CHEN Ling, CHEN Wenwei, CHEN Li, ZHANG Guoying. Correlations between area under curve of time-glucose curve of oral glucose tolerance test and perinatal outcomes in multiparas with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(19): 98-100, 106. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212937
Citation: CHEN Ling, CHEN Wenwei, CHEN Li, ZHANG Guoying. Correlations between area under curve of time-glucose curve of oral glucose tolerance test and perinatal outcomes in multiparas with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(19): 98-100, 106. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212937

Correlations between area under curve of time-glucose curve of oral glucose tolerance test and perinatal outcomes in multiparas with gestational diabetes mellitus

More Information
  • Received Date: July 20, 2021
  • Available Online: October 27, 2021
  • Published Date: October 14, 2021
  •   Objective  To explore the correlations between the area under curve (AUC) of time-glucose curve of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and perinatal outcomes in multiparas with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
      Methods  Totally 551 GDM multiparas with single fetus were selected, and they were divided into AUC ≤ 15.59 mmol/(L·h) group, AUC>15.60 to 16.79 mmol/(L·h) group, AUC>16.79 to 17.67 mmol/(L·h) group and AUC>17.67 mmol/(L·h) group. Correlations between AUC and adverse perinatal outcomes were analyzed in GDM multiparas.
      Results  There were significant differences in age and gestational weeks of delivery among the four groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes, abnormal amniotic fluid, cesarean section and postpartum hemorrhage among the four groups (P>0.05). The average birth weight of newborns in the AUC ≤ 15.59 mmol/(L·h) group was significantly higher than that in the AUC>15.59 to 16.79 mmol/(L·h) group (P < 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of neonates transferring to department of pediatrics among the AUC ≤ 15.59 mmol/(L·h) group, AUC>16.79 to 17.67 mmol/(L·h) group and AUC>17.67 mmol/(L·h) group (P < 0.05). Logistic binary regression analysis showed that AUC was significantly correlated with the incidence of neonates transferring to department of pediatrics in GDM pregnant women (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  AUC of OGTT time-glucose curve in GDM multiparas can be used as an index for evaluation of blood glucose level, and it has a certain value in predicting the incidence of neonates transferring to department of pediatrics.
  • [1]
    American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021[J]. Diabetes Care, 2021, 44(Suppl 1): S200-S210. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559233
    [2]
    PERAK A M, LANCKI N, KUANG A, et al. Associations of gestational cardiovascular health with pregnancy outcomes: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(2): e1-e17.
    [3]
    METZGER B E, COUSTAN D R, TRIMBLE E R. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes[J]. Clin Chem, 2019, 65(7): 937-938. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.303990
    [4]
    Group HSCR, METZGER B E, LOWE L P, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(19): 1991-2002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943
    [5]
    胡君, 葛智娟, 陆婧, 等. 妊娠期糖尿病对产妇远期健康的影响[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(12): 810-812. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.12.011
    [6]
    ACOG Practice Bulletin. Pregestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metabol, 2018, 10(5): 179-182.
    [7]
    GADGIL M D, OZA-FRANK R, KANDULA N R, et al. Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus in South Asian women in the United States[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2017, 33(5): 1002. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000039779630710_ed62.html
    [8]
    D'SOUZA R, HORYN I, PAVALAGANTHARAJAH S, et al. Maternal body mass index and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2019, 1(4): 100041. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100041
    [9]
    International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Working Group on Outcome, FEIG D S, CORCOY R, et al. Diabetes in pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and proposed codification of definitions[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2015, 31(7): 680-90. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2640
    [10]
    FERNANDEZ-TWINN D S, HJORT L, NOVAKOVIC B, et al. Intrauterine programming of obesity and type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetologia, 2019, 62(10): 1789-1801. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4951-9
    [11]
    FRANZAGO M, FRATICELLI F, STUPPIA L, et al. Nutrigenetics, epigenetics and gestational diabetes: consequences in mother and child[J]. Epigenetics, 2019, 14(3): 215-235. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1582277
    [12]
    SHAN D, QIU P Y, WU Y X, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women of advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study from China[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 12239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29889-3
    [13]
    黎丹, 黄剑青, 张兵, 等. 二胎政策开放后对高龄经产妇妊娠特征及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2019(01): 51-53, 56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YZWS201901013.htm
    [14]
    BLUE E K, BALLMAN K, BOYLE F, et al. Fetal hyperglycemia and a high-fat diet contribute to aberrant glucose tolerance and hematopoiesis in adult rats[J]. Pediatr Res, 2015, 77(2): 316-25. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.185
    [15]
    陶朝慧, 喻晓燕. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制效果对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(7): 1426-1429. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201707026.htm
    [16]
    罗赛赛. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制不良对母婴妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(14): 3243-3245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202114025.htm
    [17]
    王智. 孕妇血清妊娠相关蛋白、胰岛素抵抗指数与妊娠期糖尿病的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(11): 69-71. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201811019
    [18]
    孙军萍, 黎宗保, 韩耀光, 等. 妊娠糖尿病患者血清Omentin-1、IRS-1、IRS-2与胰岛素抵抗的关系[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2020, 21(1): 83-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKLC202001033.htm
    [19]
    丁武华, 陈丽萍, 王淑沂. 胰岛素不同注射方式对妊娠糖尿病患者疗效的比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, 18(12): 93-94. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201412030
    [20]
    KIM J Y, COLETTA D K, MANDARINO L J, et al. Glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in Latino adolescents[J]. Diabetes Care, 2012, 35(9): 1925-30. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2476
    [21]
    MORBIDUCCI U, DI BENEDETTO G, GAETANO L, et al. Predicting the metabolic condition after gestational diabetes mellitus from oral glucose tolerance test curves shape[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2014, 42(5): 1112-20. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-0979-7
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Longyu, KANG Xiaole, REN Jingpei, JIA Zhiwei. Application effects of endoscopic laminar fenestration versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(21): 1-5, 12. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241994
    [2]SHAO Rui, XU Tiantong, TIAN Rong. Research progress of application of three dimensionalfinite element model in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(20): 128-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213142
    [3]TAN Fang, WANG Jian, ZHANG Feng, HAN Shuai, SONG Xin, LI Kai. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 42-45. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210644
    [4]JU Jidong, WU Jinchun, LIU Gang. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating prolapsed lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200567
    [5]WANG Liqin, FANG Jing. Effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgical system technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation combined with nerve root canal stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020006
    [6]FU Yuliang, ZHAO Longdui, HU Shengting, WEN Tianyi. Short-term effect of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus small-incision interlaminar fenestration in the treatment of the elderly with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 51-54,58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013015
    [7]YANG Jia, ZHANG Daxing. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus lumbar discectomy with vertebral fenestration in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 44-46. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005012
    [8]LIANG Miaomiao, GUO Lan, CONG Lin. Effect of transforaminal endoscopic surgery and traditional fenestration operation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and their perioperative nursing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 116-119. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913033
    [9]YANG Jia, CAO Hongqiang. Effect observation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy on treatment of patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(11): 83-85, 89. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201911023
    [10]ZHANG Qingjun, SHI Zheng. Effect of THESSYS percutaneous transformational endoscopic technique on treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (19): 56-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201419017
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 胡永胜,黄栗,潘玲玲,胡侠. 硒酵母片致尿酸升高1例. 临床合理用药. 2025(04): 164-166 .
    2. 李亚星,张俊勤. 局部晚期宫颈癌患者采用恩度配合同步放化疗治疗的效果及对血清指标的影响. 中国医药科学. 2023(22): 171-174 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (328) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return