Advance Search
HAO Xin, HU Xiaolin, WANG Mei, WU Dacheng, SUN Yunyun, HOU Sicong. Value of patient-reported outcome score combined with serological indicators in evaluating endoscopic disease activity of patients with Crohn's disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(16): 6-10. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220865
Citation: HAO Xin, HU Xiaolin, WANG Mei, WU Dacheng, SUN Yunyun, HOU Sicong. Value of patient-reported outcome score combined with serological indicators in evaluating endoscopic disease activity of patients with Crohn's disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(16): 6-10. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220865
shu

Value of patient-reported outcome score combined with serological indicators in evaluating endoscopic disease activity of patients with Crohn's disease

  • 1.

    Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001

  • 2.

    Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001

More Information
  • Received Date: March 17, 2022
  • Available Online: August 07, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objective 

    To analyze the value of patient-reported outcome (PRO) score combined with serological indicators in evaluating endoscopic disease activity of patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

    Methods 

    The clinical materials of CD patients were collected, and the correlation between PRO score and Simplified Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) was analyzed. According to the SES-CD result, the patients were divided into active phase group and remission phase group, the clinical materials were compared between the two groups, and the independent risk factors related to endoscopic disease activity were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the value of evaluation for endoscopic disease activity by each single index and their combination.

    Results 

    The PRO score was slightly positively correlated with SES-CD (r=0.394, P < 0.001). The platelet (PLT), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), plateletcrit (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and PRO score of the patients in the active phase group were significantly higher than those in the remission phase group, while the lymphocyte ratio (LY), hematocrit (HCT), mean red blood cell volume (MCV), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV) and albumin (ALB) were significantly lower than those in the remission phase group (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that PRO score, ESR and RDW were independent risk factors for endoscopic disease activity (P < 0.05). ROC curve showed that the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of PRO score combined with ESR and RDW in evaluating the endoscopic disease activity of CD patients were 80.5%, 90.0% and 0.774, respectively (P < 0.001).

    Conclusion 

    PRO score combined with ESR and RDW can increase the prediction accuracy of endoscopic disease activity in patients with CD, and is a convenient and reliable non-invasive evaluation index.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    HART L, BESSISSOW T. Endoscopic scoring systems for the evaluation and monitoring of disease activity in Crohn's disease[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2019, 38(39): 101616.
    [2]
    GERGELY M, DEEPAK P. Tools for the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2022, 51(2): 213-239. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.12.003
    [3]
    TURNER D, RICCIUTO A, LEWIS A, et al. STRIDE-Ⅱ: an update on the selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE) initiative of the international organization for the study of IBD (IOIBD): determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target strategies in IBD[J]. Gastroenterology, 2021, 160(5): 1570-1583. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.031
    [4]
    PEYRIN-BIROULET L, REINISCH W, COLOMBEL J F, et al. Clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein normalisation and mucosal healing in Crohn's disease in the SONIC trial[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(1): 88-95. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304984
    [5]
    LEWISJ D, RUTGEERTS P, FEAGANB G, et al. Correlation of stool frequency and abdominal pain measures with simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2020, 26(2): 304-313.
    [6]
    MORRIS M W, STEWART S A, HEISLER C, et al. Biomarker-based models outperform patient-reported scores in predicting endoscopic inflammatory disease activity[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2018, 24(2): 277-285. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izx018
    [7]
    WAGATSUMA K, YOKOYAMA Y, NAKASE H. Role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Life (Basel), 2021, 11(12): 1375.
    [8]
    李珍艳, 李罗红, 李小琼, 等. ALB、CRP、PLT水平变化与克罗恩病患者黏膜愈合状态的关系研究[J]. 四川医学, 2019, 40(7): 690-693. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX201907010.htm
    [9]
    MAK L Y, TONG T S M, CHEUNG K S, et al. Combined use of common fecal and blood markers for detection of endoscopically active inflammatory bowel disease[J]. ClinTranslGastroenterol, 2020, 11(3): e00138.
    [10]
    吴开春, 梁洁, 冉志华, 等. 炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年·北京)[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2018, 38(9): 796-813. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK201809007.htm
    [11]
    颜廷梅. 2017中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病(学组)全国年会会议总结[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2017, 37(9): 825-825. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK201709010.htm
    [12]
    ALPER A, ZHANG L, PASHANKAR D S. Correlation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein with pediatric inflammatory bowel disease activity[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2017, 65(2): e25-e27. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001444
    [13]
    OLIVEIRA A M, CARDOSO F S, RODRIGUES C G, et al. Can red cell distribution width be used as a marker of Crohn's disease activity[J]. GE Port J Gastroenterol, 2016, 23(1): 6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.10.003
    [14]
    GOYAL H, LIPPI G, GJYMISHKAA, et al. Prognostic significance of red blood cell distribution width in gastrointestinal disorders[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(27): 4879-4891. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i27.4879
    [15]
    YEŞIL A, SENATEŞ E, BAYOGLUI V, et al. Red cell distribution width: a novel marker of activity in inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Gut Liver, 2011, 5(4): 460-467. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.4.460
    [16]
    张袁露, 庄思慧, 张诗颜. 血细胞相关参数在炎症性肠病患者中的变化及临床意义[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(6): 837-839. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.06.048
    [17]
    REINISCH W, PANACCIONE R, BOSSUYT P, et al. Association of biomarker cutoffs and endoscopic outcomes in Crohn's disease: apost hoc analysis from the CALM study[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2020, 26(10): 1562-1571. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa025
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(53)

    1. 张丽，张娜，刘新爱，王文娟，郝晶晶. 精神分裂症病人代谢综合征自我管理体验的质性研究. 全科护理. 2024(11): 2117-2121 .
    2. 马芳珍，许国军. 基于奥瑞姆自理理论的健康教育在急性脑梗死卧床患者中的应用. 中国基层医药. 2023(01): 133-137 .
    3. 樊建妮，兰燕，赵秀荣. 基于Orem自理理论的康复护理在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(08): 133-135 .
    4. 叶娟，卢菁，王晶晶. 基于Orem理论的护理干预对胸外科术后患者自护能力、负面情绪的作用. 国际护理学杂志. 2023(18): 3319-3323 .
    5. 胡东立. 基于Orem自理理论的康复护理对脑梗死恢复期患者认知功能及ADL能力的影响. 中国医学创新. 2022(04): 104-107 .
    6. 冯敏，于辉，张艳. 递进式护理在老年股骨颈骨折术后患者中的应用效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(10): 146-150 .
    7. 薛东霞，李瑾. 基于全科理念Barthel指数评定量表的康复护理在年龄>60岁脑梗死后偏瘫患者中的应用. 临床研究. 2022(01): 164-167 .
    8. 朱莹莹，兰曼丽. 基于Orem自理理论的康复训练联合奥塔戈运动对脑梗死偏瘫病人运动功能及治疗依从性的影响研究. 全科护理. 2022(32): 4465-4469 .
    9. 周晓霞. 奥瑞姆自理模式对急性缺血性脑卒中患者自我护理能力及神经功能的影响. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2022(21): 136-138 .
    10. 任春会，赵晓红. Orem自理模式在脑卒中患者护理效果及心理状态分析. 中外医疗. 2021(05): 151-153 .
    11. 林虹，杨美，王小帆. 基于Orem自理理论康复护理联合情志干预对脑梗死偏瘫患者神经功能、自护能力及生活质量的影响. 国际护理学杂志. 2021(05): 891-894 .
    12. 狄媛. 针刺联合康复训练治疗脑梗死后偏瘫对其脑血流动力学指标、神经缺损症状的影响. 现代养生. 2021(10): 40-43 .
    13. 康宾宾. rTMS联合早期康复训练对脑梗死后偏瘫患者上肢功能恢复的影响. 医学理论与实践. 2021(11): 1963-1964 .
    14. 张秀萍. Orem理论的分级延伸护理对髌骨粉碎性骨折的影响. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(08): 145-147 .
    15. 楚浓浓. 认知行为干预对脑梗后偏瘫患者肢体功能及生活质量的影响. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(11): 154-155 .
    16. 司秀荣. 阶段性语言训练在脑梗死运动性失语患者中的应用效果. 中国民康医学. 2021(12): 159-160 .
    17. 许淑华，李敏，唐小冬. 跨理论模型结合动机性访谈对偏瘫患者康复自我效能研究. 中国当代医药. 2021(25): 52-55 .
    18. 唐娟，崔金虹，尚芳芳，吴静，王璐. 强化社会、家庭支持对脑梗死伴抑郁患者心理及日常生活能力的影响. 国际精神病学杂志. 2020(01): 185-187 .
    19. 张红利. 奥塔戈运动结合早期康复对脑梗死偏瘫患者FMA评分、下肢肌力及MFES评分的影响. 广东医学. 2020(05): 491-495 .
    20. 李银侠，李培良，符小丽. 医护一体化护理对脑梗死患者自我效能及心理状态的影响. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2020(03): 348-349 .
    21. 程丽丹. 认知行为干预联合健康信念对脑梗死后偏瘫患者康复的影响. 黑龙江医药. 2020(04): 955-957 .
    22. 王秀英. 基于Orem自理理论的护理干预对放射性食管炎患者自理能力、并发症及生活质量的影响. 国际护理学杂志. 2020(12): 2255-2257 .
    23. 许乐. Orem自理理论指导下路径式护理在急性脑梗死患者早期康复护理中的应用. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2020(11): 1359-1361 .
    24. 吴小华. 以Orem自理理论为基础的康复护理对脑梗死偏瘫病人的干预效果研究. 全科护理. 2020(34): 4796-4798 .
    25. 陈萍，王娜. 基于Orem理论护理对冠状动脉硬化性心脏病患者生活质量的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2019(01): 150-151 .
    26. 黄国菊，崔岩，李军. Orem自理理论在妊娠合并乳腺癌患者护理中的应用效果. 保健医学研究与实践. 2019(01): 67-69 .
    27. 吴妍平，王立新，孟莉，王云文，徐仁华. 延续性护理干预对老年脑梗死患者生活质量的影响. 滨州医学院学报. 2019(01): 66-68 .
    28. 唐晶. 康复护理干预对脑梗死病人神经功能及日常生活能力的影响. 全科护理. 2019(08): 962-963 .
    29. 谢静. 奥塔戈运动训练联合萧氏双C护理模式在老年脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用效果研究. 中国全科医学. 2019(11): 1364-1368+1371 .
    30. 李言亭. Orem自理理论护理对脑梗死患者心理状态及生活自理能力的影响. 中国民康医学. 2019(06): 155-157 .
    31. 高燕美. 基于Orem理论为指导的延续性护理对老年帕金森病患者的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2019(09): 27-29 .
    32. 毛美芹. Orem自护理论运用于缺血性脑卒中患者中的效果观察. 基层医学论坛. 2019(21): 2978-2980 .
    33. 景俊. 奥塔戈运动联合奥瑞姆自理理论在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用. 中国民康医学. 2019(15): 167-169 .
    34. 吴艳，崔静怡，孙爱荣，马贵君. 精神分裂症患者自我管理体验的质性研究. 中华现代护理杂志. 2019(23): 2952-2956 .
    35. 张艳玲. 全程优质护理干预对脑梗死偏瘫患者ADL评分的影响. 河南医学研究. 2019(20): 3836-3838 .
    36. 杨记意，刘君武. 基于Orem自理理论的护理干预对慢性胃炎患者自护能力及生活质量的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2019(19): 39-41 .
    37. 邹艳辉，段红梅，陈芳，董晓燕. Orem自理理论的康复护理指导对脑梗死偏瘫患者日常自理能力和焦虑情绪的影响. 中外医学研究. 2019(30): 115-117 .
    38. 杨伟宁，陈俊平. Orem自理康复护理模式在脑梗死偏瘫恢复期患者中的应用效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2019(31): 148-150 .
    39. 李亚利，王胜利. 森田疗法配合Orem自我护理干预对急性创伤骨折后抑郁患者预后的影响. 实用临床医药杂志. 2019(17): 123-126 . 本站查看
    40. 史优波，张微微，李宁宁，曹建平，何松彬. 太极“云手”运动结合Orem自理护理对脑卒中康复患者ADL的影响. 中国现代医生. 2019(29): 150-154 .
    41. 谢桂兰，杨慧娟，邹琴娓，陈菁，王晓梅. 优质护理服务在老年性脑梗死患者中的应用效果. 中国当代医药. 2019(33): 219-222 .
    42. 李芳. Orem自理模式护理对脑梗塞患者的护理效果探讨. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(A2): 384-385 .
    43. 梁艳芳. Orem自理理论对胃溃疡患者自护能力及心理状态的影响. 中国医药导报. 2018(10): 174-176+181 .
    44. 梁宇. Orem自理护理模式对老年脑梗死患者认知功能及康复效果的影响. 中国医药指南. 2018(09): 231 .
    45. 王香花. 早期功能训练对脑梗死偏瘫失语患者语言功能与运动功能的影响. 实用中医药杂志. 2018(06): 719-720 .
    46. 王健. 奥伦自理模式对脑梗死患者康复锻炼的评价. 甘肃科技. 2018(16): 109-110 .
    47. 林瑞珍. 早期康复护理模式应用于脑梗死患者的效果. 中国医药科学. 2018(18): 100-102 .
    48. 曾凡林. Barthel指数分级指导下的Orem自理模式在脑卒中偏瘫患者中的应用. 护理实践与研究. 2018(18): 34-35 .
    49. 邱敏玲，陈婷婷，许安有. 康复训练联合自理理论对脑卒中患者恢复效果观察. 中国卫生标准管理. 2018(23): 180-182 .
    50. 张晓阳. 量化评估联合奥瑞姆理论在脑梗死后偏瘫患者中的应用. 河南医学研究. 2018(23): 4408-4409 .
    51. 李海丽，张晓燕，王健. Orem自理理论应用于老年脑梗死患者的效果及对生活能力和认知功能的影响. 中医药临床杂志. 2018(09): 1748-1750 .
    52. 鲁佳珏. 基于Orem理论的日间照料护理在慢性精神分裂症患者康复中的应用效果. 现代中西医结合杂志. 2017(33): 3752-3755 .
    53. 段焱. 综合护理应用于脑梗死运动性失语患者中的疗效观察. 中国现代药物应用. 2017(24): 151-152 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (237) PDF downloads (25) Cited by(56)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return