SHI Haomin, YAN Su, QIAO Mengmeng, YANG Huilian. Research on gastric cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on machine learning algorithms[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 41-47, 61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233076
Citation: SHI Haomin, YAN Su, QIAO Mengmeng, YANG Huilian. Research on gastric cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on machine learning algorithms[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 41-47, 61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233076

Research on gastric cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on machine learning algorithms

More Information
  • Received Date: September 25, 2023
  • Revised Date: November 28, 2023
  • Available Online: January 22, 2024
  • Objective 

    To establish and validate a prediction model for gastric cancer lymph node metastasis based on four machine learning (ML) algorithms.

    Methods 

    A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 531 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. The patients were randomly divided into training set (399 patients) and test set (132 patients) in a ratio of 3 to 1. Univariate analysis was used to screen for variables associated with gastric cancer lymph node metastasis, and Logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor algorithm, and support vector machine algorithm models were established to rank the importance of variables. All ML algorithm models were validated in the test set, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. The optimal ML algorithm model was determined based on the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. A nomogram model was constructed based on the variable importance ranking of the optimal ML algorithm model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability of the nomogram model were evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curves.

    Results 

    The results of the comparison of the four ML algorithm models showed that the random forest model was the optimal algorithm model. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the random forest model in the training set were 72.7%, 69.9%, and 75.0%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.803. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the random forest model in the test set were 64.4%, 66.7%, and 62.5%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.751. A nomogram model was constructed based on the variables of the random forest algorithm model. The ROC curve showed that the AUCs of the nomogram model in the training set and test set were 0.721 and 0.776, respectively. Calibration curves and decision curves showed that the nomogram model had good calibration and clinical applicability in both the training set and test set.

    Conclusion 

    The random forest model is the optimal algorithm model among the four ML algorithm models. The nomogram model based on the random forest model can accurately predict the risk of gastric cancer lymph node metastasis, thereby better guiding clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions.

  • [1]
    KINAMI S, SAITO H, TAKAMURA H. Significance of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of gastric cancer and current challenges in determining the extent of metastasis[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 806162.
    [2]
    KIKUCHI S, KURODA S, NISHIZAKI M, et al. Management of early gastric cancer that meet the indication for radical lymph node dissection following endoscopic resection: a retrospective cohort analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 72. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0268-0
    [3]
    IASONOS A, SCHRAG D, RAJ G V, et al. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(8): 1364-1370. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9791
    [4]
    ZHAO L Y, YIN Y, LI X, et al. A nomogram composed of clinicopathologic features and preoperative serum tumor markers to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(37): 59630-59639. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10732
    [5]
    HANDELMAN G S, KOK H K, CHANDRA R V, et al. eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine[J]. J Intern Med, 2018, 284(6): 603-619. doi: 10.1111/joim.12822
    [6]
    LIU W C, LI Z Q, LUO Z W, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed thyroid cancer[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(8): 2802-2811. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3776
    [7]
    ZHU J, ZHENG J X, LI L F, et al. Application of machine learning algorithms to predict central lymph node metastasis in T1-T2, non-invasive, and clinically node negative papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Front Med, 2021, 8: 635771. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635771
    [8]
    SANTOS M K, FERREIRA JUNIOR J R, WADA D T, et al. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer-aided diagnosis, and radiomics: advances in imaging towards to precision medicine[J]. Radiol Bras, 2019, 52(6): 387-396. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2019.0049
    [9]
    KANG J, CHOI Y J, KIM I K, et al. LASSO-based machine learning algorithm for prediction of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2021, 53(3): 773-783. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.974
    [10]
    曹毛毛, 陈万青. GLOBOCAN 2020全球癌症统计数据解读[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志: 电子版, 2021, 13(3): 63-69.
    [11]
    SONGUN I, PUTTER H, KRANENBARG E M, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(5): 439-449. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X
    [12]
    LAWSON J D, SICKLICK J K, FANTA P T. Gastric cancer[J]. Curr Probl Cancer, 2011, 35(3): 97-127. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2011.03.001
    [13]
    MCCULLOCH P, NITA M E, KAZI H, et al. Extended versus limited lymph nodes dissection technique for adenocarcinoma of the stomach[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004(4): CD001964.
    [14]
    郑晋, 桑玉尔, 施伟斌. 胃癌病人淋巴结转移nomogram图预测模型构建及评价[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(5): 570-575, 580.
    [15]
    LIN J X, WANG Z K, WANG W, et al. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis or lymphovascular invasion for early gastric cancer: a practical and effective predictive model based on international multicenter data[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 1048. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6147-6
    [16]
    YIN X Y, PANG T, LIU Y, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2020, 18(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1778-2
    [17]
    BAI B L, WU Z Y, WENG S J, et al. Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in osteosarcoma[J]. Cancer Med, 2023, 12(4): 5025-5034. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5225
    [18]
    STERNE J A, WHITE I R, CARLIN J B, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls[J]. BMJ, 2009, 338: b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393
    [19]
    HONG W D, LU Y J, ZHOU X Y, et al. Usefulness of random forest algorithm in predicting severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 893294. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.893294
    [20]
    WANG R, ZUO C L, ZHANG R, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 199 and carbohydrate antigen 724 in gastric cancer and their relationship with clinical prognosis[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2023, 15(8): 1475-1485. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i8.1475
    [21]
    王妤, 褚嘉栋, 孙娜, 等. 围产期抑郁症辅助诊断预测模型的构建及机器学习算法的筛选[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(18): 93-99. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20232044
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 廖飞飞,杨文文,路爱梅,曲华,王洁,龙霖梓,付长庚. 麝香通心滴丸调控HIF-1α/HO-1通路抑制铁死亡缓解心肌缺血再灌注损伤研究. 陕西中医. 2025(02): 147-152+158 .
    2. 黄兴,寇冠军,范立华,张志国. 麝香通心滴丸的临床研究进展. 中医研究. 2024(09): 92-96 .
    3. 郑文辉,吴瑞华. 麝香通心滴丸治疗微血管性心绞痛的疗效及临床安全性. 中国卫生标准管理. 2024(21): 160-163+168 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (167) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return