WANG Jian, CHEN Cheng, KE Liangliang. Early versus elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 36-38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023012
Citation: WANG Jian, CHEN Cheng, KE Liangliang. Early versus elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 36-38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023012

Early versus elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis

More Information
  • Received Date: September 10, 2020
  • Available Online: December 20, 2020
  • Objective To compare the clinical effect of early and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods Totally 84 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis were divided into early group(treated within 72 hours after onset)and selective group(treated from 72 to 96 hours after onset). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first time to bed-off activity after operation, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospital stay, postoperative abdominal drainage volume and total hospitalization costs, conversion rate to laparotomy and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, the first time to bed-off activity after operation, recovery time of gastrointestinal function and hospital stay of the early group were significantly shorter than those of the selective group, and the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative abdominal drainage volume and hospitalization costs were significantly less than those of the selective group(P<0.05). The conversion rate to laparotomy in the early group was 2.38%, which was significantly lower than 21.43% in the selective group(P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the early group was 2.38%, which was significantly lower than 19.05% in the selective group(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective in the treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis within 72 hours after onset, which can shorten the operation time and hospital stay, reduce the conversion rate to laparotomy and the incidence of complications.
  • 皮儒先, 龙玉屏, 樊惠菱, 等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎并发胆结石的安全性及预后评估[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(2): 198-199

    , 202.
    喻学武. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后不同手术时机对老年急性结石性胆囊炎患者疗效的影响[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 18(5): 360-362.
    叶朕雄, 汤旻, 李桢, 等. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术后胆囊不同切除时机对急性胆囊炎患者手术效果的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(3): 12-14.
    胡军, 胡汉卿, 郑军. 高危急性胆囊炎经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后胆囊切除时机探讨[J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2018, 24(3): 30-31

    , 74.
    施凉潘, 黄顺涵, 郑志华, 等. 急性重症胆囊炎手术时机选择分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 19(13): 691-694.
    陈晟. 实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者手术时机选择和临床效果分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 19(2): 303-304.
    李泉, 张程鹏. 老年急性胆囊炎经不同时机腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的临床疗效观察[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 43(5): 720-721.
    沈晓峰, 张进, 张海, 等. 短时间窗内腹腔镜胆囊切除术对急性胆囊炎患者肝功能、炎症反应及预后的影响分析[J]. 现代医学, 2019, 15(11): 1360-1362.
    施凉潘, 黄顺涵, 郑志华, 等. 急性重症胆囊炎手术时机选择分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(2): 225-229.
    杨如高, 连立之, 张佳文. 手术时机选择对结石嵌顿性胆囊炎患者临床预后的影响[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2018, 30(2): 122-125.
    林杰, 邱堃, 吴元清, 等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术对重症胆囊炎患者的临床效果及炎症因子的影响[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2019, 24(1): 53-56.
    刘军辉, 李小军. 老年胆囊结石并发胆囊炎患者应用腹腔镜手术治疗的效果分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 21(23): 1239-1241.
    王新宁, 卜震. 应用腹腔镜治疗急性胆囊炎的手术时机及其对临床疗效的影响[J]. 江苏医药, 2018, 16(5): 270-273.
    徐建庆, 买赛虎, 杨喜佳, 等. 腹腔镜手术治疗复杂性胆囊炎临床疗效研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2019, 48(2): 42-44

    , 62.
    张宇航, 马艳波, 杜青. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎手术时机的选择[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2018, 33(5): 366-368.

Catalog

    Article views (369) PDF downloads (9) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return