WU Jun, YANG Yang, YI Wei. Clinical effect of dissection of axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011027
Citation: WU Jun, YANG Yang, YI Wei. Clinical effect of dissection of axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011027

Clinical effect of dissection of axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer

More Information
  • Received Date: March 04, 2020
  • Available Online: August 27, 2020
  • Objective To investigate the clinical effect of dissection of axillary lymph nodes with ultrasonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods A total of 110 patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer were selected as study objects, and were divided into two groups by random number table method, with 55 cases per group. General electric scalpel and ultrasonic scalpel were respectively given to the control group and the observation group for modified radical mastectomy. The clinical indexes(time of surgery, amount of bleeding during the surgery, indwelling time of axillary drainage tube, the number of lymph nodes cleaned)and the occurrence of postoperative complications were compared. Results The operative time, the amount of bleeding during surgery and indwelling time of axillary drainage tube of the observation group were better than those in the control group, while the number of lymph nodes cleaned was more than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 3.64%(2/55)in the observation group, which was significantly lower than 18.18%(11/55)in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer, ultrasonic scalpel in axillary lymph node dissection has better clinical efficacy, and lower incidence of adverse reactions.
  • 辛灵, 刘荫华. 乳腺癌诊断与外科治疗的基本问题[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(12): 153-155.
    张博. 保乳手术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的手术指标及安全性对比分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019(6): 683-685.
    王蔚文, 湖南省医院协会. 临床疾病诊断与疗效判断标准[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2010: 1371-1375.
    曾广春, 冯占军, 高佳仪. 乳腺癌临床病理特征对乳腺癌肝转移的影响[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报, 2019, 53(1): 62-65.
    解新鹏, 刘维芳, 张宇, 等. 前哨淋巴结微转移与腋窝淋巴结复发关系的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志, 2019, 13(2): 118-120.
    向永涛, 甘兵, 赵亮. 乳腺癌原发灶超声特征与腋窝淋巴结转移的关系[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2019, 35(10): 1251-1254.
    芮小平, 肖献秋, 姚瑶. 改良根治腋窝淋巴结清除术对Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者保留ICBN的可操作性及临床意义[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2017, 32(4): 565-567.
    李思维, 张显玉, 庞达. 超声刀对乳腺癌改良根治术患者疗效的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2019, 17(11): 1286-1288.
    游文锋. 超声刀与普通电刀在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的应用[J]. 临床医学, 2017, 37(9): 52-54.
    周鹏, 庄大勇, 贺青卿, 等. Harmonic focus+超声刀在腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的临床应用研究[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志, 2016(5): 378-381.
    梅俊, 易茂林, 彭程程. 超声刀联合腋窝处皮肤外固定预防乳腺癌改良根治术后皮下积液的效果分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2018, 22(11): 2162-2164.
    王东风, 唐金海, 秦建伟, 等. 超声刀在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的应用及效果评价[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2015, 7(1): 30-32.
    王国庆, 陈德明, 范海鹰, 等. 超声刀在乳腺癌手术腋窝淋巴结清扫中的应用效果[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2012, 14(6): 950-951.
    李孟天, 刘刚, 郁晓峰, 等. 超声刀与电刀在乳腺癌手术中应用效果比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(11): 1541-1546.
    狄琳娜, 钱永坤, 姜敏. 超声刀与普通电刀在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果评价[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2015, 5(1): 366-368.

Catalog

    Article views (385) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return