Effect of shared medical appointments on blood glucose levels and self-management behavior in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

WANG Wanying; HAN Tingting; LU Xiaofan; XU Chong; ZHANG Ying; QI Yalan; YIN Huaping; ZOU Huiling; SUN Yu

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20241312

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2024 > 28(16): 109-113, 120. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241312

WANG Wanying, HAN Tingting, LU Xiaofan, XU Chong, ZHANG Ying, QI Yalan, YIN Huaping, ZOU Huiling, SUN Yu. Effect of shared medical appointments on blood glucose levels and self-management behavior in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(16): 109-113, 120. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241312

Citation:

PDF (911 KB)

Effect of shared medical appointments on blood glucose levels and self-management behavior in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

1.
Department of Endocrinology, Suqian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu, 223800
2.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Suqian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, Jiangsu, 223800

More Information

Received Date: March 28, 2024
Revised Date: May 13, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To investigate the impact of the Shared Medical Appointment (SMA) model on blood glucose levels and self-management behaviors in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods
A total of 87 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM at the Obstetrics and Gynecology and Endocrinology Outpatient Departments of the Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from October 2021 to October 2022 were enrolled and divided into treatment group (n=44) and control group (n=43). The treatment group received SMA-based GDM management, while the control group underwent routine outpatient follow-up. Baseline data, flash glucose monitoring (FGM)-related indicators before and after treatment, and self-management behavior scale scores were compared between the two groups.
Results
No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in age, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (P>0.05). After treatment, the time in range (TIR) of glucose was higher in the treatment group than that in the control group, while mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), coefficient of variation (CV), and mean blood glucose (MBG) were lower in the treatment group (P < 0.05). Within the treatment group, post-treatment TIR was higher, and MAGE, CV, SDBG, and MBG were lower than pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). In the control group, post-treatment TIR was higher, and SDBG and MBG were lower than pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). After treatment, the total score and scores for dietary management, exercise management, medication management, and blood glucose monitoring management in the self-management behavior scale were significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). In the treatment group, post-treatment scores for all self-management behaviors were higher than pre-treatment levels, while post-treatment total scores and scores for medication management and blood glucose monitoring management in the control group were higher than pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
SMA management model can comprehensively improve blood glucose levels and enhance self-management behavior capabilities in GDM patients.
- gestational diabetes,
- shared medical appointments,
- self-management behavior,
- flash glucose monitoring,
- blood sugar level,
- management mode

FullText(HTML)

References (22)

References

[1]	ALEJANDRO E U, MAMERTO T P, CHUNG G, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: a harbinger of the vicious cycle of diabetes[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(14): 5003.
[2]	RANI P R, BEGUM J. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, where do we stand[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(4): QE01-QE04.
[3]	CROWTHER C A, HILLER J E, MOSS J R, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352(24): 2477-2486.
[4]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会, 中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会. 妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[第二部分][J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(2): 81-90. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210917-00529
[5]	吴红花. 妊娠期高血糖人群的胰岛素应用[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019, 18(1): 14-17. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2019.01.005
[6]	EGGER G, STEVENS J, GANORA C, et al. Programmed shared medical appointments: a novel procedure for chronic disease management[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47(1/2): 70-75.
[7]	KAHKOSKA A R, BRAZEAU N F, LYNCH K A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of shared medical appointments for type 2 diabetes at a free, student-Run clinic in alamance county, north Carolina[J]. J Med Educ Train, 2018, 2(1): 032.
[8]	李逗逗, 姚瑶, 曹琳, 等. 专科护士主导的2型糖尿病患者共享门诊的构建及应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(1): 17-22.
[9]	中华医学会糖尿病学分会血糖监测学组. 中国扫描式葡萄糖监测技术临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(11): 697-700. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.11.001
[10]	Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: a World Health Organization Guideline[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2014, 103(3): 341-363.
[11]	MCLEAN A, BARR E, TABUAI G, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring metrics in high-risk pregnant women with type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023, 25(12): 836-844.
[12]	CHOW S C, SHAO J, WANG H S. A note on sample size calculation for mean comparisons based on noncentral t-statistics[J]. J Biopharm Stat, 2002, 12(4): 441-456.
[13]	杨康宁. 2型糖尿病患者行共享门诊管理模式对患者血糖水平及健康饮食行为的影响[J]. 新疆医学, 2022, 52(10): 1223-1225, 1250.
[14]	万巧琴, 尚少梅, 来小彬等. 2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为量表的信、效度研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2008, 24(7): 26-27. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2008.07.009
[15]	YE W R, LUO C, HUANG J, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2022, 377: e067946.
[16]	SWEETING A, WONG J, MURPHY H R, et al. A clinical update on gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Endocr Rev, 2022, 43(5): 763-793.
[17]	FREEMAN K, BIDWELL J. Lifestyle medicine: shared medical appointments[J]. J Fam Pract, 2022, 71(Suppl 1 Lifestyle): S62-S65.
[18]	HAYHOE B, VERMA A, KUMAR S. Shared medical appointments[J]. BMJ, 2017, 358: j4034.
[19]	KAHKOSKA A R, BRAZEAU N F, LYNCH K A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of shared medical appointments for type 2 diabetes at a free, student-Run clinic in alamance county, north Carolina[J]. J Med Educ Train, 2018, 2(1): 032.
[20]	EE C, COURTEN B D, AVARD N, et al. Shared medical appointments and mindfulness for type 2 diabetes-a mixed-methods feasibility study[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2020, 11: 570777.
[21]	RAYMOND J K. Models of care for adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes in transition: shared medical appointments and telemedicine[J]. Pediatr Ann, 2017, 46(5): e193-e197.
[22]	RILEY S B. Improving diabetes outcomes by an innovative group visit model: a pilot study[J]. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 2013, 25(9): 466-472.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (90) PDF downloads (4)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effect of shared medical appointments on blood glucose levels and self-management behavior in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content