Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection

CHENG Mei; LI Liming; BAI Xiangwei; YUAN Mengyang; YUAN Fangfang

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20232842

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2024 > 28(6): 124-128. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842

CHENG Mei, LI Liming, BAI Xiangwei, YUAN Mengyang, YUAN Fangfang. Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(6): 124-128. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232842

Citation:

PDF (752 KB)

Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection

1.
Department of Nursing, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan, Zhengzhou, 453003
2.
Department of Emergency, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Heart Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 451464

More Information

Received Date: September 06, 2023
Revised Date: October 22, 2023
Available Online: April 01, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To establish sensitive indicators for the evaluation of emergency nursing quality in patients with acute aortic dissection.
Methods
Based on the three-dimensional quality theory model of "structure-process-outcome", evidence-based nursing methods were used to synthesize evidence and conduct two rounds of expert consultation to determine sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection.
Results
The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires were 100.00% and 94.12%, respectively. The judgment basis coefficients (Ca) of the experts who participated in the two rounds of consultation were 0.893 and 0.914, respectively, and the familiarity coefficients (Cs) were 0.902 and 0.921, respectively, and the authority coefficients (Cr) were 0.898 and 0.918, respectively. The Kendall coefficients of the first round of consultation experts for the first, second, and third-level indicators were 0.212, 0.247, and 0.327, respectively, and were 0.225, 0.349, and 0.257, respectively in the second round of consultation experts. Finally, the sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing of AAD patients were constructed, including 3 first-level indicators, 8 second-level indicators, and 29 third-level indicators.
Conclusion
The sensitive indicators for the quality of emergency nursing of AAD patients constructed in this study can be used as a basis for evaluating the quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection.
- acute aortic dissection,
- emergency nursing,
- sensitive indicators,
- Delphi method,
- evidence-based nursing,
- three-dimensional quality structure model

FullText(HTML)

References (17)

References

[1]	AKUTSU K. Etiology of aortic dissection[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 67(3): 271-276. doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01066-x
[2]	梁平, 张向京, 王颖. Stanford A型主动脉夹层围术期护理质量评价指标的构建[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(12): 2107-2112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202212006.htm
[3]	刘裕文, 李庆印, 刘湉, 等. 急性主动脉夹层患者急诊临床恶化动态预警方案的构建及应用研究[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2022, 3(6): 485-490. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLZH202206001.htm
[4]	张海燕, 李艳鑫. Stanford B型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复围术期护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(13): 2340-2346. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202313009.htm
[5]	DONABEDIAN A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966[J]. Milbank Q, 2005, 83(4): 691-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x
[6]	杨欣, 张健, 姜金霞, 等. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急救护理质量敏感指标体系的构建[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021, 27(26): 3578-3582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDLH202104009.htm
[7]	葛经武, 乔玫, 袁翠萍, 等. 持续质量改进缩短主动脉全弓置换术术前准备时间的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(23): 157-159. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201823049
[8]	OKOLI C, PAWLOWSKI S D. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications[J]. Inf Manag, 2004, 42(1): 15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
[9]	丁慧. 急诊科护理质量敏感性指标体系的构建[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2022.
[10]	刘莉, 喻翠英, 耿丽, 等. Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层实施多学科团队急救绿色手术通道的建立与应用效果[J]. 循证护理, 2023, 9(7): 1255-1259. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZHL202307021.htm
[11]	王宝珠, 李燕, 马翔, 等. 急性主动脉夹层早期CTA诊断价值研究[J]. 中国数字医学, 2019, 14(10): 2-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YISZ201910002.htm
[12]	徐伟, 陈晓莉, 林文风, 等. 急性主动脉夹层患者急诊目标血压管理的循证实践[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(7): 90-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202207026.htm
[13]	谈莉萍, 周意, 方芳, 等. 主动脉A型夹层围手术期护理质量敏感性指标的构建[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2020, 36(29): 2251-2257.
[14]	迪里夏提·斯提, 阿斯亚·阿不得斯木, 马翔. 急性主动脉夹层早期疼痛控制情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2018, 32(1): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNZD201801031.htm
[15]	秦嵩博, 由辰飞, 张伟佳, 等. 血清sST2在主动脉壁间血肿和主动脉夹层诊断中的价值[J]. 济宁医学院学报, 2022, 45(6): 410-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNYY202206006.htm
[16]	急诊胸痛心血管标志物联合检测共识专家组, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会急诊医学分会. 急诊胸痛心血管标志物检测专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022, 31(4): 448-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYW202202009.htm
[17]	褚志祥, 全小姣, 陈威, 等. 影响急诊患者长时间滞留的因素分析: 以三亚某医院为例[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2022, 17(6): 751-754. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTFS202206013.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (132) PDF downloads (7)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Construction of sensitive indicators of quality of emergency nursing in patients with acute aortic dissection

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content