| Citation: |
YANG Lei, FENG Yi, WANG Yang. Correlation between preoperative coagulation function and prognosis in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage undergoing emergency craniotomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(8): 83-87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240214
|
To investigate the relationship between preoperative coagulation function and prognosis in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage undergoing emergency craniotomy.
Eighty-two patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who underwent emergency craniotomy (observation group) and 50 healthy volunteers (control group) were retrospectively selected as study subjects. The patients in the observation group were further divided into mild-to-moderate group (31 cases) and severe groups (51 cases) based on Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at admission, and were divided into poor prognosis group (37 cases) and good prognosis group (45 cases) based on Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). The differences in preoperative coagulation function indicators among different groups were compared, and the predictive value of coagulation indicators for patients′ prognosis was analyzed.
The levels of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), thrombomodulin (TM), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of PT, APTT, INR, TM, and PAI-1 in the severe group were significantly higher than those in the mild-to-moderate group (P < 0.05). Compared with the good prognosis group, patients in the poor prognosis group had older age, longer bleeding time, and higher levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), PT, APTT, INR, TM, and PAI-1 (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis showed that PT, APTT, INR, TM, and PAI-1 all had certain diagnostic efficiency for poor prognosis in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage [area under the curve (AUC) values were all over 0.7], with INR of the highest diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.833) and PT of the lowest (AUC=0.762). Compared with single indicator, the AUC of combined detection of five coagulation function indicators for diagnosing poor prognosis was 0.942, with diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100.00% and 97.22%, respectively.
Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients generally have varying degrees of coagulation dysfunction before emergency craniotomy, and coagulation dysfunction is closely related to the degree of brain injury and poor prognosis. Combined detection of coagulation function indicators (PT, APTT, INR, TM, PAI-1) can provide a reference for clinical assessment of patients′ condition.
| [1] |
唐卉, 辜蕊, 周嫱, 等. 青年与中老年脑出血临床特点及预后分析[J]. 华西医学, 2021, 36(6): 741-746. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYX202106008.htm
|
| [2] |
潘榆春, 薛元峰, 胡红娟, 等. 颅内压及相关参数与老年高血压性脑出血预后的关系研究[J]. 临床神经外科杂志, 2020, 17(4): 405-407, 412. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSW202004011.htm
|
| [3] |
朱家双, 杨玉升, 黄建华, 等. 自发性脑出血评分联合凝血参数对自发性脑出血患者预后有评估价值[J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2023, 29(1): 46-48, 80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NKJW202301013.htm
|
| [4] |
李照建. 高血压脑出血的手术治疗[J]. 中国医刊, 2020, 55(4): 354-356. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYI202004004.htm
|
| [5] |
中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(9): 710-715.
|
| [6] |
游潮, 刘鸣, 于学忠, 等. 高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(8): 757-770. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJJY202103001.htm
|
| [7] |
XU J, XIE Z P, CHEN K, et al. The L-shaped correlation between systolic blood pressure and short-term and long-term mortality in patients with cerebral hemorrhage[J]. BMC Neurol, 2023, 23(1): 230. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03271-x
|
| [8] |
鲍洁, 王青. 高血压脑出血患者凝血功能与预后探讨[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2019, 25(5): 780-781, 784. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX201905022.htm
|
| [9] |
饶朝楷, 华军. 脑出血患者进行凝血功能检查在评估其预后的价值[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2019, 25(6): 975-976, 978. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX201906034.htm
|
| [10] |
ROH D, TORRES G L, CAI C Y, et al. Coagulation differences detectable in deep and lobar primary intracerebral hemorrhage using thromboelastography[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 87(5): 918-924. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa056
|
| [11] |
胡雪甫. 脑出血患者急性期凝血与纤溶功能的评估[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2020, 26(2): 185-186, 189. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX202002014.htm
|
| [12] |
张敬泉, 洪波. 脑出血患者血清TFPI-1、TF、FIB、NO水平表达情况及其临床意义[J]. 医学临床研究, 2019, 36(3): 549-551.
|
| [13] |
杨玉芳. 凝血功能指标在脑出血患者预后评估中的应用[J]. 实用检验医师杂志, 2021, 13(3): 171-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJCP202103012.htm
|
| [14] |
张莹, 程晓东, 胡玉皎, 等. 纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1(4G/5G)基因多态性与深静脉血栓事件的风险概率[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2020, 38(7): 513-515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCJY202007008.htm
|
| [15] |
陈燕青, 张奇, 李婷婷, 等. 凝血功能指标联合血栓弹力图参数对高血压脑出血预后的评估[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2021, 31(14): 1737-1740, 1769. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWJZ202114020.htm
|
| [16] |
孙帆, 周赤忠, 罗宽. 岛征与凝血功能对高血压脑出血血肿扩大预测价值研究[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2021, 38(10): 1075-1078. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFSJ202110004.htm
|
© 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部
Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
DownLoad: