YANG Huiping, HAN Denglei. Comparision of two surgerical methods in treating cataract patients with high myopia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 80-83. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022023
Citation: YANG Huiping, HAN Denglei. Comparision of two surgerical methods in treating cataract patients with high myopia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 80-83. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022023

Comparision of two surgerical methods in treating cataract patients with high myopia

More Information
  • Received Date: August 17, 2020
  • Available Online: December 21, 2020
  • Published Date: December 02, 2020
  • Objective To compare clinical effect of phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction with small incision in patients with cataract and high myopia. Methods A total of 100 patients with cataract and high myopia who underwent surgeries were selected, and were randomly divided into study group(extracapsular cataract extraction with small incision)and control group(phacoemulsification), with 50 cases in each group. The clinical effects and changes of corneal endothelial cells were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of corneal edema in the study group was 14.00%, which was significantly lower than 32.00% in the control group(P<0.05). The visual acuity after operation was significantly higher than that before operation(P<0.05), but there was no between-group significant difference before and after operation(P>0.05). The ratios of hexagonal cells in pupillary zone and corneal endothelial cell density in the pupil area after treatment were significantly lower in the two groups than those before treatment(P<0.05), but there were no between-group significant differences before and after treatment(P>0.05). Conclusion Phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction with small incisionare are both effective clinical procedures in the treatment of cataract and high myopia, they can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients, but the latter procedure can reduce the incidence of postoperative corneal edema, and has higher safety.
  • 袁霞. 小切口白内障囊外摘除与超声乳化白内障摘除对硬核白内障的效果对比[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(5): 575-577.
    江音, 史伟云, 李凤洁, 等. 双切口囊外白内障摘除术治疗低角膜内皮细胞数硬核白内障的疗效探讨[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2020, 56(2): 126-130.
    王淑英, 王金霞, 牟丽丽. 影响超声乳化术治疗高度近视合并白内障术后视力恢复的因素[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(6): 975-977.
    鲍忠宝. 小切口白内障囊外摘除术与白内障超声乳化术在硬核白内障中的治疗效果对比研究[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2018, 38(A01): 444-445.
    张利科, 王晓冰, 邓秀静. 人工晶状体植入术治疗高度近视合并白内障患者的临床疗效及对患者视觉质量与生活质量的影响[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2018, 36(5): 669-671

    , 679.
    高朋芬, 唐永萍, 陈三杰, 等. 穿透性角膜移植术后极低角膜内皮细胞密度白内障行超声乳化术疗效观察[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2019, 28(4): 311-313.
    阮燕飞. 超声乳化及小切口白内障摘除术对白内障患者角膜内皮细胞及中央角膜厚度的影响[J]. 山东医药, 2018, 58(13): 71-73.
    林云志, 李卫, 朱靖, 等. 超声乳化术对轴性高度近视合并白内障患者角膜内皮细胞的影响[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 438-441.
    严槟, 周怀胜, 皮柳青, 等. 白内障合并高度近视患者行超声乳化术的疗效分析[J]. 广东医学, 2018, 39(15): 2320-2323.
    赵丽, 胡小凤, 许邦丽. 白内障现代囊外摘除人工晶体植入术的疗效分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(1): 86-88

    , 99.
    程萍, 杨艳风, 王伟, 等. 超声乳化术治疗白内障合并高度近视疗效的影响因素[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(2): 297-299.
    高青松, 邸新, 何伟. 飞秒激光辅助的白内障手术与传统超声乳化手术对角膜内皮细胞形态及功能的影响比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(4): 671-673.
    陈奇, 李敏. 超声乳化术对伴有糖尿病的白内障患者角膜内皮的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(10): 1786-1791.
    陈炳衡, 柯妍, 汤秀娟, 等. 飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后角膜内皮细胞变化及其影响因素的临床分析[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2018, 26(4): 335-339.
    高玉敬, 张爽, 洪云, 等. 现代小切口囊外摘除术和超声乳化摘除术治疗白内障的效果以及对视神经纤维层和黄斑区厚度的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2019, 31(9): 78-81.
    辜臻晟, 陈孝霞, 龚莹莹, 等. 超高度近视性白内障超声乳化术后的视功能分析[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2018, 20(9): 561-565.
    乔小丽. 两种术式治疗高度近视合并白内障的效果比较分析[J]. 西南国防医药, 2019, 29(3): 350-352.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 苏哲,卢艳,袁青,潘雪,刘鹏飞. 近视患者角膜生物力学参数与像差的相关性分析. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(06): 108-112 . 本站查看
    2. 李娜,黄海,杨宇. 糖尿病性白内障患者2种眼科手术方法的临床疗效比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(13): 111-113+118 . 本站查看
    3. 毛凡,魏小娟. 超声乳化手术在白内障合并高度近视患者治疗中的应用效果. 贵州医药. 2023(07): 1062-1064 .
    4. 展复霞,刘志跃,赵雁玲. 超声乳化联合人工晶体植入术在治疗白内障合并高度近视患者的临床效果. 世界复合医学. 2023(08): 103-105+109 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (287) PDF downloads (12) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return