ZHOU Chuanhai, WANG Lijun, HE Yuanxu, QIN Dong. Effects of two different femtosecond laser surgeries for the treatment of thin corneal myopic astigmatism[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 48-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242740
Citation: ZHOU Chuanhai, WANG Lijun, HE Yuanxu, QIN Dong. Effects of two different femtosecond laser surgeries for the treatment of thin corneal myopic astigmatism[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 48-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242740

Effects of two different femtosecond laser surgeries for the treatment of thin corneal myopic astigmatism

More Information
  • Received Date: June 27, 2024
  • Revised Date: October 09, 2024
  • Objective 

    To explore the effect of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) femtosecond laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with thin cornea.

    Methods 

    From September 2022 to September 2023, 128 patients with thin cornea myopic astigmatism in the hospital were selected and randomly divided into FS-LASIK group (64 cases, 128 eyes, receiving FS-LASIK) and SMILE group (64 cases, 124 eyes, receiving SMILE). The visual acuity [uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)] before surgery and at 1 year after surgery, refractive parameter spherical equivalent (SE) at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery, corneal surface morphology [average corneal curvature (KAve), surface regularity index (SRI), surface asymmetry index (SAI)] before surgery and at 1 year after surgery, corneal biomechanic indicators[corneal expansion comprehensive deviation analysis index (BAD-D), corneal biomechanical index (CBI), total biomechanical index (TBI)] and corneal injury degree [corneal endothelial cell count, corneal endothelial cell size, coefficient of variation (CV)] and differences in postoperative astigmatism correction vector indicators [magnitude of error (ME), angle of error (AE), correction index (CI), and index of success (IOS)] were compared. Residual stromal bed thickness and the incidence of complications after surgery were recorded.

    Results 

    One year after surgery, both UCVA and BCVA in both groups were improved compared with preoperation (P < 0.05), but there were no significant between-group differences (P>0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the SE levels in both groups were higher than preoperation (P < 0.05); however, there were no statistically significant differences in SE levels between the groups at above time points (P>0.05). One year after surgery, KAve, SRI, and SAI in both groups were lower than preoperative levels, and the SMILE group was lower than those in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.05). One year after operation, BAD-D and TBI in both groups were higher than preoperative levels, while CBI was lower than preoperative levels; however, BAD-D and TBI in the SMILE group were lower than those in the FS-LASIK group, and CBI was higher than that in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.05). One year after surgery, corneal endothelial cell counts in both groups were lower than preoperative levels, and CV of corneal endothelial cell size was higher than preoperative levels; however, corneal endothelial cell count in the SMILE group were higher than those in the FS-LASIK group, and the CV of corneal endothelial cell size was lower than that in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in ME, AE, CI, and IOS between the two groups (P>0.05). The residual stromal bed thickness was (302.01±55.03) μm in the FS-LASIK group and (310.23±46.03) μm in the SMILE group after surgery, with no statistically significant between-group difference (t=1.284, P=0.200). One year after surgery, there were 5 cases of dry eye in the FS-LASIK group and 2 cases in the SMILE group, with no statistically significant difference in incidence of dry eye between the two groups (χ2=1.227, P=0.268).

    Conclusion 

    For patients with myopic astigmatism with thin cornea, both FS-LASIK and SMILE can achieve satisfactory improvement in visual acuity and refractive state, and the latter one has a relatively small impact on the integrity of corneal structure, biomechanical stability and surgical injury.

  • [1]
    杜玉芹, 周春阳, 周跃华, 等. 智能脉冲技术的Trans-PRK矫正近视散光术后角膜形态及视觉质量观察[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2022, 40(11): 1078-1084. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190924-00413
    [2]
    邹昊翰, 王雁, 崔彤, 等. 飞秒激光小切口角膜透镜取出术前后主导眼变化及其影响因素[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2022, 40(11): 1085-1089. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190306-00101
    [3]
    徐恒, 李飞, 杨杰, 等. FS-LASIK与SMILE手术矫正低度近视散光的疗效比较[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2023, 32(5): 267-271, 299.
    [4]
    许杨, 牛晓光, 刘莉, 等. FS-LASIK术后早期角膜上皮厚度变化特点及其相关影响因素分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2023, 23(9): 1550-1554.
    [5]
    王涛, 崔月玲, 宋钊曦, 等. 不同角膜表面处理方式在全飞秒SMILE手术中的应用效果分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2023, 23(14): 2741-2744, 2740.
    [6]
    《眼科人工智能临床应用伦理专家共识(2023)》专家组, 中国医药教育协会数字影像与智能医疗分会, 中国医药教育协会智能医学专业委员会. 眼科人工智能临床应用伦理专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2023, 41(1): 1-7.
    [7]
    苏哲, 卢艳, 袁青, 等. 近视患者角膜生物力学参数与像差的相关性分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(6): 108-112. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20234001
    [8]
    宋耀文, 贺瑞, 周迎霞. 薄角膜的近视散光眼行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜生物力学状态长期观察[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2017, 26(2): 74-79, 116.
    [9]
    李晖, 汪明红, 廖风玲, 等. FS-lasik与ICL植入术治疗高度近视的效果及对术后高阶像差的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2022, 37(12): 1579-1582.
    [10]
    谭倩, 马代金. SMILE与FS-LASIK术后视觉质量比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(8): 468-475.
    [11]
    BAI H R, SUN J J, SHI X J, et al. Visual performance and rotational stability of a multifocal toric intraocular lens in myopic eyes[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2023, 261(9): 2557-2565.
    [12]
    SIEDLECKI J, SCHMELTER V, SCHWORM B, et al. Corneal wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after small incision lenticule extraction[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2020, 98(7): e907-e913.
    [13]
    BAO F J, LOPES B T, ZHENG X B, et al. Corneal biomechanics losses caused by refractive surgery[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2023, 48(2): 137-143. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36001080/
    [14]
    DIAS RATES E R, ALMEIDA C D, DE PAULA FIOD COSTA E, et al. Evaluation of biophysical alterations in the epithelial and endothelial layer of patients with Bullous Keratopathy[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2024, 240: 109791.
    [15]
    FU D, ZHAO Y, ZHOU X. Corneal biomechanical properties after small incision lenticule extraction surgery on thin Cornea[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2021, 46(2): 168-173.
    [16]
    CHOU C C, SHIH P J, JOU T S, et al. Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Osteogenesis Imperfecta With Collagen Defec[J]t. Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2023, 12(1): 14.
    [17]
    蒋佳倩, 孙平, 陈放, 等. FS-LASIK后外伤性角膜瓣皱褶一例[J]. 眼科, 2023, 32(3): 263-264.
    [18]
    王萌萌, 王晶晶, 尹会, 等. Ziemer LDV Z6飞秒激光机制作角膜瓣的FS-LASIK手术并发症处理和长期疗效评价[J]. 眼科新进展, 2021, 41(3): 227-230.

Catalog

    Article views (103) PDF downloads (11) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return