Citation: | SUN Chennan, MAO Haiyan, WEI Benfei, HAN Xiao, LIU Shenxiang, YUAN Xin. Clinical study on 4D-CT combined with respiratory gating technology in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(15): 15-18, 25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220635 |
To explore target size, dosimetric difference, adverse reactions and clinical efficacy of radiotherapy by 4D-CT combined with respiratory gating technique in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic or primary lung cancer.
The data of 32 patients (54 lesions) with metastatic or primary lung cancer treated in the Radiotherapy Center of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University were collected. The CT data was processed by 4D software program, and 10 groups of CT images were obtained. Respiratory gating plan and conventional radiotherapy plan were made for them. The target volume and dose of the two plans were compared, and the adverse reactions and efficacy of radiotherapy were observed within 3 months after treatment.
Compared with the conventional plan, the volume of inner target area (ITV) and planning target area (PTV) under respiratory gating plan was smaller, and the dose received by 95% of PTV (D95) was higher(P < 0.05). The percentage of volume of normal lung tissue exposed to radiation doses greater than 20 Gy (V20), the percentage of volume of normal lung tissue exposed to radiation doses greater than 5 Gy (V5), mean dose of bilateral lung (MLD) and dose of spinal cord for 1 cm3 volume (D1cc) under the respiratory gating plan were significantly lower than those under the conventional plan (P < 0.05). The follow-up results showed that the incidence rate of grade 1 and 2 radiation pneumonia was 25.0%, and the total effective rate was 65.6%.
4D-CT combined with respiratory gating technology can be applied to SBRT for lung cancer, especially for patients with multiple lung metastases. It can accurately track the location of multiple tumors, ensure the effectiveness and accuracy of treatment, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions in surrounding normal tissues.
[1] |
李翔, 高申. 1990-2019年中国居民肺癌发病、患病和死亡趋势分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2021, 29(11): 821-826. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZMXB202111006.htm
|
[2] |
陈博, 杨怡萍. 呼吸门控技术在胸部肿瘤放射治疗中的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2019, 27(12): 2211-2214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2019.12.045
|
[3] |
张英杰, 徐霞, 李建彬, 等. PET-CT和4DCT结合定义非小细胞肺癌内生物靶区的放疗计划剂量学研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2019, 39(4): 274-279. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2019.04.006
|
[4] |
RATRA D, YADAV H, DALAN D, et al. Retinal vascular abnormalities in Sturge-Weber syndrome[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2019, 67(7): 1223-1226. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1840_18
|
[5] |
BALL D, MAI G T, VINOD S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in stage 1 non-small-cell lung cancer (TROG 09.02 CHISEL): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(4): 494-503. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30896-9
|
[6] |
NISHIOKA K, SHIMIZU S, SHINOHARA N, et al. Analysis of inter-and intra fractional partial bladder wall movement using implanted fiducial markers[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2017, 12(1): 44. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0778-z
|
[7] |
RIETZEL E, LIU A K, DOPPKE K P, et al. Design of 4D treatment planning target volumes[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 66(1): 287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.024
|
[8] |
明学中, 顾洁, 王凤仪, 等. 单中心多靶点立体定向放射治疗技术在多发性肺转移瘤放疗中的位置偏差研究[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2021, 34(8): 738-742. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2021.08.008
|
[9] |
张怀文, 钟晓鸣, 胡海芹, 等. VMAT旋转调强多中心照射技术在全脑全中枢放疗中的应用[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2021, 36(9): 1536-1540, 1544. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2021.09.038
|
[10] |
刘穆平, 初磊, 邓煜, 等. 呼吸门控技术以及非均整模式应用于早期非小细胞肺癌小病灶立体定向放疗的优势[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2019, 32(8): 707-710. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2019.08.009
|
[11] |
ROUABHI O, GROSS B, BAYOUTH J, et al. The dosimetric and temporal effects of respiratory-gated, high-dose-rate radiation therapy in patients with lung cancer[J]. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2019, 18: 1533033818816072.
|
[12] |
马栋辉, 刘凯, 秦永辉, 等. 非小细胞肺癌立体定向放疗后副反应的Meta分析[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2014, 37(5): 531-535, 539. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2014.05.004
|