Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation

TAN Fang; WANG Jian; ZHANG Feng; HAN Shuai; SONG Xin; LI Kai

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20210644

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2021 > 25(12): 42-45. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210644

TAN Fang, WANG Jian, ZHANG Feng, HAN Shuai, SONG Xin, LI Kai. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 42-45. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210644

Citation:

PDF (607 KB)

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation

TAN Fang^{1, 2},
WANG Jian^1, ,,
ZHANG Feng¹,
HAN Shuai¹,
SONG Xin¹,
LI Kai¹

1.
Department of Orthopedics, Pudong New Area People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, 201299
2.
Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong, 264003

More Information

Received Date: February 07, 2021
Available Online: July 04, 2021
Published Date: June 27, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To explore clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation.
Methods Retrospective analysis was performed for clinical data of 12 patients with high lumbar disc herniation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and lumbar Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by modified MacNab efficacy assessment criteria at the 12-month follow-up.
Results All 12 patients successfully underwent MISTLIF, with operating time of (118.33±15.86) min, intraoperative blood loss of (114.17±39.42) mL, and postoperative drainage volume of (103.33±30.85) mL. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months, with follow-up time of (13.50±1.31) months. One patient had intraoperative endplate injury, slight vertebral space collapse was observed during the 3-month follow-up, and intervertebral bone fusion was achieved during the 12-month follow-up. One patient had numbness and pain in front of the thigh after surgery, which was improved after 6 months. Compared with preoperation, VAS scores and ODI of 12 patients were significantly decreased in each period after operation (P < 0.05).
Conclusion Application of MISTLIF in treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation has a satisfactory clinical effect and has the advantages of safety, effectiveness, and less trauma.
- upper lumbar disc herniation,
- minimally invasive therapy,
- transforaminal approach,
- lumbar interbody fusion

FullText(HTML)

References (20)

References

[1]	KIM D S, LEE J K, JANG J W, et al. Clinical features and treatments of upper lumbar disc herniations[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2010, 48(2): 119-124. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.2.119
[2]	胡慧敏, 王哲, 罗卓荆, 等. 椎板减压经椎间孔椎间盘切除椎间融合内固定治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2010, 20(7): 537-540. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2010.07.03
[3]	YVCE I, KAHYAOĜLU O, MERTAN P, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical results of upper lumbar disc herniations[J]. Neurochirurgie, 2019, 65(4): 158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.04.002
[4]	JHA R T, SYED H R, CATALINO M, et al. Contralateral approach for minimally invasive treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: technical note and case series[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 100: 583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.059
[5]	SON S, LEE S G, KIM W K, et al. Advantages of a microsurgical translaminar approach (keyhole laminotomy) for upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 119: e16-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.004
[6]	KARAASLAN B, ASLAN A, BÖRCEK A Ö, et al. Clinical and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations: a retrospective study[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2017, 47(4): 1157-1160. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156856
[7]	DELGADO-LÓPEZ P D, RODRÍGUEZ-SALAZAR A, MARTÍN-ALONSO J, et al. Lumbar disc herniation: Natural history, role of physical examination, timing of surgery, treatment options and conflicts of interests[J]. Neurocirugia: Astur, 2017, 28(3): 124-134. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28130015
[8]	梁成民, 崔西龙, 于海洋, 等. 高位腰椎间盘突出症的解剖学特点及术式选择[J]. 中国骨伤, 2016, 29(7): 640-644. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.07.011
[9]	吾提江·卡斯木, 黄卫民, 努尔买买提·巴哈夏尔, 等. 两种术式治疗腰椎间盘突出症的解剖学研究及疗效对比[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志志, 2015, 23(1): 41-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS201501010.htm
[10]	胡慧敏, 王哲, 罗卓荆, 等. 椎板减压经椎间孔椎间盘切除椎间融合内固定治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2010, 20(7): 537-540. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2010.07.03
[11]	李松凯倪斌, 蓝旭张军华王世勇甄平文益民. 经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2014, 17(1): 20-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2014.01.008
[12]	RUAN W, FENG F, LIU Z, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 31: 86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061
[13]	AHN S S, KIM S H, KIM D W, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for young adults: a retrospective matched cohort study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 86: 250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.047
[14]	WU J, ZHANG C, ZHENG W, et al. Analysis of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 92: 142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.127
[15]	AHN Y, LEE S H, LEE J H, et al. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration[J]. Acta Neurochir: Wien, 2009, 151(3): 199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0204-x
[16]	张同会, 徐峰, 蔡贤华, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2016, 30(2): 92-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNGY201602006.htm
[17]	ORTEGA-PORCAYO L A, LEAL-LÓPEZ A, SORIANO-LÓPEZ M E, et al. Assessment of paraspinal muscle atrophy percentage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and unilateral instrumentation using a novel contralateral intact muscle-controlled model[J]. Asian Spine J, 2018, 12(2): 256-262. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.256
[18]	GUIROY A, LANDRIEL F, ZANARDI C, et al. Post-op paraspinal atrophy: Does the approach matter[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2018, 9(suppl 4): S91-S96. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595965
[19]	PUTZIER M, HARTWIG T, HOFF E K, et al. Minimally invasive TLIF leads to increased muscle sparing of the multifidus muscle but not the longissimus muscle compared with conventional PLIF-a prospective randomized clinical trial[J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(7): 811-819. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.460
[20]	LI X C, HUANG C M, ZHONG C F, et al. Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171546

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	胡菀，朱侥侥，毛菲，龚玲丽. 酒精联合凡士林纱布包敷用于全厚层自体皮肤移植修复四肢皮肤缺损的效果. 实用临床医学. 2024(03): 91-93 .
2.	喻萍萍，孙华中，杨萌，高群，赵金都. 儿童医疗辅导照护干预模式在植入式输液港首次穿刺中的作用. 中国医刊. 2024(09): 986-990 .
3.	段梦娣，王征，马亚男. PICC置管后局部皮肤过敏患者使用氯己定醇的疗效观察. 河北医药. 2023(09): 1370-1372+1376 .
4.	赵静，石庆，张丽. 酒精湿敷治疗老年PICC置管固定敷贴致皮肤过敏的疗效分析. 皮肤病与性病. 2021(04): 482+485 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (354) PDF downloads (15) Cited by(4)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content