Citation: | LIU Hanqin, PENG Rui, WANG Maohua, ZHANG Jianyou, GUO Miao, ZHU Yue, CHEN Maogui. Application effect of remimazolam combined with fentanyl in painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(11): 133-136. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230082 |
To investigate the effectiveness and optimal dose of remimazolam combined with fentanyl in painless gastroscopy.
A total of 200 patients who planned to undergo painless gastroscopy were selected as study objects. They were randomly divided into R1 group (0.05 mg fentanyl combined with remimazolam 0.20 mg/kg group), R2 group (0.05 mg fentanyl combined with remimazolam 0.30 mg/kg group), R3 group (0.05 mg fentanyl combined with remimazolam 0.40 mg/kg group) and C group (0.05 mg fentanyl combined with propofol 2.00 mg/kg, control group), with 50 cases in each group. General data of the four groups were compared; heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), success rate of sedation, time to gastroscopy, time to recovery, time to leave hospital and incidence of adverse reactions were compared before examination (T0), at admission (T1), 2 min after admission (T2) and 4 min after admission (T3).
There was no statistical significance in the general data of the four groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the group C, the success rate of sedation in the R1 group was significantly decreased, the time of examination was significantly prolonged, the time of recovery was significantly shortened, and the incidence of body movement and cough was significantly increased (P < 0.05); the incidence rates of hypotension, hypoxemia and injection pain in the R1, R2 and R3 groups were significantly decreased, while the incidence of hiccup in the R3 group was significantly increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the R1 group, the success rates of sedation in the R2 and R3 groups were significantly increased, and the incidence of body movement and cough was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with the R3 group, the time to wake up and time to leave hospital in the R2 group were significantly shortened (P < 0.05). Compared with group C, HR and MAP in R1, R2 and R3 groups were significantly increased at T1 (P < 0.05); compared with the R1 group, HR and MAP in the R2 and R3 groups at T1 were significantly decreased (P < 0.05); the MAP and HR at T1 in the R1 group were significantly higher than those at other time points; the MAP of the C group at T1 was significantly lower than that at other time points (P < 0.05). Conclusion 0.30 mg/kg remazolam combined with 0.05 mg fentanyl has high success rate of sedation, little influence on circulation and respiratory system, low incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions, and the best effect.
[1] |
YIN N, XIA J Y, CAO Y Z, et al. Effect of propofol combined with opioids on cough reflex suppression in gastroscopy: study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(9): e014881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014881
|
[2] |
HAO L N, HU X B, ZHU B Q, et al. Clinical observation of the combined use of propofol and etomidate in painless gastroscopy[J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(45): e23061. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023061
|
[3] |
LI D N, ZHAO G Q, SU Z B. Propofol target-controlled infusion in anesthesia induction during painless gastroscopy[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2019, 29(7): 604-607. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.07.604
|
[4] |
POROSTOCKY P, CHIBA N, COLACINO P, et al. A survey of sedation practices for colonoscopy in Canada[J]. Can J Gastroenterol, 2011, 25(5): 255-260. doi: 10.1155/2011/783706
|
[5] |
SNEYD J R, RIGBY-JONES A E. Remimazolam for anaesthesia or sedation[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2020, 33(4): 506-511. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000877
|
[6] |
DOIM, MORITA K, TAKEDA J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase Ⅱb/Ⅲ trial[J]. J Anesth, 2020, 34(4): 543-553. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02788-6
|
[7] |
WANG J, HUANG J, YANG S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of esketamine in Chinese patients undergoing painless gastroscopy in comparison with ketamine: a randomized, open-label clinical study[J]. Drug Des Dev Ther, 2019, 13: 4135-4144. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S224553
|
[8] |
ANTONIK L J, GOLDWATER D R, KILPATRICK G J, et al. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase Ⅰ single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056)[J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115(2): 274-283. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823f0c28
|
[9] |
王倩, 王茂华, 杨天爽, 等. 不同剂量瑞马唑仑复合丙泊酚应用于无痛胃镜检查的效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(2): 163-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ202202011.htm
|
[10] |
SAARI T I, UUSI-OUKARI M, AHONEN J, et al. Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology[J]. Pharmacol Rev, 2011, 63(1): 243-267. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.002717
|
[11] |
杨天爽, 王茂华, 王倩, 等. 单纯应用瑞马唑仑在无痛胃镜检查中的可行性探讨[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(21): 127-130,135. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20221410
|
[12] |
SCHVTTLER J, EISENRIED A, LERCH M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056) after continuous infusion in healthy male volunteers[J]. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(4): 636-651. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003103
|