Advance Search
LIU Wei, ZHANG Naiying. Effect of thrombelastogram in monitoring hemostatic and coagulation function in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery during blood transfusion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 11-14. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020003
Citation: LIU Wei, ZHANG Naiying. Effect of thrombelastogram in monitoring hemostatic and coagulation function in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery during blood transfusion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 11-14. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020003
shu

Effect of thrombelastogram in monitoring hemostatic and coagulation function in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery during blood transfusion

  • 1. Department of Blood Transfusion, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710054;

  • 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xi'an City Central Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710001

More Information
  • Received Date: August 18, 2020
  • Available Online: December 21, 2020
  • Published Date: November 12, 2020
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objective To investigate the effect of thrombelastogram(TEG)in monitoring hemostatic and coagulation function in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery during blood transfusion. Methods A total of 300 elective orthopedic surgery patients were divided into two groups by ball touching grouping method. Control group(n=150)received blood transfusion guided by conventional coagulation indicators, while the research group(n=150)received blood transfusion guided by TEG in monitoring of hemostatic and coagulation function. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results After surgery, prothrombin time(PT)and activated partial thrombin time in the research group were significantly shorter, and FIB was significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05); the amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24 h blood loss, and the amount of fresh frozen plasma, suspended red blood cells, hemoglobin and platelets in the research group were significantly less than those in the control group(P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions was 1.33% in the research group, which was significantly lower than 8.67% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion During elective orthopedic surgery, the implementation of TEG in monitoring hemostatic and coagulation function in guiding blood transfusion can maintain stability of coagulation function, control the amount of blood loss and the amount of blood products, and reduce the - occurrence of adverse reactions after blood transfusion.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (18)
  • 刘娜, 马庆杰, 金华. 血栓弹力图用于脊柱外科手术中自体血回输的监测[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(8): 1151-1153.
    张星晨, 郑欣, 孙玛骥, 等. 骨科围手术期血栓弹力图的应用研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志: 电子版, 2017, 11(1): 83-86.
    赵芬, 袭洁, 何颂雄, 等. 血栓弹力图在成人复杂心脏手术体外循环成分输血中的指导作用[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(33): 53-55.
    林就孟, 张颖, 曾灏, 等. 血小板抗体协同血栓弹力图检测对心脏手术围术期输血的指导作用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2019, 16(34): 100-103.
    邵长峰, 秦丽凤, 赵真, 等. 血栓弹力图和常规凝血参数在指导肝移植术中输血率的回顾性分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2019, 32(11): 1137-1140.
    中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南-骨科分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 110-114.
    中华医学会麻醉学分会. 2014版中国麻醉学指南与专家共识[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 207-214.
    刘树仁, 董昭良, 王帅, 等. 血栓弹力图在胸腰椎结核围手术期凝血功能评价中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2019, 41(20): 3094-3097.
    刘玢, 朱跃辉, 何丽婷, 等. 两次PDCA循环持续改进骨科手术用血合理率及输血病历缺陷率[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2019, 25(4): 572-577.
    北京医学会输血医学分会, 北京医师协会输血专业专家委员会. 患者血液管理—术前贫血诊疗专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(30): 2386-2392.
    刘效敏, 张玥, 李华文, 等. 骨科大手术后静脉血栓栓塞症的危险因素研究[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2019, 29(18): 53-57.
    张春丽, 牛梦林, 吴寒, 等. 术中大量输血对恶性肿瘤患者血栓弹力图和凝血功能的影响[J]. 北京医学, 2019, 41(10): 932-934.
    刘磊, 纪艳, 张丽英, 等. 肝素酶纠正血栓弹力图对围术期患者凝血功能的监测结果[J]. 北华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 20(3): 373-375.
    李清, 龙艳喜, 杨鑫, 等. 血栓弹力图与Sonoclot分析对上消化道出血患者应用白眉蛇毒血凝酶治疗后凝血功能检测效果比较[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(11): 1352-1355.
    黄静, 闫新明. 血栓弹力图及常规凝血功能与多发伤患者创伤严重程度的研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(9): 804-807.
    鲁双艳, 陈会欣, 刘娟, 等. 武汉某三甲医院确立血栓弹力图参考值范围的探讨[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2019, 32(6): 440-442.
    梁翠铭, 黄敏, 梁昭清, 等. 血栓弹力图在大量输血中的应用[J]. 北京医学, 2019, 41(10): 926-928.
    李小彦. 血栓弹力图对临床输血的指导价值分析[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(2): 138-140.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WAN Jiangwei, CHENG Dongru, WANG Tao, GAO Ping. Value of serum lactate dehydrogenase, β2 microglobulin and ferritin combined with modified WHO-based Prognostic Scoring System in predicting poor prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(5): 79-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233107
    [2]XIE Fang, JIANG Xinting, ZHANG Rui, HUA Yang, LIANG Li. Consistency and accuracy of four prognostic scoring systems in predicting prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 52-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232326
    [3]LIU Lijing, MA Hongxin, DU Rui, DI Xiaoling, GU Hua. Effect of a new lung ultrasound scoring method in evaluation of disease condition of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and its application in treatment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(21): 111-114. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221820
    [4]SONG Linke, JIANG Jue, WANG Juan, ZHOU Qi. Value of artificial intelligence assisted scoring system combined with ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 7-10. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201478
    [5]SONG Xiaoling, LIU Xianying, LONG Xiaoqiu. Effect of modified early MEWS score system on triage efficacy for emergency patients with chest pain[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (22): 19-21. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201722007
    [6]CAI Xinyu, JIANG Lin, CAO Jing. Value of modified early warning scoring system for emergency patients in department of internal medicine[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (4): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201704009
    [7]XIONG Jie, LAI Xin, YANG Rong. Comparative study on ICNSS, APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ scoring system in evaluation of treatment status of emergency patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (22): 21-23. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201622007
    [8]HAN Shanqin, ZHOU Yuping, DING Yuqin. Application of APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in evaluation of nursing risk in patients with respiratory failure complicated with AECOPD[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (22): 18-20. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201622006
    [9]WANG Kai, JIN Nuyun, WEI Shuangqin, LI Yuqin. Application of Rockall risk scoring system in patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (3): 15-18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201403005
    [10]HUANG Kegang. Relationships between acute physiology and chronic health evaluation system Ⅲ, oxygenation index and prognosis of senile severe pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (5): 24-25,32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201305006

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(26)

    1. 赖惠菲，赖亮，李小斌，许春华. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗直径小于2cm肾结石后应用结石通胶囊联合盐酸坦索罗辛临床观察. 实用中医药杂志. 2024(01): 85-87 .
    2. 曹滨，何永欢，丁勇. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的效果观察. 大医生. 2024(05): 56-58 .
    3. 谢奕彪，崔小健. 输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗直径≤2 cm的肾结石的疗效及对肾功能和炎症相关指标的影响. 中国内镜杂志. 2024(05): 75-81 .
    4. 聂武刚. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石清除效果及应激指标的影响. 医学信息. 2024(12): 115-118 .
    5. 张恒志. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术对肾结石患者肾功能指标、并发症发生率及生活质量的影响. 中国医学创新. 2024(17): 33-37 .
    6. 方晖东，刘俊峰，潘佐，乔璐，刘智超. 输尿管软镜碎石术在2 cm左右肾结石中的应用价值. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版). 2024(03): 17-20 .
    7. 刘国政. 不同碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石逃逸和肾功能的影响. 中国激光医学杂志. 2024(05): 263-268 .
    8. 黎德林，黄恒海，陈值权，龙勇新，林圣皓. 输尿管软镜联合可视穿刺F4.8超微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾多发性结石的临床研究. 中国医药科学. 2023(01): 187-191 .
    9. 王培龙，李笑然，何藄琪，马腾，符小宝，包军胜，杨宁强. 单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(02): 101-104+112 . 本站查看
    10. 霍建武，张金刚. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术对直径2～3 cm肾结石患者肾功能的影响研究. 中国医药科学. 2023(12): 145-148 .
    11. 郝强，焦宗久，牛忠涛，石丽佳，张淑敬. mPCNL与RIRS对直径>2cm肾结石患者肾功能及氧化应激指标的影响. 临床误诊误治. 2023(06): 103-107 .
    12. 陈王超. 输尿管导管与斑马导丝对URL中输尿管损伤的预防效果. 淮海医药. 2023(04): 383-386 .
    13. 张小军，张立国，高海洋，刘健，曹凤宏，张金存，王勇，高伟兴. 输尿管软镜碎石术联合叶金排石胶囊治疗直径小于2 cm肾结石临床疗效分析. 中华中医药学刊. 2022(01): 212-215 .
    14. 张家杰，徐方明，潘高宇，葛波，肖宁，韦开禄. 硕通镜钬激光碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石(<2cm)疗效及应激反应指标变化的比较. 中国性科学. 2022(01): 23-26 .
    15. 谢强. 输尿管镜下钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管对比研究. 甘肃医药. 2022(02): 137-138+143 .
    16. 冯德胜，张亚旗，周东方. 超微经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗男性长径≥2.0 cm肾结石的效果比较. 中国实用医刊. 2022(07): 17-20 .
    17. 林燕娇. 疼痛护理干预对急诊肾结石患者疼痛程度、生理应激反应及睡眠质量的影响分析. 中外医疗. 2022(05): 154-157+162 .
    18. 刘旭东，杜勇，李志远，何正宇. 复杂肾结石患者行经皮肾镜、输尿管软镜单一及联合治疗效果、炎症指标及安全性对比研究. 实用医院临床杂志. 2022(04): 102-105 .
    19. 卓兴宇，张云，陈从其. 经尿道输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的临床研究. 实用中西医结合临床. 2022(15): 63-65+81 .
    20. 潘中义，张世清，熊玉龙. 输尿管支架在输尿管软镜治疗2～3cm肾结石的疗效及对术后排石、术后排尿症状评分的影响分析. 世界复合医学. 2022(09): 119-123 .
    21. 王刚，章钟，张国华，徐启鹏，汪锡兴，江金龙，潘周辉. F16微通道与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术临床疗效比较. 中国临床医生杂志. 2021(04): 469-471 .
    22. 王勤军. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石效果观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(07): 126-128 .
    23. 霍自豪. 电子输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石对肾结石患者清石率、机体应激反应及Cys-C、KIM-1水平的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(28): 91-93 .
    24. 朱晨迪，郑鹏毅，周真真. 输尿管硬镜负压组合式吸引鞘在肾结石患者术中的应用效果与安全性观察. 云南医药. 2021(06): 533-535+529 .
    25. 陈然，潘晓明，田慷. 经输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的效果分析. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2021(24): 74-77 .
    26. 高景宇，王磊，罗子靖，徐哲，张晔. 尿液白介素-6和肿瘤坏死因子-α表达水平与输尿管结石钬激光碎石术后输尿管痉挛的相关性研究. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版). 2020(12): 76-80 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (351) PDF downloads (17) Cited by(26)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return