志, 2017, 33 (8): 506-509. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MALA201708024.htm
[13]	赵轶男, 张树彪, 崔韶晖, 等. 胆固醇嵌入式阳离子脂质体运载基因研究[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2014, 36 (9): 1257-1261. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBZZ201409007.htm
[14]	康云平, 陈宝炳, 滕勇, 等. 探讨营养性巨幼细胞贫血引起的单纯性高同型半胱氨酸血症[J]. 疾病监测, 2010, 25 (6): 505-506. doi: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2010.06.025
[15]	邵美玲. 临床血脂生化检验应用分级检验方法的检验效果研究[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7(9): 154-155. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSBZ201609108.htm
[16]	唐勇. 分级检验方法学的建立及其在血脂生化检验中的应用效果观察[J]. 饮食保健, 2017, 4(2): 247-248.
[17]	龚江, 冯泳涛. 临床血脂生化检验中采用分级检验方法的效果研究[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(15): 64-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZZX201715029.htm
[18]	刘冬, 吕建新. 血脂生化检验中采用分级检验方法的检验效果观察[J]. 广东微量元素科学, 2017, 24(5): 33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-446X.2017.05.009

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

1.	马杰，周平辉，李娜，张丽. 肠道训练技术在骨科腰椎滑脱术后卧床患者便秘中的应用研究. 南通大学学报(医学版). 2024(01): 97-99 .
2.	赵晓茜，孙进宁，邢双双，杜长艳. 系统化康复训练对血液系统恶性肿瘤化疗患者便秘及相关症状的干预效果. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(04): 117-122 . 本站查看
3.	杨浩伦，薛建良，张黎明. 多体位按摩联合中频脉冲电以及超声波治疗急性阑尾炎穿孔术后不完全性肠梗阻一例. 华西医学. 2023(06): 952-953 .
4.	赵佳丽，徐海虹，余旭彪. 针刺疗法联合康复训练改善腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后胃肠功能临床研究. 新中医. 2023(18): 151-155 .
5.	刘杰. 完全经肛单孔腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术后排便功能康复训练护理效果. 中国实用医药. 2021(04): 201-203 .
6.	琚会平. 循证护理干预对终末期恶性肿瘤合并肠梗阻患者肠道症状及生活质量的影响. 中国肛肠病杂志. 2020(01): 58-60 .
7.	郑丽娜. 基于预见性理论的优质护理对肠梗阻患者术后感染的预防效果观察. 临床研究. 2020(05): 155-156 .
8.	李丹丹. 1例老年女性不完全性肠梗阻合并肛门内括约肌痉挛收缩的护理. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2020(16): 139 .
9.	周宁. 一例胸12压缩性骨折合并功能性便秘患者肠道康复训练护理体会. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2020(19): 166-167 .
10.	牛琼亚. 快速康复护理对肠梗阻患儿术后胃肠功能及并发症的影响. 中国民康医学. 2020(07): 154-156 .
11.	周凡，林晔，何巧珍，刘雪. 茶油胃管注入联合腹部按摩对成人不完全性肠梗阻的应用效果研究. 中国医学创新. 2020(30): 99-101 .
12.	李玲燕. 医护一体化模式在温通抗癌方治疗不全性肠梗阻中的应用评价. 中国现代药物应用. 2019(11): 208-209 .
13.	宋玉蓉. 粘连性不全性肠梗阻患者俯卧位护理干预的临床应用. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(85): 18-19 .
14.	梁毅. 便秘防治体操在预防中央束综合征便秘中的效果观察. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(93): 352+360 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (262) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(15)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Grading test method versus trawl test in detection of biochemical indicators of blood lipid

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(14)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content