Advance Search
LI Yinglian, CHEN Fuqiang, WANG Jing, LIU Hong, YAN Xin, CHEN Jianfeng. Cut-off value setting of enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay reagents for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen in blood screening[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(10): 11-14, 17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210562
Citation: LI Yinglian, CHEN Fuqiang, WANG Jing, LIU Hong, YAN Xin, CHEN Jianfeng. Cut-off value setting of enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay reagents for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen in blood screening[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(10): 11-14, 17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210562
shu

Cut-off value setting of enzyme-linked immunosorbentassay reagents for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen in blood screening

  • Department of Laboratory, Blood Center of Shandong Province, Jinan, Shandong, 250014

More Information
  • Received Date: January 29, 2021
  • Available Online: June 01, 2021
  • Published Date: May 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the necessity and range of grey area of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reagents for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
      Methods  HBsAg positive sero-panels(423 copies) and HBsAg negative blood donors (2 996 copies) were detected by domestic reagent and imported reagent in parallel, and the sensitivity, specificity of the reagents under different absorbance value/threshold value(S/CO) ratio were calculated, and Yoden index was used to analyze the rationale range of grey area of two reagents.
      Results  When the S/CO ratio was 0.4, the domestic reagent had the largest index(0.957), and the imported reagent had the largest index(0.971) when the S/CO ratio was 0.7.
      Conclusion  If HBsAg of the blood donor is tested for 1 time by ELISA reagents, it is necessary to set the gray zone for reagents in our laboratory. The cut-off value should be 0.4 and above for domestic ELISA kits, while ≥0.7 for imported kits.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    潘彤, 谢月娜, 黄力勤, 等. 京津冀血站献血者及血液检测策略分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2018, 31(10): 1106-1110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201810008.htm
    [2]
    陈善华, 朱丽莉, 李浩, 等. ELISA方法检测HBsAg设置灰区的必要性探讨[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2013, 26(10): 1013-1014. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201310025.htm
    [3]
    张秀慧, 余加宏, 钟政荣, 等. ELISA法检测HBsAg灰区和单试剂反应性样本的确认结果分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2015, 17(3): 224-226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2015.03.010
    [4]
    王庆敏, 冯晨晨, 蒋昵真, 等. 国内常用7家HBsAg酶免检测试剂盒灰区临界值的确定[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2017, 30(3): 279-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201703016.htm
    [5]
    陈洪生, 陈佳微, 张三明, 等. ELISA"灰区"范围的设定对献血者血液检测安全和血源保护的意义[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2015, 28(9): 1140-1141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201509034.htm
    [6]
    王瑞, 张婧, 陈瑜, 等. HBsAg酶联免疫吸附试验灰区设置研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2016, 37(21): 2956-2958. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2016.21.003
    [7]
    梁振昌. 乙肝HBsAg酶联免疫吸附试验检测信号灰区与血清免疫逃逸变异HBsAg的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(7): 179-180, 183. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201707061
    [8]
    李英莲. 核酸检测技术在山东省济南地区献血者血液筛查中的应用效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(15): 8-10, 13. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202015002
    [9]
    王建康, 周艳, 李晶, 等. 宝鸡市2010-2016年无偿献血者核酸检测结果分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2018, 31(6): 642-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201806021.htm
    [10]
    余占娟, 王月霞, 吕豪, 等. 乙型肝炎病毒核酸检测降低输血感染残余风险的初步评估[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2017, 31(6): 534-536. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9279.2017.06.012
    [11]
    钱江, 蔡隽, 华重千, 等. ELISA与NAT检测在血液HBV筛查中的关系研究[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(12): 1322-1324. doi: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2019.41.12.2018-3279
    [12]
    蔡丽娜, 朱绍汶, 周春, 等. 2010-2013年中国南京地区无偿献血人群HBV、HCV、HIV感染情况分析[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2014, 22(4): 1089-1093. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYSY201404040.htm
    [13]
    夏传友, 刘志泉, 陈永飞, 等. 佛山市顺德区无偿献血者核酸检测情况分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2017, 30(8): 935-937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201708036.htm
    [14]
    古醒辉, 叶贤林, 杜鹏, 等. 深圳市无偿献血人群HBsAg筛查阳性的血清学特性检测分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2014, 27(4): 375-378. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201404012.htm
    [15]
    周豪杰, 李然, 游冉冉. HBsAg(+)/NAT(-)献血者HBsAg定量检测及血清学特征[J]. 中国热带医学, 2017, 17(6): 581-584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RDYX201706013.htm
    [16]
    陈显, 胡文佳, 黄成垠, 等. 献血者ELISA检测为灰区标本的确证试验与核酸检测情况分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2015, 28(2): 198-199. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201502037.htm
    [17]
    王立林, 卢亮, 聂冬梅, 等. 2种核酸筛查系统对血清学阳性献血者检测结果的分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2015, 28(9): 1090-1093. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BLOO201509012.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 徐颖. 多层螺旋CT联合核磁共振成像增强扫描在胰腺癌及慢性胰腺炎鉴别诊断中的价值分析. 大医生. 2024(01): 127-129 .
    2. 高成强，毕司星，李立新. CT平扫联合增强扫描在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(02): 31-33 .
    3. 侯胜楠. CT、MRI增强扫描对胰腺癌与慢性胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值. 中华养生保健. 2024(07): 176-180 .
    4. 柳群力，朱鸷翔. CT联合分泌型卷曲受体蛋白4及可溶性生长刺激表达基因2蛋白对恶性胆道梗阻患者术后并发胰腺炎的诊断价值. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(05): 59-62+67 . 本站查看
    5. 郑北. 联合应用CT、MRI增强扫描鉴别诊断胰腺癌与慢性胰腺炎的价值. 中国医疗器械信息. 2024(08): 12-14+25 .
    6. 曹中立. 多层螺旋CT在胰腺癌术前评估及诊断中的应用价值. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(10): 132-134 .
    7. 杨懿，黄新蓉. MRI与CT检查诊断急性胰腺炎的价值比较研究. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(14): 135-137+140 .
    8. 董源涛，尚金红，袁燕丽. MRI联合CT在胰腺肿瘤中的诊断价值. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(16): 137-139 .
    9. 游红莲，闫明艳，褚千琨，王芳芳，陈文晶，于根建，王静. 隐匿性小胰腺癌并急性胰腺炎与单纯性急性胰腺炎的CT对比分析. 临床误诊误治. 2024(17): 63-68 .
    10. 刘强. 多层螺旋CT与MRI扫描鉴别诊断胰腺癌和胰腺炎的有效性探讨. 影像研究与医学应用. 2024(19): 24-26 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(11)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return