Clinical safety and effectiveness of upper rectal artery embolization in patients with internal hemorrhoids

LU Jinghua; LIU Qixue; WU Chunyan; SU Yuguang

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20223653

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2023 > 27(9): 119-122. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20223653

LU Jinghua, LIU Qixue, WU Chunyan, SU Yuguang. Clinical safety and effectiveness of upper rectal artery embolization in patients with internal hemorrhoids[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(9): 119-122. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20223653

Citation:

PDF (752 KB)

Clinical safety and effectiveness of upper rectal artery embolization in patients with internal hemorrhoids

1.
Department of Proctology, Qinhuangdao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000
2.
Department of Intervention, Qinhuangdao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000

More Information

Received Date: December 06, 2022
Revised Date: February 09, 2023
Available Online: May 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To investigate the clinical safety and effectiveness of upper rectal artery embolization in the treatment of grade Ⅱ to Ⅳ internal hemorrhoids.
Methods
A total of 72 patients diagnosed with grade Ⅱ to Ⅳ internal hemorrhoids were selected as study objects. A random number table method was used to divide these patients into postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) group and embolization group, with 36 cases in each group. Embolization group was treated with upper rectal artery embolization, and PPH group was treated with PPH operation. Perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, clinical efficacy and postoperative anal symptoms were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence of internal hemorrhoids was observed.
Results
The total effective rate of embolization group was higher than that of the PPH group (P < 0.05). The operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and wound healing time of the embolization group showed statistically significant differences compared with those of the PPH group (P < 0.05). The score of postoperative symptoms and the total incidence of complications in the embolization group were lower than those in the PPH group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curve combined with Log-rank test showed no statistical significance difference in recurrence 9 months after surgery was seen between the two groups (P=0.09).
Conclusion
The upper rectal artery embolization has a good effect in the treatment of Ⅱ to Ⅳ degree of hemorrhoids mainly manifesting as bleeding, and has positive significance in improving the clinical efficiency, promoting the rapid recovery and improving the clinical adverse symptoms.
- internal hemorrhoids,
- superior rectal artery interventional embolization,
- clinical efficacy,
- security,
- complications,
- adverse reaction

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	PARK S, KIM Y, SHIN J H, et al. Outcome of rectal arterial embolization for rectal bleeding in 34 patients: a single-center retrospective study over 20 years[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2020, 31(4): 576-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.05.013
[2]	HAN X, XIA F, CHEN G, et al. Superior rectal artery embolization for bleeding internal hemorrhoids[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2021, 25(1): 75-80. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02312-8
[3]	罗春生, 茅爱武, 贾一平, 等. 直肠上动脉介入栓塞术治疗Ⅱ~Ⅳ度内痔的可行性及安全性分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2018, 24(2): 108-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCGM201802004.htm
[4]	TRADI F, MEGE D E, LOUIS G, et al. Emborrhoïd: traitement des hémorroïdes par embolisation des artères rectales[J]. La Presse Médicale, 2019, 48(4): 454-459. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.04.011
[5]	连银城, 刘先秒, 刘佳, 等. 内痔硬化剂注射与吻合器痔切除术治疗内痔的临床效果比较[J]. 海南医学, 2019, 30(17): 2230-2232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2019.17.017
[6]	叶婷, 张管平, 夏虎平. 胶圈套扎与痣动脉结扎用于Ⅱ~Ⅲ度内痔的疗效及远期复发风险比较[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(2): 72-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2021.02.018
[7]	李婷, 朱林存, 刘晓峰. 2020欧洲肛肠病学学会《痔病诊疗指南》简介与解读[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志: 电子版, 2022, 12(4): 193-197. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYE202204001.htm
[8]	SHOJI S, HANADA I, OTAKI T, et al. Functional outcomes of transurethral thulium laser enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia over a period of 12 months: a prospective randomized study[J]. Int J Urol, 2020, 27(11): 974-980. doi: 10.1111/iju.14341
[9]	CULL C A, REZAC D J, DEDONDER K D, et al. Behavioral and performance response associated with administration of intravenous flunixin meglumine or oral meloxicam immediately prior to surgical castration in bull calves[J]. J Anim Sci, 2022, 100(5): 49.
[10]	刘俊. 消化内镜下内痔的微创治疗策略和优势[J]. 中华医学信息导报, 2022, 37(11): 14-14.
[11]	谢刚, 苏其玲, 罗美清, 等. 自动弹力线痔疮套扎术辅以黏膜下注射对轻中度混合痔的临床疗效[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2018, 38(10): 2129-2133. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.10.012
[12]	唐凡, 陈鹏飞, 李方正, 等. 恶性肿瘤致口腔出血的急诊血管内栓塞介入治疗价值初探[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2021, 56(4): 370-373.
[13]	张红涛. 痔疮自动套扎术联合地奥司明对混合性痔疮的治疗效果及对炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2018, 20(6): 510-512. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFJB201806019.htm
[14]	石永波. 针药联合自动痔疮套扎术治疗重度混合痔[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2018, 24(5): 622-624. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZX201805022.htm
[15]	谢刚, 苏其玲, 罗美清, 等. 自动弹力线痔疮套扎术辅以黏膜下注射对轻中度混合痔的临床疗效[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2018, 38(10): 2129-2133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB201810012.htm
[16]	刘启学, 卢精华, 吴春艳, 等. 血管栓塞与内镜联合聚桂醇治疗内痔出血的疗效比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(2): 104-107. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20212857
[17]	荆剑, 白旭明, 顾星石, 等. 超选择动脉栓塞治疗内痔11例临床效果[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(8): 732-734. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRFS201808007.htm
[18]	罗春生, 贾一平, 茅爱武, 等. 经血管超选择直肠上动脉栓塞治疗痔病的初步临床分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(25): 1960-1963.
[19]	马凰富, 李佳楠, 李昕, 等. 胶圈套扎术和注射疗法治疗痔病的临床研究现状与思考[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2020, 26(3): 280-283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCGM202003013.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (152) PDF downloads (11)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Clinical safety and effectiveness of upper rectal artery embolization in patients with internal hemorrhoids

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content