YU Hongzhi, TONG Xianping, ZHU Feng. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013010
Citation: YU Hongzhi, TONG Xianping, ZHU Feng. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013010

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures

More Information
  • Received Date: March 19, 2020
  • Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation through Wiltse approach in treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Totally 30 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were randomly divided into percutaneous group(n=14)and Wiltse group(n=16). The operation related indexes were compared between the two groups. The scores of Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)before operation, on the first day after operation, 6 months after operation and 1 year after operation as well as scores of waist and back Oswestry disability index(ODI)at 3, 6 months and 1 year after operation were compared between the two groups. The relative height of anterior edge of injured vertebral body and kyphosis angle of injured vertebrae were compared between the two groups before operation, on the first day after operation, 6 months after operation and 1 year after operation. The complications were compared between the two groups. Results All the patients completed the operation successfully and were followed up for at least 1 year. The operation time, intra-operative fluoroscopy times in the percutaneous group was significantly longer and more than those in the Wiltse group, and intra-operative blood loss was significantly less than that in the Wiltse group(P<0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups were significantly decreased at 1 day, 6 months and 1 year after operation(P<0.05), and the VAS score at 1 d after operation of the percutaneous group was significantly lower than that of the Wiltse - group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ODI scores between the two groups at 3, 6 months and 1 year after operation(P>0.05). After operation, the relative height of the anterior edge of injured vertebrae in the two groups returned to normal, and the kyphosis angle of injured vertebrae was significantly improved compared with operation before(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). Wound infection occurred in 1 case(6.3%)in the Wiltse group and 1 case with subcutaneous hematoma(7.1%)in the percutaneous group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Both internal fixation by percutaneous pedicle screw and pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach can achieve satisfactory clinical effects in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, and have lower incidence of complication. Internal fixation by percutaneous pedicle screw should be given for single-segment fracture patients without spinal canal decompressive operation, while pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach should be given for multiple-segment fracture patients without spinal canal decompressive operation.
  • VACCARO A R, LEHMAN R A Jr, HURLBERT R J, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status[J]. Spine, 2005, 30(20): 2325-2333.
    KIM B G, DAB J M, SHIN D E. Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture[J]. Asian Spine J, 2015, 9(1): 133-146.
    LIAO J C, FAN K F, KEOROCHANA G, et al. Transpedicular grafting after short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fracture: calcium sulfate cement versus autogenous iliac bone graft[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(15): 1482-1488.
    WILTSE L L, BATEMAN J G, HUTCHINSON R H, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968, 50(5): 919-926.
    MAGERL F. External skeletal fixation of the lower thoracic and the lumbar spine[M] //Current Concepts of External Fixation of Fractures. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1982: 353-366.
    FOLEY K T, GUPTA S K. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results[J]. J Neurosurg: Spine, 2002, 97(1): 7-12.
    蒋翔, 徐峰. 磁力导航结合CT三维成像系统在胸腰椎经皮椎弓根螺钉置入术中的临床应用[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2020, 30(1): 86-90.
    LEE J K, JANG J W, KIM T W, et al. Percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw placement without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it effective?: comparative study with open short-segment pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion[J]. Acta Neurochir(Wien), 2013, 155(12): 2305-2312.
    邢泽军, 马迅, 马建平. 伤椎置钉与否对导航引导下经皮椎弓根螺钉短节段固定治疗胸腰椎压缩骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34(5): 388-394.
    黄杰聪, 谢俊杰, 曾志远. 经皮椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志, 2020, 37(2): 133-135.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Fandong, ZHENG Jiazhuang, CHEN Yu, SONG Zhaojun, LIU Yuanbin, TANG Long, WANG Miao, ZHOU Yong, LIU Huiyi. Effects of pedicle screw internal fixation via different approaches in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 83-87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232471
    [2]YANG Yang, LIU Hao, WANG Fulin, HE Erping. Analysis of recurrence factors after borehole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 73-75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022021
    [3]ZHAO Ping, ZHANG Li. Effectiveness and safety of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the treatment of gestational diabetes patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(15): 61-64. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202015017
    [4]ZHAO Yuefeng. Effect of hematoma removal and decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(6): 98-100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202006027
    [5]SHI Qiang, PAN Weicheng, LIU Yue, WANG Zhikang, LI Yunjian, CHENG Yun, WEI Jingyu. Effect of surgical repair of refractory subcutaneous effusion after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(24): 89-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201924028
    [6]HAO Caihong, MA Shicai. Nursing effect of hydrocolloid transparent dressing on reduction of stasis and pain in plateletpheresis patients with subcutaneous ecchymosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(22): 20-23. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201922007
    [7]XU Jialu, PAN Huirong, CHANG Zheng, ZHU Min. Effects of different abdominal subcutaneous injection of low molecular weight heparin sodium[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (16): 145-147. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201616044
    [8]HUANG Jian, XIAO Chunrong. Clinical analysis on diagnosis and treatment of 20 patients with delayed traumatic intra cephalic hematoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (Z1): 86-87.
    [9]CHEN Qiang. Clinical research on the minimally invasive hematoma in the treatment of hypertensive thalamic hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (21): 97-99. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201321027
    [10]CHEN Fu-mei. Hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula puncture needle withdrawal after subcutaneous hematoma reason analysis and nursing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2012, (14): 42-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2012.14.015
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 赵攀. 微通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的效果观察. 大医生. 2025(01): 59-61 .
    2. 李群秀,张胜利,邢伟只,李磊. 经皮肾微造瘘取石术联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石患者的疗效观察. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(10): 42-45 . 本站查看
    3. 何泉芳,王沛昌,杨华旭,唐华,陈启富,王德明,林金松,林叶福. 闽西地区感染性结石的危险因素分析及预测模型构建. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(10): 24-28+34 . 本站查看
    4. 王纯才,刘近坤. 上尿路结石输尿管软镜手术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗效果对比. 系统医学. 2023(08): 106-109 .
    5. 张名清,刘芳,吴雯. 上尿路结石术后泌尿系感染患者的中段尿病原微生物培养结果及菌株耐药性分析. 实用医技杂志. 2023(12): 881-884 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (292) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(5)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return