ZHANG Xuting, LUO Caifeng, WU Xianqun, SHANG Bin, WEI Lanzhi, LYU Fei. Visual analysis of shared decision researches in patients with breast cancer based on core set of Web of Science[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 37-42. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230022
Citation: ZHANG Xuting, LUO Caifeng, WU Xianqun, SHANG Bin, WEI Lanzhi, LYU Fei. Visual analysis of shared decision researches in patients with breast cancer based on core set of Web of Science[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 37-42. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230022

Visual analysis of shared decision researches in patients with breast cancer based on core set of Web of Science

More Information
  • Received Date: January 03, 2023
  • Revised Date: January 27, 2023
  • Available Online: April 06, 2023
  • Objective 

    To analyze the research status, hotspots and frontiers of shared decision making in patients with breast cancer based on visualization software.

    Methods 

    The literatures in the field of shared decision making for patients with breast cancer from the establishment to January 2023 in core set database of Web of Science were retrieved, and the metrology analysis was performed by CiteSpace 5.7. R1 software.

    Results 

    A total of 1 283 literatures were retrieved, and 759 literatures were finally included for visual analysis. The number of published literatures showed a fluctuating upward trend; the United States had laid the foundation for this research field; the Europe, the United States and other developed countries and their institutions had close cooperation; the research hotspots focused on aspects of different female groups, patients' needs, different decision making stages and the development of intervention techniques in breast cancer patients with sharing decision making.

    Conclusion 

    In recent years, the sharing decision making of breast cancer patients has received continuous attention, and more researches has been done in developed countries. It is suggested that Chinese clinical researchers should broaden their cooperation fields, focus on relevant research hotspots, and promote the development of shared decision making researches on breast cancer patients in China.

  • [1]
    SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
    [2]
    中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会(CBCS), 中国医师协会外科医师分会乳腺外科医师专委会(CSBS), 吴炅, 等. 乳腺肿瘤整形与乳房重建专家共识(2018年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(6): 439-480. doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.06.008
    [3]
    高雅靖, 单岩, 周越, 等. 医患共享决策沟通的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(1): 156-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.01.033
    [4]
    曹磊, 曲兆伟. 共享决策干预对肝癌患者治疗决策满意度及希望水平的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(18): 32-35. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.18.032
    [5]
    杨林宁, 杨艳, 胡嘉乐, 等. 决策辅助工具用于乳腺癌患者的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 110-113. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.02.110
    [6]
    安培, 王慧, 吴克瑾, 等. 年轻女性早期乳腺癌患者生育力保存决策的内心体验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(3): 354-358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.03.007
    [7]
    MATSEN C B, LYONS S, GOODMAN M S, et al. Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2019, 102(1): 155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.004
    [8]
    KARUTURI M S, GIORDANO S H, HOOVER D S, et al. Exploring and supporting older women's chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer[J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2022, 13(2): 170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.018
    [9]
    LAWHON V M, ENGLAND R E, WALLACE A S, et al. "It's important to me": a qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer[J]. Psychooncology, 2021, 30(2): 167-175. doi: 10.1002/pon.5545
    [10]
    缪爱云, 吴奇云, 李丽, 等. 原发性肝癌患者参与治疗决策现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2015, 22(7): 5-9. doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2015.07.005
    [11]
    雎琪玉. 乳腺癌患者参与治疗决策和决策后悔的现状及其影响因素研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021.
    [12]
    MAHMOODI N, SARGEANT S. Shared decision-making-Rhetoric and reality: women's experiences and perceptions of adjuvant treatment decision-making for breast cancer[J]. J Health Psychol, 2019, 24(8): 1082-1092. doi: 10.1177/1359105316689141
    [13]
    钱雅芬, 章小飞, 金艾香, 等. 共享决策模式对乳腺癌患者化疗完整率及决策参与满意度的影响[J]. 护理与康复, 2020, 19(4): 54-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2020.04.013
    [14]
    BURTON M, KILNER K, WYLD L, et al. Information needs and decision-making preferences of older women offered a choice between surgery and primary endocrine therapy for early breast cancer[J]. Psychooncology, 2017, 26(12): 2094-2100. doi: 10.1002/pon.4429
    [15]
    DUBENSKE L L, SCHRAGER S, MCDOWELL H, et al. Mammography screening: gaps in patient's and physician's needs for shared decision-making[J]. Breast J, 2017, 23(2): 210-214. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12779
    [16]
    GUNN C M, MASCHKE A, PAASCHE-ORLOW M K, et al. Engaging women with limited health literacy in mammography decision-making: perspectives of patients and primary care providers[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2021, 36(4): 938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2
    [17]
    CLARKE M, COLLINS R, DARBY S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9503): 2087-2106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7
    [18]
    MONTAGNA G, MORROW M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer: what to discuss with patients[J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2020, 20(3): 159-166. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1732213
    [19]
    LAMORE K, FLAHAULT C, FASSE L, et al. "Waiting for breast reconstruction": an interpretative phenomenological analysis of heterosexual couples' experiences of mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2019, 42: 42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.07.008
    [20]
    刘清媛, 叶红芳, 戴薇. 决策辅助工具在乳房重建患者中应用效果的系统评价[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2022, 39(5): 51-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL202205013.htm
    [21]
    管佳琴, 曹阿勇, 余科达, 等. 乳腺癌术后乳房重建患者决策辅助工具的构建及效果评价[J]. 复旦学报: 医学版, 2021, 48(6): 762-771. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2021.06.007
    [22]
    WIENER R S, KOPPELMAN E, BOLTON R, et al. Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision-making in early adopting lung cancer screening programs: a qualitative study[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2018, 33(7): 1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4350-9
    [23]
    BERGER-HÖGER B, LIETHMANN K, MVHLHAUSER I, et al. Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers: a cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 93: 141-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.013
    [24]
    郭理想. 基于知信行理论的肿瘤科护士共享决策问卷的研制与初步应用[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021.
    [25]
    MAES-CARBALLO M, MORENO-ASENCIO T, MARTÍN-DÍAZ M, et al. Shared decision making in breast cancer screening guidelines: a systematic review of their quality and reporting[J]. Eur J Public Health, 2021, 31(4): 873-883. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab084
    [26]
    HULL O, NIRANJAN S J, WALLACE A S, et al. Should we be talking about guidelines with patients A qualitative analysis in metastatic breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2020, 184(1): 115-121. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05832-x
    [27]
    YANG S, YU L, ZHANG C M, et al. Effects of decision aids on breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023, 32(7/8): 1025-1044.
    [28]
    牟玮, 陆翠, 王云云, 等. 患者决策辅助工具国际标准4.0版的引进与评估[J]. 医学与哲学, 2019, 40(18): 11-17. doi: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2019.18.03
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 陈瑞,陈涛,邵俊,叶敬霆,朱继高,唐程斌. 急性A型主动脉夹层合并下肢缺血的处理策略. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(16): 63-67 . 本站查看
    2. 宋艳艳,刘利,李明亮,曲成良,姜博. 体重指数对Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后并发症的影响. 宁夏医学杂志. 2022(01): 35-37 .
    3. 宋艳艳,马富珍,李艳婷. 64例Stanford A型主动脉夹层孙氏术后围术期处理. 宁夏医科大学学报. 2020(03): 313-316 .
    4. 陈国锋,牛冬梅,王国锋,杨学超,王青青,汪高磊. 内膜片旷置法主动脉根部成形在Standford A型夹层中的应用. 中国循证心血管医学杂志. 2019(06): 733-735 .
    5. 林曦,谢强丽,陈蓓蓓,曹艳君,刘庆华,金枝. 心脏主动脉夹层术后医院感染相关因素分析及预防对策研究. 中华医院感染学杂志. 2018(13): 1975-1978 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (197) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return