Advance Search
GE Shuguang, ZHANG Wenxi, JIANG Zhengyu, JIANG Hui, LIU Jie. Comparison between two approaches in treatment of patients with complex tibial plateau fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214297
Citation: GE Shuguang, ZHANG Wenxi, JIANG Zhengyu, JIANG Hui, LIU Jie. Comparison between two approaches in treatment of patients with complex tibial plateau fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214297
shu

Comparison between two approaches in treatment of patients with complex tibial plateau fractures

  • Department of Orthopedics, Liyang City People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Liyang Branch of Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213300

More Information
  • Received Date: October 31, 2021
  • Available Online: February 28, 2022
  • Published Date: February 27, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the efficacy of two approaches in treating complex tibial plateau fractures and their influence on varus angle and caster angle of tibial plateau.
      Methods  A total of 109 patients with complex tibial plateau fractures were selected and divided into observation group (79 cases with treatment of internal and external approach) and control group (30 cases with treatment of posterior approach). Varus angle, caster angle of tibial plateau and motion of knee joint were measured immediately, 6 months and 1 year after operation, the therapeutic effect was assessed by Rasmussen score, and the postoperative complications were observed.
      Results  The varus angle and caster angle immediately after operation in the observation group were significantly larger than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in varus angles and caster angles 6 months and 1 year after operation and motion of knee joint 1 year after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of the observation group was 88.61%, which was significantly higher than that 80.00% of the control group (P < 0.05). The operation time and the amount of bleeding in the observation group were significantly longer and larger than those in the control group, while the fracture healing time was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in both groups.
      Conclusion  The internal and external approaches are effective in the treatment of complex tibial plateau fractures, which can significantly improve the varus angle and caster angle of tibial plateau.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (21)
  • [1]
    朱剑, 朱志军, 叶峥, 等. 前外侧锁定加压钢板结合后内侧有限切开小型锁定钢板短螺钉治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(10): 863-868. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2016.10.007
    [2]
    RAMOUTAR D N, LEFAIVRE K, BROEKHUYSE H, et al. Mapping recovery in simple and complex tibial plateau fracture fixation[J]. Bone Jo J, 2019, 101B(8): 1009-1014.
    [3]
    ARNOLD J B, TU C G, PHAN T M, et al. Characteristics of postoperative weight bearing and management protocols for tibial plateau fractures: findings from a scoping review[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(12): 2634-2642. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.040
    [4]
    张擎柱, 万乾, 张义, 等. 3D打印技术辅助后内侧倒"L"形切口三间隙显露联合前外侧入路治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2019, 18(2): 170-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2019.02.016
    [5]
    HAUBRUCK P, BRUNNEMER U, MOGHADDAM A, et al. Use of the Suprapatellar Approach in Intramedullary Nailing of a Multi-Fragmentary Dislocated Tibia Fracture with a Hypermobile Intermediate Fragment in a Young Patient[J]. Orthop Rev (Pavia), 2017, 8(4): 6738-6740.
    [6]
    AL-HOURANI K, FOWLER T, WHITEHOUSE M R, et al. Two-stage combined ortho-plastic management of type ⅢB open diaphyseal tibial fractures requiring flap coverage: is the timing of debridement and coverage associated with outcomes[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(12): 591-597. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001562
    [7]
    ELLSWORTH H S, DUBIN J R, SHAW C M, et al. Second Place Award Immediate versus delayed operative treatment of low-energy tibial plateau fractures[J]. Curr Orthop Pract, 2016, 27(4): 351-354. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000390
    [8]
    TAO X G, CHEN N, PAN F G, et al. External fixation combined with delayed internal fixation in treatment of tibial plateau fractures with dislocation[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(41): e8221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008221
    [9]
    KEATING J. Commentary on: Two-Stage Combined Ortho-plastic Management of Type ⅢB Open Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures Requiring Flap Coverage: Is the Timing of Debridement and Coverage Associated With Outcomes[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(12): 597-599. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001660
    [10]
    邱伟建, 包德明, 王驭恺, 等. 后内侧倒"L"形切口联合前外侧切口治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(10): 840-844. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2016.10.003
    [11]
    PARK J P, LAVERDIÈRE C, CORBAN J, et al. An arthroscopic procedure for restoration of posterolateral tibial plateau slope in tibial plateau fracture associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2020, 9(9): e1249-e1258. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.05.003
    [12]
    TOULOUPAKIS G, GHIRARDELLI S, BIANCARDI E, et al. A remarkable pattern of a tibial plateau fracture-use of a safe technique with practical advantages in the surgical field[J]. Acta Biomed, 2019, 90(2): 343-347.
    [13]
    蒋志余. 关节镜下前交叉韧带定位器结合空心顶棒复位固定治疗胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(20): 89-92. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213734
    [14]
    徐华生, 刘文军, 方高富, 等. 后内侧入路内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台后侧骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(6): 631-632. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS201806028.htm
    [15]
    戴勇, 崔崟, 王秀会, 等. 前外侧联合后内侧手术入路双钢板并植骨治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2016, 13(2): 51-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2016.02.014
    [16]
    ROSSMANN M, FENSKY F, OZGA A K, et al. Tibial plateau fracture: does fracture classification influence the choice of surgical approach A retrospective multicenter analysis[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2020: 1-7.
    [17]
    MILLAR S C, ARNOLD J B, THEWLIS D, et al. A systematic literature review of tibial plateau fractures: what classifications are used and how reliable and useful are they[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(3): 473-490. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.025
    [18]
    陈明亮, 谷成毅, 丁松, 等. 跗骨窦切口与传统"L"形切口治疗成人跟骨骨折疗效的Meta分析[J]. 巴楚医学, 2018, 1(4): 60-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BMJJ201804014.htm
    [19]
    梁晶亮, 雷军, 李智斌, 等. 膝关节内外侧双切口双钢板复位内固定术治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折41例[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2017, 46(6): 746-747, 762. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2017.06.025
    [20]
    衡科, 陶涛, 魏辉, 等. 不同内固定方式联合入路治疗Klammer Ⅲ型后pilon骨折效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(12): 66-69. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20210822
    [21]
    童立, 王兵, 张小海, 等. 复杂胫骨平台骨折手术临床疗效分析及手术入路探讨[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2017, 36(2): 146-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0217.2017.02.014
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 喻洁明，任荣飞，陈晓亮. 耳内镜下应用耳屏软骨-软骨膜复合体行Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的临床疗效研究. 中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学). 2024(01): 130-132+108 .
    2. 包勇正，邹文兰，胡志邦，马敬. 29例鼓膜大穿孔患者耳内镜下鼓膜成形术疗效观察. 实用临床医药杂志. 2020(23): 42-44 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (234) PDF downloads (10) Cited by(2)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return