CHEN Dong, ZHU Feng, GONG Jie, GENG Dechun, WANG Dechao. Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 92-95, 100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210383
Citation: CHEN Dong, ZHU Feng, GONG Jie, GENG Dechun, WANG Dechao. Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 92-95, 100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210383

Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture

More Information
  • Received Date: January 19, 2021
  • Available Online: April 29, 2021
  • Published Date: April 27, 2021
  •   Objective  To observe perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture.
      Methods  A total of 70 patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures were selected and randomly divided into modified group and conventional group, with 35 cases in each group. The conventional group was operated through the conventional ilioinguinal approach, and the modified group was given modified Stoppa approach surgery. The operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, incision length, hospital stay and postoperative Visual Analogue of Pain (VAS) were compared between the two groups. The levels of serum cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) before and after operation were compared between the two groups. The Majeed function score and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.
      Results  The operation time, incision length and hospital stay of the modified group were significantly shorter, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than those of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The NE, E and Cor levels after operation in the modified group were significantly higher than before operation, but were lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The scores of sexual function and gait in the modified group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group after operation (P < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the modified group was 17.14%, which was significantly lower than 40.00% in the conventional group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Modified Stoppa surgery can shorten operative time, reduce bleeding loss and postoperative complications, accelerate postoperative recovery, and relieve stress response.
  • [1]
    SCHATZKER J, MCBROOM R, BRUCE D. The tibial plateau fracture: The toronto experience 1968-1975[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 138: 94-104. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/445923
    [2]
    王钢. 关于骨盆与髋臼骨折治疗的再思考[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 16(5): 369-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2014.05.001
    [3]
    黄长智, 陈挺霖, 李平, 等. 联合入路治疗复杂骨盆骨折合并髋臼骨折1例及文献复习[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018, 20(2): 158-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201802024.htm
    [4]
    吴新宝. 骨盆与髋臼骨折的评述与展望[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019(6): 461-463. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2019.06.001
    [5]
    孙建, 郝连升, 房义辉. 不同入路方式对骨盆合并髋臼骨折患者疗效及功能恢复的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(17): 3522-3525, 3531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2019.17.036
    [6]
    王虎, 张堃, 魏星, 等. 髂腹股沟入路短支撑钢板固定髋臼后柱治疗复杂髋臼骨折[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017(1): 17-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201804013.htm
    [7]
    王春荣, 岳立群, 夏建华. 改良Stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路手术治疗骨盆和髋臼骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1301-1304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2019.12.020
    [8]
    邱贵兴. 骨盆与髋臼骨折[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006: 496-511.
    [9]
    王会祥, 汪方, 王秋根, 等. 骨盆髋臼骨折三维数字化分型系统的建立及其意义[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2013, 34(2): 119-121, 137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGK201302015.htm
    [10]
    ZYDA M. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games[J]. Computer, 2005, 38(9): 25-32. doi: 10.1109/MC.2005.297
    [11]
    VANNABOUATHONG C, SPRAGUE S, BHANDARI M. Guidelines for fracture healing assessments in clinical trials. Part Ⅰ: definitions and endpoint committees[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(3): 314-316. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.048
    [12]
    张明德. 损伤控制骨科在不稳定骨盆骨折合并多发伤治疗中的临床应用效果[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2015, 43(8): 87-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ201508028.htm
    [13]
    欧艺, 杨洪昌, 陈戈, 等. 改良Stoppa入路[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(4): 66-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201604028.htm
    [14]
    李东哲, 方跃, 邹昌, 等. 改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼前后柱骨折疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2016, 30(11): 1344-1348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXCW201611007.htm
    [15]
    郭洪章. 改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆髋臼骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 704-706. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201706024.htm
    [16]
    蔡成成, 席永斌, 罗海滨. 改良Stoppa入路内固定与外固定治疗骨盆前环骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 284-287. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201903011.htm
    [17]
    罗兴良, 吴坚, 单贤贞. 重建钢板经不同入路内固定治疗骨盆骨折的疗效[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 288-291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201903012.htm
    [18]
    韩飞, 闫景龙. 改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆髋臼骨折进展研究[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(2): 123-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201602024.htm
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 蒋佳玲,杨童玲. 1例持续性肺动脉高压合并母体HIV感染新生儿的多元个性化护理. 全科护理. 2024(24): 4742-4746 .
    2. 王风洋. 不同浓度一氧化氮联合米力农对新生儿胎粪吸入性肺炎持续肺动脉高压患儿肺氧合功能及炎性反应的影响. 中国妇幼保健. 2023(01): 48-51 .
    3. 陈顺何,李霜洁,杨夏敏. 米力农和西地那非分别联合机械通气治疗新生儿PPHN疗效评价. 中国处方药. 2023(01): 103-106 .
    4. 郑碧娟. 米力农联合酚妥拉明对新生儿肺动脉持续高压患儿动脉血气及血清炎症指标的影响. 淮海医药. 2023(04): 407-409 .
    5. 吴旭婷,凌超民,陈晓琳. 呼吸训练器联合床旁端坐法对ICU机械通气患者膈肌功能的影响. 哈尔滨医药. 2022(06): 31-33 .
    6. 刘倩,张爱梅. 高频振荡通气下西地那非联合米力农治疗新生儿持续肺动脉高压的疗效观察. 当代医学. 2021(02): 83-86 .
    7. 谭乐. 米力农联合高频通气对新生儿持续性肺动脉高压患儿血气指标的影响. 当代医学. 2021(03): 138-139 .
    8. 李明耀,陈文滨. 西地那非联合米力农治疗新生儿持续肺动脉高压疗效及对细胞因子表达的影响. 中国处方药. 2021(02): 73-74 .
    9. 王会影,范雪爱,田艳茹,李正川,靳雅玲,刘欣. 一氧化氮吸入联合高频振荡通气治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的效果分析. 中国病案. 2021(01): 96-100 .
    10. 陈尊,刘芳,邓健. 小剂量多巴胺和多巴酚丁胺静脉滴注联合高频振荡通气治疗新生儿持续肺动脉高压的临床疗效研究. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志. 2021(03): 101-105 .
    11. 柳慧. 米力农与硫酸镁单一及联合用药治疗新生儿肺动脉高压的疗效对比. 现代诊断与治疗. 2021(03): 362-363 .
    12. 李海志,王丹,李特. 米力农治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压有效性的系统评价. 中国医院用药评价与分析. 2021(03): 324-328 .
    13. 刘欣,何海英,刘利军,吴海焕. 米力农治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的Meta分析. 中国卫生标准管理. 2021(18): 100-103 .
    14. 全守东,于亚杰,梁志霞. 一氧化氮吸入联合米力农治疗新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的疗效及对血流动力学、血小板聚集功能的影响. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2020(01): 89-91 .
    15. 黄杰,乾艾娜,甘斌,何源,魏贤. 米力农对新生儿持续肺动脉高压的治疗作用评价. 中国继续医学教育. 2020(05): 131-133 .
    16. 齐丽娟. 强化护理动脉血气技术对临床诊断治疗的意义探讨. 人人健康. 2020(10): 169 .
    17. 陈波,白波,李广洪,黄学良,罗惠玲,黄惠仪. 波生坦治疗新生儿缺氧性肺动脉高压的临床观察. 中国药房. 2020(10): 1247-1252 .
    18. 蔡云. 高频振荡通气联合多巴胺治疗PPHN的效果及对氧合指数、D-D水平的影响. 数理医药学杂志. 2020(06): 857-859 .
    19. 曹玉晖,南彦武,贾永锋. 米力农和硫酸镁治疗新生儿肺动脉高压的临床效果比较. 临床医学研究与实践. 2020(29): 92-94 .
    20. 曹祎明,胡玉莲,于凤琴,王广州. 米力农联合高频震荡通气治疗新生儿缺氧性肺动脉高压的疗效及对HIF-1α ET-1 HO-1水平的影响. 安徽医学. 2020(11): 1299-1302 .
    21. 吴丹,刘颖,董世霄,翁景文,张金晶,王晓娇,黑明燕,王亚娟. 早产儿与足月儿新生儿持续性肺动脉高压临床资料的对比分析. 北京医学. 2020(12): 1201-1205 .
    22. 马兵. 分析米力农对新生儿持续性肺动脉高压的临床治疗效果. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(25): 54 .
    23. 李华,李泉泉,刘本玉. 米力农对新生儿持续肺动脉高压的疗效. 中国卫生标准管理. 2019(10): 40-42 .
    24. 王彦波,李敏,金宝,王云,陈洋,吴杰斌,刘枭,周彬. 机械通气联合西地那非对新生儿持续性肺动脉高压血流动力学及细胞因子的影响. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版). 2019(09): 659-663 .
    25. 张进军,王瑛,李海欣,张琳,王淮燕. 新生儿窒息复苏后发生持续性肺动脉高压的相关因素及预防措施. 实用临床医药杂志. 2019(20): 32-34+38 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(25)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return