| Citation: |
HAO Xiaoqiang, XIA Qiang, DUN Wenchao. Holmium laser lithotripsy by flexible ureteroscope versus rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with basket extraction of ureteral stone in treating upper ureteral calculus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(2): 105-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221649
|
To compare the efficacy and safety between holmium laser lithotripsy by flexible ureteroscope and rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with basket extraction of ureteral stone in treating upper ureteral calculus.
The clinical materials of 145 patients with single upper ureteral calculus treated by transurethral ureteroscope were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 74 patients with rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy and basket extraction of ureteral stone were named as control group, and 71 patients treated by holmium laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscope after purchasing electronic ureteroscope were named as observation group. The operation time, success rate of lithotripsy, escape rate of calculus, ureteral injury, residual stone rate at 2 weeks after operation, intraoperative bleeding and infection rate were compared between the two groups.
In the control group, 10 cases failed to intercept due to the upward movement of calculus, which required indwelling ureteral stents combined with extracorporeal lithotripsy and drug lithotripsy; holmium laser lithotripsy was successfully performed in the Ⅱ stage in the observation group after the ureteral stent was placed for expansion in the Ⅰ stage. The escape rate of calculus, success rate of lithotripsy and the average operation time in the observation group were significantly higher and longer than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, ureteral injury rate and postoperative infection rate between the two groups (P>0.05).
In the treatment of upper ureteral calculus with holmium laser, the efficacy of flexible ureteroscope is better than that of rigid ureteroscope combined with basket extraction of ureteral stone, but the safety of the two operation methods is equivalent.
| [1] |
李鑫, 宋波, 孔广起. 组合式输尿管软镜联合钬激光治疗肾及输尿管上段结石97例报告[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(7): 621-623. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK201607014.htm
|
| [2] |
YOU J H, KIM Y G, KIM M K. Should we place ureteral stents in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: consideration of surgical techniques and complications[J]. Korean J Urol, 2014, 55(8): 511-514. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.8.511
|
| [3] |
于澄钒, 张弋, 李宁忱. 输尿管镜下同期治疗双侧上尿路结石的有效性和安全性[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 37(5): 358-362. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2016.05.010
|
| [4] |
JENDEBERG J, GEIJER H, ALSHAMARI M, et al. Size matters: the width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(11): 4775-4785. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6
|
| [5] |
SHARMA G, SHARMA A. Clinical implications and applications of the twinkling sign in ureteral Calculus: a preliminary study[J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(6): 2132-2135. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.176
|
| [6] |
黄占洪, 李文科, 刘跃光, 等. 拦截网篮和无封堵装置在治疗输尿管上段结石手术中的对比分析[J]. 中国综合临床, 2016, 32(11): 993-996.
|
| [7] |
屈维龙, 汪益民, 尤志新. N-Trap拦截网篮或封堵器和无封堵装置应用于输尿管上段结石手术的效果比较[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2018, 38(5): 708-711.
|
| [8] |
孟庆利, 江彬, 王学斌, 等. PCNL FURL术单用及螺旋状套石篮辅助FURL治疗单侧直径大于1.0 cm输尿管上段结石的效果对比[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(9): 1561-1565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HCYX202009036.htm
|
| [9] |
尹冰德, 巫嘉文. 输尿管硬镜联合不同种类封堵器原位钬激光碎石治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2019, 39(3): 412-415. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2019.03.008
|
| [10] |
郭青良, 周树明. F6/7.5输尿管镜钬激光治疗禁忌体外碎石的输尿管上段结石的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2021, 48(5): 76-78.
|
| [11] |
罗星. 输尿管软镜碎石治疗老年上尿路结石患者发生结石逃逸的危险因素分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 207-212,C5.
|
| [12] |
杨景明, 曹炀. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术联合COOK三丝套石篮用于输尿管上段结石疗效观察[J]. 山东医药, 2018, 58(9): 84-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201809028.htm
|
| [13] |
侯立男, 何士尧. 管路封堵器及顺行冲洗辅助输尿管镜治疗上段输尿管结石的应用研究[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2017, 37(2): 182-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL202012044.htm
|
| 1. |
沈良伟，李涛，金祝华，黄刚. CT定位辅助神经内镜手术对脑包虫病的疗效分析. 临床神经病学杂志. 2023(01): 39-43 .
| |
| 2. |
廖佳奇，许金仙，叶新运，温小华. 桥小脑角肿瘤微创切除术中应用神经内镜对其功能恢复及预后的影响. 广州医药. 2023(05): 61-64+69 .
| |
| 3. |
宋少谦. 神经内镜辅助显微手术治疗囊性脑肿瘤的疗效观察. 临床研究. 2022(11): 8-11 .
| |
| 4. |
蔡昌呈，陈星宇，向城卫，刘应刚，李维民，罗可. 神经内镜联合颅底显微神经外科手术对脑肿瘤患者的影响. 内蒙古医科大学学报. 2022(06): 634-636+640 .
| |
| 5. |
侯晓峰，张春阳. 探讨神经内镜辅助显微手术应用于囊性脑肿瘤患者治疗的临床效果. 影像研究与医学应用. 2020(13): 219-220 .
| |
| 6. |
杨文凯. 神经内镜辅助显微手术治疗囊性脑肿瘤的疗效观察. 航空航天医学杂志. 2020(11): 1342-1343 .
|
© 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部
Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
DownLoad: