XI Xiangyang. Comparison of two surgeries in treating moderate to severe mixed hemorrhoids[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 59-61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023019
Citation: XI Xiangyang. Comparison of two surgeries in treating moderate to severe mixed hemorrhoids[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 59-61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023019

Comparison of two surgeries in treating moderate to severe mixed hemorrhoids

More Information
  • Received Date: September 21, 2020
  • Available Online: December 20, 2020
  • Objective To investigate the clinical effect of traditional internal ligation as well as external exlising and automatic hemorrhoid ligation combined with external excision in the treatment of moderate to severe mixed hemorrhoids. Methods A total of 92 patients with moderate to severe mixed hemorrhoids were selected, and were divided into study group and control group according to the random number table method. The control group(n=46)was treated with traditional internal ligation as well as external exlising, and the study group was treated with automatic hemorrhoids ligation combined with external resection. The related indexes, clinical effect and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time, wound healing time and hospitalization time of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group(P<0.05). The total effective rate of clinical treatment in the study group was 95.65%, which was significantly higher than 80.43% in the control group(P<0.05). The total complication rate of the study group was 23.91%, which was significantly lower than 54.35% of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Automatic hemorrhoid ligation combined with external resection for moderate and severe mixed hemorrhoids has remarkable curative effect, and it has minimal invasion, and less complications.
  • 洪琛, 刘伟, 杨鹏, 等. 自动痔疮套扎术与外剥内扎术治疗妊娠合并痔疮的临床疗效和安全性对比[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(15): 3575-3577.
    周庆健, 卢润广. M-M与RPH治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效及并发症比较[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2018, 24(1): 45-49.
    耿桂飞, 徐厚兰, 刘伟, 等. 自动痔疮套扎术痔上黏膜多平面套扎法治疗混合痔伴直肠黏膜脱垂的临床效果[J]. 浙江医学, 2018, 40(21): 65-67.
    殷毅, 吴桂喜, 王伟杰, 等. 自动痔疮套扎术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔患者的有效性分析[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(18): 3724-3727.
    马勇, 吴伟强, 杨建栋, 等. RPH联合外痔切除术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ期混合痔的临床分析[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2019, 40(1): 35-40.
    丛章龙, 武雅坤. 老年患者重度痔RPH-4辅助痔切除术的疗效观察[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2019, 28(7): 584-586.
    冯轩. 痔疮自动套扎术治疗内痔30例临床疗效报告[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(5): 68-69.
    胡立强, 席志强. 串联式套扎法结合外痔切除术治疗老年混合痔患者的临床观察[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2018, 24(1): 42-45.
    丁美胜. Ⅲ~Ⅳ期混合痔患者不同手术方案治疗的随机对照研究[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 43(5): 780-782.
    马勇, 吴伟强, 杨建栋, 等. RPH联合外痔切除术治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期混合痔的临床分析[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2019, 40(1): 29-34.
    梁家基, 肖柳. 自动痔疮套扎联合外切术和传统内扎外切术治疗老年重度痔疮的效果对比[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 255(3): 130-132.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 黄梦钰,王雅梅. 非编码RNA在口腔鳞状细胞癌耐药机制中的研究进展. 医学研究杂志. 2024(05): 22-26 .
    2. 王军成,兰彦平,赵岳阳,蒯涛,马东明,李敏. LINK-A RNAi慢病毒载体构建及其抑制U251胶质瘤细胞增殖的研究. 宁夏医学杂志. 2023(07): 577-580+572 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (338) PDF downloads (4) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return