GAO Danqing, MA Xiaofeng. Effect observation of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine in the treatment of patients with severe depression in acute phase[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(1): 62-65. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202001016
Citation: GAO Danqing, MA Xiaofeng. Effect observation of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine in the treatment of patients with severe depression in acute phase[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(1): 62-65. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202001016

Effect observation of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine in the treatment of patients with severe depression in acute phase

More Information
  • Received Date: October 16, 2019
  • Available Online: December 22, 2020
  • Published Date: August 06, 2020
  • Objective To explore the clinical effect of venlafaxine combined with quetiapine in the treatment of patients with severe depression in the acute phase. Methods A total of 100 patients with severe depression were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated with venlafaxine and quetiapine, while the control group was treated with venlafaxine and placebo. After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the scores of Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)were compared between two groups, and the safety of the drugs was assessed by Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS). Results There were no significant differences in HAMD and HAMA scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the scores of HAMD and HAMA in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the scores of HAMD and HAMA in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, the effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group, but no significant difference was found(P>0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, there was no significant difference in TESS score between the two groups(P>0.05), TESS score were lower at the 8th week when compared with the data at the 4th week(P<0.05). After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, the number of patients with insomnia and hypertension in the observation group - was significantly less than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Venlafaxine combined with quetiapine is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with acute severe depression in acute phase, which can reduce scores of HAMD and HAMA, and incidence rate of insomnia and hypertension.
  • 王小丽. 益生菌治疗抑郁症的研究进展[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2017, 17(7): 525-527.
    李谨, 汪水利, 李云庆, 等. 抑郁症易感基因的研究进展[J]. 神经解剖学杂志, 2017, 33(1): 103-106.
    Tundo A, de Filippis R, Proietti L. Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: Evidences and personal experience[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2015, 5(3): 330-341.
    慕磊, 孙建绪. 抑郁症发病机制与抗抑郁药物作用靶标[J]. 国际药学研究杂志, 2015, 42(4): 463-466.
    Sie S D, Wennink J M, van Driel J J, et al. Maternal use of SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs: practical recommendations during pregnancy and lactation[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2012, 97(6): F472-F476.
    姜美俊. 抗精神病药联合抗抑郁药治疗伴有精神病性症状的抑郁症1例[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2017, 43(3): 190-192.
    Montgomery S A, Altamura A C, Katila H, et al. Efficacy of extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy in elderly patients with major depressive disorder: secondary analyses in subgroups of patients according to baseline anxiety, sleep disturbance, and pain levels[J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 2014, 29(2): 93-105.
    张华, 庞剑月, 曹素霞, 等. 认知行为治疗在抑郁症患者自杀态度安全管理中的应用[J]. 医学与哲学(B), 2018, 39(11): 80-82.
    相燕静, 王中刚, 陈景清. 单胺氧化酶抑制剂在精神科临床应用的研究进展[J]. 医学与哲学(B), 2016, 37(4): 54-57.
    宋婷婷, 周东晨, 吴丽鑫, 等. 从单胺机制分析抑郁症与癌症的关联[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2018, 26(22): 3686-3689.
    Locher M C, Koechlin M H, Zion M S R, et al. Efficacy and Safety of SSRIs, SNRIs, and Placebo in Common Psychiatric Disorders: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis in Children and Adolescents[J]. Jama Psychiatry, 2017, 74(10): 1011-1011.
    翟金国, 赵靖平. 新型抗抑郁药治疗焦虑谱系障碍研究进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2007, 42(14): 1041-1045.
    侯霖, 李彦华, 王景俊. 抗抑郁药的研究新进展[J]. 医学综述, 2007, 13(19): 1511-1512.
    王玉文, 宋明芬. 度洛西汀与文拉法辛治疗抑郁症疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国药师, 2016, 19(1): 96-99.
    罗新, 崔凤伟, 陆伟琦. 文拉法辛缓释胶囊与舍曲林治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性对照研究[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2015, 44(12): 1392-1394.
    李力, 高睿哲, 杨壮凤, 等. 富马酸喹硫平对肺癌患者相关焦虑与抑郁的治疗效果[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(2): 254-255.
    McIntyre R S, Filteau M J, Martin L, et al. Treatment-resistant depression: definitions, review of the evidence, and algorithmic approach[J]. J Affect Disord, 2014, 156: 1-7.
    汪广阔. 奥氮平联合盐酸氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症急性期对生存质量的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2014, 12(35): 89-90.
  • Related Articles

    [1]SHEN Qin, ZHANG Xiao, WU Ting, CHEN Liang. Clinical value of calcification scores of coronary artery CT angiography in evaluating coronary artery lesions and prognosis in patients with chronic angina pectoris[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(3): 1-4, 8. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213903
    [2]LIU Gang, JIANG Ling, SUN Wei. Value of multi-slice spiral CT angiography in evaluating the morphological characteristics of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in patients with intracranial ischemic changes[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(17): 52-56. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212617
    [3]GU Wenhao, WANG Lihuan, WANG Caihong, YU Yifan. Application value of coronary angiography by 256-slice CT scanner in free rhythm of the heart[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(24): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024010
    [4]QIN Min, HOU Danwei. Value of CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis and collateral circulation in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 14-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011004
    [5]WANG Beihong, XIA Zhenkun. Value of 128 multi-slice spiral CT angiography in diagnosis of left renal vein entrapment syndrome in children[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(2): 13-15. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202002004
    [6]LI Jianyi, XU Yan, WANG Junpeng, LIU Zhenguo. Value of coronary CT angiography in quantitative assessment and prognostic assessment of plaque in patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(19): 30-32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201919008
    [7]WANG Song. Value of coronary CT angiography in the diagnosisof plaque characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(17): 42-44. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201917012
    [8]WANG Pengcheng, ZHANG Yi. Diagnostic value of intestinal CT imaging by doublefilling method of large and small intestine in the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 37-40. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916010
    [9]LI Xiaomin, HU Xiaoyun, LIU Renfei. Value of magnetic resonance imaging versus spiral CT in the diagnosis of biliary diseases[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916009
    [10]BAI Wenwei, LIU Xiaoyong, ZHU Min. Value of echocardiography combined with 256-slice CT angiography in the diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (3): 96-98. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201803027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 周彩凤,崔万花. 信迪利单抗联合TP化疗方案治疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤标志物和免疫平衡的影响. 中国医学创新. 2024(28): 121-124 .
    2. 樊宁. 血管内皮生长因子和肿瘤标志物对肺癌分期的诊断价值分析. 临床研究. 2023(06): 10-13 .
    3. 雷小平,孙雅菊. 参芪扶正注射液在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗中的效果. 中国医药导刊. 2023(04): 425-429 .
    4. 吴西,张家艳,殷俊,杨春茂. 免疫治疗联合含铂双药治疗肺腺癌疗效及对患者短期生存的影响. 北华大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(05): 617-621 .
    5. 杜晓丹,徐维国,朱静,李琳,吴君华. 嘌呤能型2受体家族X7嘌呤受体高表达与可切除非小细胞肺癌患者临床病理特征及预后的相关性研究. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(10): 77-82 . 本站查看
    6. 柳芳美,凡国华,徐金静,王庆,杨俊俊,闵凌峰,张梦,吴书清. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在非小细胞肺癌合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者中的临床意义. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(15): 45-49 . 本站查看
    7. 冯雨,崔东,张会民,刘渊源,李瑞杰,栾加强,徐明星,钱如林. 外周血循环肿瘤细胞联合血清肿瘤标志物检测在非小细胞肺癌患者中的临床意义. 实用医院临床杂志. 2022(06): 31-33 .
    8. 周明锴. 四项血清指标联合检测在鉴别诊断NSCLC中的价值分析. 实验与检验医学. 2021(03): 655-657+687 .
    9. 杨明,邢坤,袁五营,杜佳辉,白杨. 非小细胞肺癌组织错配切除修复蛋白1、核苷酸还原酶M1和乳腺癌易感基因1的表达与预后的关系. 实用医院临床杂志. 2021(05): 43-47 .
    10. 杨旭,朱德兵,王巍炜,唐明伟,钱俊. 5种肿瘤标志物在非小细胞肺癌中的诊断价值. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(34): 28-32 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (947) PDF downloads (29) Cited by(12)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return