ZHU Ting, ZHOU Hailan, HUA Xiaofan. Establishment and application of Nomogram model for prediction of recurrence after breast cancer surgery based on multi-dimensional indicators[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 43-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221838
Citation: ZHU Ting, ZHOU Hailan, HUA Xiaofan. Establishment and application of Nomogram model for prediction of recurrence after breast cancer surgery based on multi-dimensional indicators[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 43-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221838

Establishment and application of Nomogram model for prediction of recurrence after breast cancer surgery based on multi-dimensional indicators

More Information
  • Received Date: June 11, 2022
  • Revised Date: December 22, 2022
  • Available Online: April 06, 2023
  • Objective 

    To establish a Nomogram model for prediction of recurrence after breast cancer surgery based on multi-dimensional indicators.

    Methods 

    A total of 313 female patients with surgical treatment for unilateral breast cancer from March 2014 to April 2020 in authors' hospital were retrospectively selected as research objects, and they were divided into modeling set with 219 cases and validation set with 94 cases by the random number table method at a ratio of 7 to 3. In the modeling set, the patients were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group according to recurrence condition during follow-up after operation. Single factor and multi-factor Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative recurrence of breast cancer. Based on the screening results, the R software was used to draw the Nomogram prediction model. The performance of the model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and deviation test of goodness of fit. The calibration map was verified and drawn by computer-simulated repeated sampling method (Bootstrap); the decision curve was used to evaluate the clinical benefit rate of the model.

    Results 

    Among the 219 case in the modeling set, 63 cases (28.77%) had recurrence of breast cancer after surgery. Irregular tumor margin (OR=1.692, 95%CI, 1.154 to 3.794), high maximum elastic modulus of tissues around 3 mm from focus measured by Shell function and tracing method (Shell3 Emax) (OR=2.869, 95%CI, 1.795 to 5.392), lymph node metastasis (OR=2.071, 95%CI, 1.486 to 4.578), high expression of D-dimer (OR=2.264, 95%CI, 1.574 to 5.307) and high ratio of fibrinogen to albumin (OR=3.089, 95%CI, 2.053 to 6.156) were risk factors for postoperative recurrence of patients with breast cancer (P < 0.05). Nomogram model for risk prediction was established based on the five factors mentioned above, the area under the curve of the ROC curve of the model was 0.872 (95%CI, 0.829 to 0.917), the best cut-off value (threshold probability) was 0.32 (32%), and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 0.871 and 0.837 respectively; the test of goodness of fit showed that there was no over-fitting phenomenon in the prediction model (χ2=4.204, P=0.826); the Bootstrap method based on 1 000 sampling verifications found that the average absolute error of the calibration curve was 0.019, indicating that the prediction model had a good consistency. The area under the curve of the ROC curve of the Nomogram model for prediction of validation set was 0.864, the sensitivity was 0.862, and the specificity was 0.815; the correction curve was close to the ideal curve. When the threshold probability value in the decision curve was set to 32%, the clinical benefit rates of the population in the modeling set and the validation set were 56% and 62% respectively.

    Conclusion 

    Nomogram model based on tumor margin, Shell3 Emax value, condition of lymph node metastasis, serum D-dimer and the ratio of fibrinogen to albumin of breast cancer patients has a certain value in predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence.

  • [1]
    ROMÁN M, LOURO J, POSSO M, et al. Breast density, benign breast disease, and risk of breast cancer over time[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(7): 4839-4847. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07490-5
    [2]
    中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGAZ202110015.htm
    [3]
    ABDULWASSI H K, AMER I T, ALHIBSHI A H, et al. Recurrence rates and long-term survival factors in young women with breast cancer[J]. Saudi Med J, 2020, 41(4): 393-399. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.4.24987
    [4]
    张勇, 余一朗, 单鹏飞, 等. 乳腺癌患者改良根治术后复发转移的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2021, 15(4): 418-421. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHPW202104018.htm
    [5]
    商晓莎, 倪婷, 王文涛, 等. 肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后早期复发的影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(3): 168-170. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10459-1019119627.htm
    [6]
    杨韵贤, 李世梅, 姚继祎, 等. 乳腺癌肿物的超声特点与术后复发的Logistic回归分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 509-512. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCY202105011.htm
    [7]
    BIONDIC ŠPOLJAR I, IVANAC G, RADOVIC N, et al. Potential role of shear wave elastography features in medullary breast cancer differentiation[J]. Med Hypotheses, 2020, 144: 110021. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110021
    [8]
    陈艳, 彭国平, 闵洁, 等. 剪切波弹性成像定量参数对良恶性乳腺肿块的鉴别及对乳腺癌术后复发的预测价值[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(1): 24-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKGH202101005.htm
    [9]
    FORTE A J, HUAYLLANI M T, BOCZAR D, et al. The basics of ultrasound elastography for diagnosis, assessment, and staging breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Gland Surg, 2020, 9(2): 589-595. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.02.08
    [10]
    ZHAO N, ROSEN J M. Breast cancer heterogeneity through the lens of single-cell analysis and spatial pathologies[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2022, 82: 3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.010
    [11]
    吴歆, 梁博. 基于超声和癌症指标构建乳腺癌术后生存列线图[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(23): 62-68. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213928
    [12]
    姜巧丽, 樊浩然, 赵东亮. 血浆D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原对结直肠癌患者手术后生存状况的预测效果[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2020, 42(2): 147-150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCSZ202002009.htm
    [13]
    李佳乐, 刘旭. D-二聚体在肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2017, 38(18): 2588-2590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWSQ201718032.htm
    [14]
    崔金芳, 韩雪娇, 徐晓敏, 等. D-二聚体与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志: 电子版, 2019, 13(2): 111-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHRD201902011.htm
    [15]
    WINTHER-LARSEN A, SANDFELD-PAULSEN B, HVAS A M. Hyperfibrinolysis in patients with solid malignant neoplasms: a systematic review[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2021, 47(5): 581-588.
    [16]
    HWANG K T, CHUNG J K, ROH E Y, et al. Prognostic influence of preoperative fibrinogen to albumin ratio for breast cancer[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2017, 20(3): 254-263.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 张红娜. 血液透析滤过联合小剂量骨化三醇对肾性骨病患者血清骨源性碱性磷酸酶、甲状旁腺素水平及钙磷代谢的影响. 临床合理用药杂志. 2021(09): 24-26 .
    2. 王艺艳. 维持性血液透析患者发生相对性甲状旁腺功能减退的危险因素分析. 中外医学研究. 2020(12): 9-11 .
    3. 刘文思,刘中柱,刘艳姝. 低钙透析液对老年血液透析伴低转化肾性骨病患者的影响. 黑龙江医药科学. 2020(02): 55-56+58 .
    4. 易黎黎. 低钙透析液对老年血液透析伴低转化肾性骨病患者的影响. 海峡药学. 2020(06): 141-143 .
    5. 陈昕,何堤,鲁乃宏,邓莹. 血液透析与腹膜透析对慢性肾病患者血清甲状旁腺激素、骨转运生化相关指标及维生素D水平的影响. 临床误诊误治. 2020(09): 77-81 .
    6. 甄颖,刘山. 不同钙浓度透析液对血透患者肾性骨病疗效观察. 哈尔滨医药. 2020(04): 337-338 .
    7. 廖琳,路建饶,陈杰,陈晛,胡静,张传富,韩海燕,郭玥. 不同钙浓度透析液在老年MHD伴动力缺失性肾性骨病患者治疗中的效果差异. 标记免疫分析与临床. 2020(09): 1487-1490+1541 .
    8. 张灵灵. 血液透析联合血液灌流治疗老年血液透析合并慢性肾脏病矿物质和骨代谢异常的效果及对BMP、iPTH、甲状腺素水平的影响. 中国老年学杂志. 2018(09): 2168-2170 .
    9. 李金成,廖新媛,陈莉,苏富昌,欧肇秋. 不同钙浓度透析液对血透患者肾性骨病疗效观察. 中医临床研究. 2018(33): 115-116 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (200) PDF downloads (16) Cited by(9)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return