LI Xia, LU Wenmin, GU Xiaofeng, XIAO Feng, WU Jian. Endoscopic open reduction versus conventionalclosed reduction in treatment of patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 103-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200829
Citation: LI Xia, LU Wenmin, GU Xiaofeng, XIAO Feng, WU Jian. Endoscopic open reduction versus conventionalclosed reduction in treatment of patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 103-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200829

Endoscopic open reduction versus conventionalclosed reduction in treatment of patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone

More Information
  • Received Date: December 13, 2020
  • Available Online: March 14, 2021
  • Published Date: February 27, 2021
  •   Objective  To compare the effect of endoscopic open reduction and conventional closed reduction in treatment of patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone.
      Methods  Totally 64 patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone were randomly divided into two groups, with 32 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional closed reduction, and the observation group was treated with endoscopic open reduction of nasal bone. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the therapeutic conditions of the patients, and six items such as nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing, nasal secretion, nasal pain, nasal appearance, and the influence of trauma on psychological status were selected as subjective scoring items.
      Results  There was a significant difference in the score of nasal secretion before operation between the two groups (P < 0.05). At 3 months after operation, the scores of 6 subjective scoring items in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the scores of nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing as well as nasal appearance in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Endoscopic open reduction of nasal bone fracture can significantly improve the nasal ventilation condition, nasal itching and sneezing and nasal appearance in patients with type Ⅱ fracture of nasal bone, and has higher safety.
  • [1]
    MONDIN V, RINALDO A, FERLITO A. Management of nasal bone fractures[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2005, 26(3): 181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2004.11.006
    [2]
    CORMIER J, MANOOGIAN S, BISPLINGHOFF J, et al. The tolerance of the nasal bone to blunt impact[J]. Ann Adv Automot Med, 2010, 54: 3-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21050587
    [3]
    YILMAZ M S, GUVEN M, KAYABASOGLU G, et al. Efficacy of closed reduction for nasal fractures in children[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 51(8): e256-e258. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.008
    [4]
    RHEE S C, KIM Y K, CHA J H, et al. Septal fracture in simple nasal bone fracture[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2004, 113(1): 45-52. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000096705.64545.69
    [5]
    HWANG K, YOU S H. Analysis of facial bone fractures: an 11-year study of 2, 094 patients[J]. Indian J Plast Surg, 2010, 43(1): 42-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1699402
    [6]
    CORMIER J, MANOOGIAN S, BISPLINGHOFF J, et al. The tolerance of the nasal bone to blunt impact[J]. Ann Adv Automot Med, 2010, 54: 3-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21050587
    [7]
    CHAN J, MOST S P. Diagnosis and management of nasal fractures[J]. Oper Tech Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 2008, 19(4): 263-266. doi: 10.1016/j.otot.2008.07.003
    [8]
    苏振忠. 耳鼻咽喉创伤学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2004: 255-256.
    [9]
    余洪德. 多排螺旋CT与DR在鼻骨骨折中的检查探讨[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2018, 2(11): 82-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2018.11.050
    [10]
    SNOW S, KIRWAN J R. Visual analogue scales: a source of error[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1988, 47(6): 526-526. doi: 10.1136/ard.47.6.526
    [11]
    林雯超, 王珮华. 鼻骨骨折的诊治进展[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2015, 23(4): 313-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJH201504025.htm
    [12]
    CHAN J, MOST S P. Diagnosis and management of nasal fractures[J]. Oper Tech Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 2008, 19(4): 263-266. doi: 10.1016/j.otot.2008.07.003
    [13]
    STAFFEL J G. Optimizing treatment of nasal fractures[J]. Laryngoscope, 2002, 112(10): 1709-1719. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00001
    [14]
    PARK C H, KWON T K, LEE J H, et al. Endoscopically assisted reduction of nasal bone fractures[J]. Rhinology, 2009, 47(3): 301-304. doi: 10.4193/Rhin08.184
    [15]
    KIM J T, KIM S K. Endoscopically assisted, intraorally approached corrective rhinoplasty[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001, 108(1): 199-207. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00031
    [16]
    KIM H S, SUH H W, HA K Y, et al. The usefulness of the endonasal incisional approach for the treatment of nasal bone fracture[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2012, 39(3): 209-215. doi: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.209
    [17]
    VIEHWEG T L, ROBERSON J B, HUDSON J W. Epistaxis: diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 64(3): 511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.031
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHENG Gang, WANG Changxing. Clinical effect of thoracoscopy-based reduction and internal fixation in treatment of elderly patients with rib fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(5): 89-93. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233999
    [2]YI Shende, CAI Jun, ZOU Yun. Effect of closed reduction and elastic intramedullary nailing fixation versus reduction and fixation by Kirschner wire prying in treating radial neck fracture in children[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 77-80. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200783
    [3]WU Tingjiang. Effect of Sanders type Ⅱ to Ⅲ calcaneal fracture treated by internal fixation of steel plate through Chinese character "八" shaped incision of tarsal sinus approach[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 47-50. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013014
    [4]WANG Baoxi, LIN Guangsheng, KANG Junfeng. Value of closed reduction by percutaneous hollow screw fixation for ankle fracture patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (22): 49-51. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201822016
    [5]WANG Jian, NIU Anquan. Efficacy of surgical open reduction in the treatment of patients with fracture of anterior lateral rotation of ankle joint[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (1): 119-121. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201801037
    [6]SHANG Bo. Relationship between postoperative complications of soft tissue and different operation time of incision reduction combined with internal fixation operation in patients with calcaneus fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (19): 66-69. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201419020
    [7]Effect comparison between fractional delay operation and early incision internal fixation operation in treatment of patients with high energy Pilon fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (11): 55-57. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201411016
    [8]ZHANG Bohao, WANG Tao. Comparative study of outcomes after percutaneous pinning versus open reduction in paediatric supracondylarel bow fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (14): 117-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201314042
    [9]SHAO Fang. Open reduction and internal fixation method of manual reduction and plaster external fixation in the treatment of senile osteoporotic distal radius fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (13): 128-130,133. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201313047
    [10]SUN Mingqi, HAO Ting. Assessment of the clinical efficacy and functional outcome in elderly patients with open reduction internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (11): 136-138. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201311056

Catalog

    Article views (354) PDF downloads (13) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return