Advance Search
LI Yong, ZHOU Jianhua, YIN Wenjun, ZHANG Shichao. Analysis in causes of secondary surgery after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 49-51. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201625
Citation: LI Yong, ZHOU Jianhua, YIN Wenjun, ZHANG Shichao. Analysis in causes of secondary surgery after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 49-51. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201625
shu

Analysis in causes of secondary surgery after endovascular aneurysm repair

  • Department of Vascular Surgery, Dali Prefecture People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Dali, Yunnan, 671000

More Information
  • Received Date: February 17, 2021
  • Available Online: March 14, 2021
  • Published Date: February 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To analyze causes of secondary surgery after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR).
      Methods  The clinical data and follow-up results of 171 patients with subrenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with EVAR were retrospectively analyzed, among whom 20 patients received secondary surgical intervention. The reasons for the secondary surgical intervention were analyzed, and how to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of EVAR was discussed.
      Results  Out of 20 patients with secondary surgeries, type Ⅰ leakage occurred in 8 cases(typeⅠa in 6 cases and type Ⅰb in 2 cases), type Ⅱ leakage in 2 cases (arterial blood re-entry of inferior mesenteric artery), Ⅲ type of leakage in 2 cases (left iliac branch retracting into the lumen), thrombotic occlusion of left iliac branch subject to stent thrombosis in 2 cases, iliac vein thrombosis in 4 cases, and iliac stenosis in 2 cases. The results of regression analysis showed that postoperative leakage and distal ischemia were the main reasons for the secondary operation in EVAR patients. The combination of endovascular repair and strict follow-up are the key to improve the safety and effectiveness of the operation.
      Conclusion  EVAR has a good short-term effect, but postoperative internal leakage and distal ischemia are still the key factors affecting its efficacy, which may lead to secondary operation.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (9)
  • [1]
    狄杰斌, 戚丽娜. 某综合医院非计划再次手术原因分析及对策[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2015, 9(2): 348-351. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYD201502039.htm
    [2]
    DAVIS F M, RATERI D L, DAUGHERTY A. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: novel mechanisms and therapies[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2015, 30(6): 566-573. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000216
    [3]
    YAMAMOTO K, KOMORI K, BANNO H, et al. Validation of patient selection for endovascular aneurysm repair or open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm-single-center study[J]. Circ J, 2015, 79(8): 1699-1705. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1160
    [4]
    GOLLEDGE J. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: update on pathogenesis and medical treatments[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2019, 16(4): 225-242. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0114-9
    [5]
    张会理. 多层螺旋CT血管成像技术在腹主动脉瘤诊断中的应用价值分析[J]. 包头医学, 2019, 43(3): 21-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTYI201903011.htm
    [6]
    KOCAASLAN C, ALDAG M, KEHLIBAR T, et al. Open repair of a type Ia endoleak with a giant abdominal aortic aneurysm sac[J]. Nort clin Ista, 2018, 79(37): 261-263. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30688938
    [7]
    LI B, KHAN S, SALATA K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(3): 954-969. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.076
    [8]
    NONAKA T, KIMURA N, HORI D J, et al. Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Open and Endovascular Aortic Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm[J]. Annals of Vascular Diseases, 2018, 11(3): 298-305. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.18-00029
    [9]
    李文睿, 李清乐, 张小明, 等. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅰ型内漏的处理[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(3): 239-242.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 胡鲁东，李子军，李永兴，段晨曦，王明轩，侯文明. 血清纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体水平对腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术后发生髂支闭塞的预测价值. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志. 2023(02): 214-219 .
    2. 于雷，陈龙媚，赵凤珠，陈忠杨，李志学. MCOLN1在腹主动脉瘤中的表达及对预后的影响. 黑龙江医药科学. 2023(05): 50-51+54 .
    3. 黄弘伟. 腹主动脉夹层腔内修复手术的研究进展. 中外医学研究. 2022(07): 178-181 .
    4. 田壮博，梁帅兵，蔡卓言. 腹主动脉瘤EVAR术后联合应用地塞米松对患者术后应激反应、术后并发症的影响. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2022(08): 830-834 .
    5. 林志强，王丹. Fibulin-3、OPN、ICAM-1在腹主动脉瘤中的表达及意义. 广东医学. 2022(07): 888-892 .
    6. 王永慧，王骁，张韬. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏的原因及处理. 中华普通外科杂志. 2022(12): 958-960 .
    7. 孔德福，关明子，王效增，周铁楠，王亚松，刘轩泽. “一站式”行冠状动脉介入治疗、腹主动脉腔内修复术及肾动脉烟囱术1例. 临床军医杂志. 2021(08): 945-946 .
    8. 苏连花，毕亚敏，刘婉华，宁俊杰，姚陈. 主动脉疾病术后出院患者规范管理的效果分析. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版). 2021(05): 356-359 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (385) PDF downloads (8) Cited by(8)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return