| Citation: |
LIU Yan, HU Liping, LIU Kewei, GUO Xianbin, CAI Junxiu, PAN Min, TANG Jie, GONG Qingtao, LI Zhiguo, WANG Li. Effect of pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(22): 110-113. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232268
|
To observe the effect of pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model in the treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction.
A total of 67 patients with acute cerebral infarction were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into observation group (n=37) and control group (n=30) according to the therapeutic model. The control group was conducted with the traditional therapeutic model, while the observation group was conducted with the pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model. The time efficiency of intravenous thrombolysis, early recovery of nerve function and oxidative stress indexes were compared between the two groups.
There was no significant difference in the time from onset to visit between the two groups (P > 0.05); the time from seeing a doctor to thrombolysis and the time from seeing a doctor to signing the informed consent for intravenous thrombolysis in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). On the hospital admission, there was no significant difference in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score between the two groups (P > 0.05); at the time points of 7 days after admission and 90 days after thrombolysis, the NIHSS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of serum glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and malonaldehyde (MDA) between the two groups (P > 0.05); the level of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). One patient died in the control group, with a mortality rate of 3.33%; no patient died in the observation group.
Pre-hospital and intra-hospital collaborative therapeutic model can effectively improve the time efficiency of intravenous thrombolysis for patients with acute cerebral infarction, alleviate the neurological damage, and reduce degree of oxidative stress reaction and death risk.
| [1] |
CHEN L L, WANG W T, ZHANG S, et al. Cohort study on the prognosis of acute cerebral infarction in different circulatory systems at 1-year follow-up[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1): 521. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02291-0
|
| [2] |
黄颖, 胡存昆. 血清ANGPTL4、VE-cadherin水平与急性脑梗死患者颈动脉易损斑块的关系[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2022, 50(5): 762-764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYYY202205035.htm
|
| [3] |
庞刚, 梁有明, 秦国文, 等. 亚低温治疗对急性外伤性脑梗死患者炎性因子水平及神经功能的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(7): 854-857, 865. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NOTH202107009.htm
|
| [4] |
EDWARDS M D, HUGHES T A T. Managing blood pressure in acute cerebral infarction[J]. J Neurol, 2021, 268(6): 2294-2296. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10622-6
|
| [5] |
WU H L, GONG W P, TANG Y Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2021, 2021: 2833043.
|
| [6] |
BEHME D, GERA R G, TSOGKAS I, et al. Impact of time on thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score results[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2020, 30(2): 345-353. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00786-0
|
| [7] |
江帆, 叶丽萍, 孙克玉, 等. 院前院内协同救治平台在急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓中的应用[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022, 37(18): 1682-1684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202218011.htm
|
| [8] |
张梅英, 王冰, 周如女, 等. 院前-院内一体化智能急诊分诊信息系统在批量伤员救治中的应用效果[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(11): 51-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL202011014.htm
|
| [9] |
陈杰, 魏强, 殷伟东, 等. 区域院前院内急救信息一体化共享平台的建设与应用[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2020, 41(7): 26-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNWS202007006.htm
|
| [10] |
顾淑芳, 孙娜. 院前急救与院内救治衔接的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017, 52(4): 474-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL201704030.htm
|
| [11] |
中国中西医结合学会神经科专业委员会. 中国脑梗死中西医结合诊治指南(2017)[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2018, 38(2): 136-144. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZXJ201802003.htm
|
| [12] |
GU S Q, GAO X M, GU W, et al. Effect of new nursing on patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022, 2022: 1863129.
|
| [13] |
NI T T, FU Y, ZHOU W, et al. Carotid plaques and neurological impairment in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1): e0226961.
|
| [14] |
GUO Y J, YANG Y Q, ZHOU M K, 等. 中国脑梗死患者静脉溶栓后出血转化危险因素的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(11): 1202-1204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZUZH201811017.htm
|
| [15] |
CHARBONNIER G, BONNET L, BOUAMRA B, et al. Does intravenous thrombolysis influence the time of recanalization and success of mechanical thrombectomy during the acute phase of cerebral infarction[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra, 2020, 10(1): 28-35.
|
| [16] |
翟跃芬, 王虎清, 展淑琴, 等. 静脉溶栓治疗急性重度脑梗死的疗效及预后的不良相关危险因素: 152例随机对照临床试验[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2021, 41(9): 1426-1430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYJD202109020.htm
|
| [17] |
曲广枝, 蒋波, 孙秀丽, 等. 不同时间窗静脉溶栓对急性缺血性脑卒中患者临床疗效、血管再通和神经功能的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2021, 33(3): 91-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBGF202103022.htm
|
| [18] |
武华, 安建华, 杜慧杰, 等. 2017年-2019年某医院急性脑梗死静脉溶栓使用情况及病人院前延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2021, 19(6): 1030-1033. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYYY202106035.htm
|
| [19] |
陈实丽. 院前-院内一体化急救护理程序在急性脑出血患者救治中的应用价值[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘: 连续型电子期刊, 2019, 19(64): 257-258. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201964176.htm
|
| [20] |
罗亚丽, 朱贺变, 苗晋霞, 等. 院前院内一体化急诊护理模式在急性脑出血救治中的应用效果[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2021, 53(5): 626-628. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMYZ202105044.htm
|
© 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部
Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
DownLoad: