CHEN Dong, ZHU Feng, GONG Jie, GENG Dechun, WANG Dechao. Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 92-95, 100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210383
Citation: CHEN Dong, ZHU Feng, GONG Jie, GENG Dechun, WANG Dechao. Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(8): 92-95, 100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210383

Observation on perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture

More Information
  • Received Date: January 19, 2021
  • Available Online: April 29, 2021
  • Published Date: April 27, 2021
  •   Objective  To observe perioperative indexes and postoperative serum stress indexes of modified Stoppa surgery in treatment of pelvic and acetabular fracture.
      Methods  A total of 70 patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures were selected and randomly divided into modified group and conventional group, with 35 cases in each group. The conventional group was operated through the conventional ilioinguinal approach, and the modified group was given modified Stoppa approach surgery. The operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, incision length, hospital stay and postoperative Visual Analogue of Pain (VAS) were compared between the two groups. The levels of serum cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) before and after operation were compared between the two groups. The Majeed function score and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.
      Results  The operation time, incision length and hospital stay of the modified group were significantly shorter, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than those of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The NE, E and Cor levels after operation in the modified group were significantly higher than before operation, but were lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). The scores of sexual function and gait in the modified group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group after operation (P < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the modified group was 17.14%, which was significantly lower than 40.00% in the conventional group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Modified Stoppa surgery can shorten operative time, reduce bleeding loss and postoperative complications, accelerate postoperative recovery, and relieve stress response.
  • [1]
    SCHATZKER J, MCBROOM R, BRUCE D. The tibial plateau fracture: The toronto experience 1968-1975[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 138: 94-104. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/445923
    [2]
    王钢. 关于骨盆与髋臼骨折治疗的再思考[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 16(5): 369-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2014.05.001
    [3]
    黄长智, 陈挺霖, 李平, 等. 联合入路治疗复杂骨盆骨折合并髋臼骨折1例及文献复习[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018, 20(2): 158-159. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201802024.htm
    [4]
    吴新宝. 骨盆与髋臼骨折的评述与展望[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019(6): 461-463. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2019.06.001
    [5]
    孙建, 郝连升, 房义辉. 不同入路方式对骨盆合并髋臼骨折患者疗效及功能恢复的影响[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(17): 3522-3525, 3531. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2019.17.036
    [6]
    王虎, 张堃, 魏星, 等. 髂腹股沟入路短支撑钢板固定髋臼后柱治疗复杂髋臼骨折[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017(1): 17-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201804013.htm
    [7]
    王春荣, 岳立群, 夏建华. 改良Stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路手术治疗骨盆和髋臼骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1301-1304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2019.12.020
    [8]
    邱贵兴. 骨盆与髋臼骨折[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006: 496-511.
    [9]
    王会祥, 汪方, 王秋根, 等. 骨盆髋臼骨折三维数字化分型系统的建立及其意义[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2013, 34(2): 119-121, 137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGK201302015.htm
    [10]
    ZYDA M. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games[J]. Computer, 2005, 38(9): 25-32. doi: 10.1109/MC.2005.297
    [11]
    VANNABOUATHONG C, SPRAGUE S, BHANDARI M. Guidelines for fracture healing assessments in clinical trials. Part Ⅰ: definitions and endpoint committees[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(3): 314-316. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.048
    [12]
    张明德. 损伤控制骨科在不稳定骨盆骨折合并多发伤治疗中的临床应用效果[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2015, 43(8): 87-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYGZ201508028.htm
    [13]
    欧艺, 杨洪昌, 陈戈, 等. 改良Stoppa入路[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(4): 66-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201604028.htm
    [14]
    李东哲, 方跃, 邹昌, 等. 改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼前后柱骨折疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2016, 30(11): 1344-1348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXCW201611007.htm
    [15]
    郭洪章. 改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆髋臼骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2017, 20(6): 704-706. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201706024.htm
    [16]
    蔡成成, 席永斌, 罗海滨. 改良Stoppa入路内固定与外固定治疗骨盆前环骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 284-287. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201903011.htm
    [17]
    罗兴良, 吴坚, 单贤贞. 重建钢板经不同入路内固定治疗骨盆骨折的疗效[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(3): 288-291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCGK201903012.htm
    [18]
    韩飞, 闫景龙. 改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆髋臼骨折进展研究[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(2): 123-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201602024.htm
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Longyu, KANG Xiaole, REN Jingpei, JIA Zhiwei. Application effects of endoscopic laminar fenestration versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(21): 1-5, 12. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241994
    [2]SHAO Rui, XU Tiantong, TIAN Rong. Research progress of application of three dimensionalfinite element model in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(20): 128-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213142
    [3]TAN Fang, WANG Jian, ZHANG Feng, HAN Shuai, SONG Xin, LI Kai. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 42-45. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210644
    [4]JU Jidong, WU Jinchun, LIU Gang. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567
    [5]WANG Liqin, FANG Jing. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgical system technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation combined with nerve root canal stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020006
    [6]FU Yuliang, ZHAO Longdui, HU Shengting, WEN Tianyi. Short-term effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus small-incision interlaminar fenestration in the treatment of the elderly with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 51-54,58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013015
    [7]YANG Jia, ZHANG Daxing. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus lumbar discectomy with vertebral fenestration in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 44-46. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005012
    [8]LIANG Miaomiao, GUO Lan, CONG Lin. Effect of transforaminal endoscopic surgery and traditional fenestration operation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and their perioperative nursing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 116-119. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913033
    [9]YANG Jia, CAO Hongqiang. Effect observation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy on treatment of patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 83-85, 89. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911023
    [10]ZHANG Qingjun, SHI Zheng. Effect of THESSYS percutaneous transformational endoscopic technique on treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (19): 56-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201419017
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 胡永胜,黄栗,潘玲玲,胡侠. 硒酵母片致尿酸升高1例. 临床合理用药. 2025(04): 164-166 .
    2. 李亚星,张俊勤. 局部晚期宫颈癌患者采用恩度配合同步放化疗治疗的效果及对血清指标的影响. 中国医药科学. 2023(22): 171-174 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (211) PDF downloads (8) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return