SONG Junya, WU Guirong, JIANG Yihua. Kuntai Capsule versus femoston in the treatment of patients with climacteric syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(15): 102-104. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202015029
Citation: SONG Junya, WU Guirong, JIANG Yihua. Kuntai Capsule versus femoston in the treatment of patients with climacteric syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(15): 102-104. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202015029

Kuntai Capsule versus femoston in the treatment of patients with climacteric syndrome

More Information
  • Received Date: June 27, 2020
  • Published Date: September 09, 2020
  • Objective To compare the effect of Kuntai Capsule and femoston in the treatment of patients with climacteric syndrome. Methods Totally 80 patients with climacteric syndrome were randomly divided into observation group(n=40)and control group(n=40). The control group was treated with femoston, and the observation group was treated with Kuntai Capsule. The levels of blood lipid indexes [triglyceride(TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C), total cholesterol(TC)and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C)], sex hormone indexes [estradiol(E2), luteinizing hormone(LH)and follicle stimulating hormone(FSH)] and adverse reactions were compared before and after treatment between the two groups. Results After 12 weeks of treatment, the levels of TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C in both groups were significantly improved, the levels of TG, TC, LDL-C in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the HDL-C level was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). After 12 weeks of treatment, the levels of E2, LH and FSH in both groups were significantly improved when compared with those before treatment, and the level of E2 in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, while the levels of LH and FSH were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 7.50%, which showed no significant difference compared to 17.50% in the control group(P>0.05). Conclusion Clinical effect of Kuntai Capsule is significantly better than that of femoston in the treatment of patients with climacteric syndrome, which can not only effectively regulate the levels of blood lipid indexes and sex hormone indexes, but also has less adverse reactions.
  • 王凤玲, 严雪征. 坤泰胶囊联合替勃龙对更年期综合征妇女内分泌及免疫功能的影响[J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2018, 40(5):569-572.
    杜晓琴, 衡明莉, 徐玲. 坤泰胶囊和激素替代治疗围绝经期综合征患者的有效性及安全性荟萃分析[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2016, 43(3):267-271.
    凌晨. 围绝经期妇女性激素治疗40例临床随访分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2007, 31(3):241-242.
    尚友琴, 程文静, 孙宏伟, 等. 替勃龙与坤泰胶囊治疗更年期综合征疗效及其对雌二醇、卵泡刺激素和子宫内膜厚度影响的比较[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2016, 15(7):725-728.
    徐丽, 徐萍. 坤泰胶囊治疗女性更年期综合征的研究进展[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(4):895-896.
    张洪涛, 赵金艳, 神合巧. 临床妇产科学[M]. 上海:第二军医大学出版社, 2011:362-367.
    郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则:试行[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2002:364-365.
    李书艳, 姜文. 坤泰胶囊联合芬吗通治疗更年期综合征的疗效及安全性[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(5):1100-1102.
    陈芳. 女性绝经后雌激素水平与血脂、血糖和血同型半胱氨酸的关系研究[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2016, 20(5):758-760.
    杨波, 徐慧敏, 朱亚芹, 等. 坤泰胶囊联合雌性激素替代疗法治疗更年期综合征的临床效果及可能的作用机制[J]. 中国性科学, 2017, 26(11):60-63.
    姜孝好, 张辉. 芬吗通联合坤泰胶囊对更年期综合征伴失眠患者性激素水平和心理状态的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2018, 26(7):972-976.
    许振. 坤宁安丸联合芬吗通治疗更年期综合征疗效及对血清激素水平和免疫功能的影响[J]. 中国药业, 2018, 27(16):55-57.
    杨云华, 许苏华. 坤泰胶囊联合小剂量戊酸雌二醇治疗更年期综合征疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(23):2586-2589.
    马存福, 索南草. 坤泰胶囊联合地屈孕酮和替勃龙治疗更年期综合征的临床疗效及对激素水平的影响[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(6):104-105.
    伍雯莹, 胡静, 熊莉. 坤泰胶囊联合尼尔雌醇治疗对更年期综合征患者性激素和血脂水平的影响[J]. 中国医药, 2018, 13(11):1725-1729.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 肖宗清,董翠婷,张杰,刘园园,吴汉利. 维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的建立与验证. 临床肾脏病杂志. 2024(04): 265-270 .
    2. 吴云亭,戴艳,彭晓杰. 基于饮食营养干预在儿童慢性肾脏病生长发育中的应用研究. 中国当代医药. 2024(30): 149-152+157 .
    3. 刘鹏程. 罗沙司他与重组人促红细胞生成素治疗维持性血液透析肾性贫血的临床效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(24): 121-123+128 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (550) PDF downloads (18) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return