Analysis in sensitivity and virulence gene detection of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> to frequently-used antibiotics in clinical practice

LIU Yajing; LIU Qinqin

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20211022

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2021 > 25(5): 101-105. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211022

LIU Yajing, LIU Qinqin. Analysis in sensitivity and virulence gene detection of Staphylococcus aureus to frequently-used antibiotics in clinical practice[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(5): 101-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211022

Citation:

PDF (866 KB)

Analysis in sensitivity and virulence gene detection of Staphylococcus aureus to frequently-used antibiotics in clinical practice

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Changqing Oilfield Staff Hospital in Xi'an City of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710201

More Information

Received Date: December 18, 2020
Available Online: March 22, 2021
Published Date: March 14, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To analyze the sensitivity and results of virulence gene detection of Staphylococcus aureus to frequently-used antibiotics in clinical practice.
Methods Totally 129 isolated strains of Staphylococcus aureus from sterile body fluid samples of pleural effusion, ascites, cerebrospinal fluid and blood were prepared for drug sensitivity test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of frequently-used antibiotics such as vancomycin to Staphylococcus aureus was detected by agar dilution method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect endoresistant genes of mecC and mecA, virulence gene of sasX and panton-valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Results The dilution of oxacillin agar showed that there were 70 strains of MRSA and 59 strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). The PCR primers of genes of mecA and mecC for 45 strains of isolated MRSA in clinic showed that positive detection rate of mecA was 100.00%, the positive detection rate of sasX was 46.67%(21/45), the negative detection rate of sasX was 53.33%(24/45), and mecC as well as PVL were not detected. MRSA showed a higher drug resistance rate to β amides and certain drug resistance to non β amides such as levofloxacin, amikacin and gentamicin, but more than 75.00% of MRSA were sensitive to trimethoprim and rifampicin. MSSA were sensitive to both β amides and non β amides, and the drug resistance rate was lower than 11.00%; MRSA with negative or positive sasX were resistant to antibiotics such as levofloxacin, fosfomycin and β amides, but the drug resistance rates of sasX negative genes and sasX positive genes to trimethoprim, rifampicin, amikacin and gentamicin were not completely consistent.
Conclusion MRSA is resistant to most antibiotics in clinic, so it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of MRSA in clinic.
- Staphylococcus aureus,
- antibiotics,
- sensitivity,
- minimum inhibitory concentration,
- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

FullText(HTML)

References (16)

References

[1]	田英杰, 于慧, 王占黎. 金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性及相关耐药基因分析[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2019, 26(2): 197-200. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SPKX201503028.htm
[2]	冯宁, 刘正祥, 王晓丽, 等. 血流感染金黄色葡萄球菌分子特征及毒力基因分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019, 29(2): 161-165, 170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY201902001.htm
[3]	杨勇, 朱家红, 周永, 等. 解脲支原体对七种抗菌药物的敏感性测定及其与相关基因检测的比较[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2019, 7(13): 75-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXJH201913057.htm
[4]	LI M, DU X, VILLARUZ A E, et al. MRSA epidemic linked to a quickly spreading colonization and virulence determinant[J]. Nat Med, 2012, 18(5): 816-819. doi: 10.1038/nm.2692
[5]	杨波, 张灿灿. 呼吸道感染分离金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药性分析[J]. 中国现代医生, 2020, 58(2): 139-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS202002039.htm
[6]	朱利霞, 王洪彬, 赵希艳, 等. 狐肺炎大肠杆菌毒力基因和耐药基因检测及药物敏感性分析[J]. 中国预防兽医学报, 2019, 41(2): 138-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXQ201902006.htm
[7]	胡付品, 朱德妹, 汪复. 2014年CHINET中国细菌耐药性监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2015, 7(5): 401-410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7708.2015.05.001
[8]	朱任媛, 张小江, 徐英春, 等. 2005-2014年CHINET脑脊液分离菌分布和耐药性监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2016, 16(4): 449-454. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KGHL201604012.htm
[9]	林君, 曹利. 重庆地区金黄色葡萄球菌临床株的分子型别与耐药性检测[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2019, 40(3): 342-347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2019.03.021
[10]	詹铀超, 陈凯锐, 江雁琼, 等. 临床分离金黄色葡萄球菌ST22克隆毒力及耐药基因分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(7): 1146-1150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.07.030
[11]	刘保光, 孙华润, 翟亚军, 等. 动物源金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性、oqxAB和fexA基因流行性及spa分型研究[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2019, 39(3): 445-450. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSYX201903012.htm
[12]	寿何庆, 赵瑛, 杨甜, 等. 金黄色葡萄球菌临床菌株杀白细胞素基因携带率和耐药特点[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2020, 30(19): 2333-2335. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWJZ202019009.htm
[13]	丛萌倩. 金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性分布特征及分子流行病学研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2020, 41(11): 1382-1386. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2020.11.024
[14]	张行, 李新圃, 武小虎, 等. 牛源金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜与毒素基因检测及agr分型[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(11): 2903-2910. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2020.11.029
[15]	白耀霞, 任建元. 70株临床分离肠球菌的毒力基因检测与耐药性分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2020, 10(3): 153-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYKX202003044.htm
[16]	AKLILU E, NURHARDY A D, MOKHTAR A, et al. Molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) isolates in raw chicken meat[J]. International Food Research Journal, 2016, 23(1): 192-195. http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20163008812.html;jsessionid=3408B1FBCBFDF8977A587696C8E1173E;jsessionid=AA509B89638E09BCCB027F7737E6366E

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	王鑫. 舒芬太尼、纳布啡复合右美托咪定对腹腔镜手术患者的镇痛效果及应激反应的影响. 实用临床医学. 2023(03): 47-50 .
2.	张凤怡，王焕，薛婷婷. 前馈控制流程对全麻侧卧位手术后并发症及麻醉复苏的影响. 中华现代护理杂志. 2022(34): 4801-4806 .
3.	陈志洪，张玉乡. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者麻醉苏醒期恢复质量的影响. 临床合理用药杂志. 2021(33): 155-157 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1057) PDF downloads (70) Cited by(3)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Analysis in sensitivity and virulence gene detection of Staphylococcus aureus to frequently-used antibiotics in clinical practice

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content