Objective To explore the clinical application value of 24-hour intraocular pressure electrogram.
Methods After unified training of 18 nursing students, each of them completed 6 copies of 24-hour intraocular pressure electrogram by manual and electronic tracing. The recording time, modification times, error points, one-time success rate and satisfaction of nursing students of two methods were investigated and compared.
Results There were significant differences in recording time, modification times, error points and one-time success rate between the two tracing methods (P < 0.05). Compared with the manual tracing, the recording time of the electronic tracing was significantly shortened and one-time success rate was significantly increased(P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the electronic tracing was significantly higher than that of the manual tracing (P < 0.05).
Conclusion 24-hour intraocular pressure electrogram has the advantages of simple operation, fast writing high quality and high satisfaction of nurses, which can effectively improve the quality of nursing.