Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software

ZHANG Kaiyue; WEI Lai; HUANG Yuanpeng

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20243021

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2024 > 28(23): 1-7. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243021

ZHANG Kaiyue, WEI Lai, HUANG Yuanpeng. Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 1-7. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243021

Citation:

PDF (4241 KB)

Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software

1.
Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700
2.
Xiamen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, 361015

More Information

Received Date: July 17, 2024
Revised Date: September 06, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To conduct a visual analysis of the literature related to Mendelian randomization (MR) studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software.
Methods
English literature on MR studies in the field of cancer was searched in the Web of Science Core Collection database, and Chinese literature was searched in CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases. The search period ranged from the inception of the databases to April 18, 2024. CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software was used to perform a visual analysis of the publication trends, authors, institutions, and keywords of the included literature through knowledge mapping.
Results
A total of 964 English articles and 121 Chinese articles were included in this study. The annual publication of English and Chinese literature on MR studies in the field of cancer showed an overall upward trend, but there was limited collaboration among authors and institutions. The analysis of keywords in both English and Chinese literature revealed that breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer were the key cancer types, with sex hormones and low back pain as the main associated factors. Research hotspots lasting for more than five years included genetic polymorphism, colorectal cancer, and genome-wide association studies. The recent research hotspots focused on insulin, renal cell carcinoma, and endometrial cancer.
Conclusion
MR studies have been extensively conducted in the field of cancer and have become a research hotspot. However, collaboration among authors and institutions still need to be strengthened. The inherent limitations of the research methodology itself can lead to issues such as insufficiency of MR study evidence and conflicting results among different studies. Future MR studies should integrate other disciplines and epidemiological research methods to provide more comprehensive causal evidence.
- cancer,
- Mendelian randomization,
- CiteSpace,
- knowledge map,
- bibliometric analysis,
- visual analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (29)

References

[1]	BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, WEIDERPASS E, et al. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide[J]. Cancer, 2021, 127(16): 3029-3030. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33587
[2]	NAM A S, CHALIGNE R, LANDAU D A. Integrating genetic and non-genetic determinants of cancer evolution by single-cell multi-omics[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2021, 22(1): 3-18.
[3]	梅凡, 姚明宏, 王雨宁, 等. 随机和非随机干预研究的证据整合研究进展[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(9): 1102-1109.
[4]	TOBIN M D, MINELLI C, BURTON P R, et al. Commentary: development of Mendelian randomization: from hypothesis test to "Mendelian deconfounding"[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2004, 33(1): 26-29. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh016
[5]	GALA H, TOMLINSON I. The use of Mendelian randomisation to identify causal cancer risk factors: promise and limitations[J]. J Pathol, 2020, 250(5): 541-554. doi: 10.1002/path.5421
[6]	姚雪, 徐川平, 李杰, 等. 基于普赖斯定律和二八定律及在线投稿系统构建某科技期刊核心作者用户库[J]. 编辑学报, 2017, 29(1): 64-66.
[7]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009
[8]	DAVIES N M, HOLMES M V, DAVEY SMITH G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians[J]. BMJ, 2018, 362: k601.
[9]	SEKULA P, DEL GRECO M F, PATTARO C, et al. Mendelian randomization as an approach to assess causality using observational data[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 27(11): 3253-3265. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010098
[10]	BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834
[11]	CORNISH A J, LAW P J, TIMOFEEVA M, et al. Modifiable pathways for colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(1): 55-62. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30294-8
[12]	SHEN J Y, ZHOU H Q, LIU J Q, et al. A modifiable risk factors atlas of lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(13): 4587-4603. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4015
[13]	刘春语, 程思, 庞元捷, 等. 饮茶与恶性肿瘤发病风险关联的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2023, 44(7): 1027-1036. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230217-00086
[14]	CHEN X, KONG J Q, DIAO X Y, et al. Depression and prostate cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(23): 9160-9167. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3493
[15]	吴鹏飞. 腰背痛的全基因组关联研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.
[16]	MURPHY N, SONG M Y, PAPADIMITRIOU N, et al. Associations between glycemic traits and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2022, 114(5): 740-752. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac011
[17]	NOUNU A, KAR S P, RELTON C L, et al. Sex steroid hormones and risk of breast cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2022, 24(1): 66. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01553-9
[18]	COSTA A R, LANÇA DE OLIVEIRA M, CRUZ I, et al. The sex bias of cancer[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2020, 31(10): 785-799. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2020.07.002
[19]	CHEN F, WEN W Q, LONG J R, et al. Mendelian randomization analyses of 23 known and suspected risk factors and biomarkers for breast cancer overall and by molecular subtypes[J]. Int J Cancer, 2022, 151(3): 372-380. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34026
[20]	LARSSON S C, BURGESS S. Causal role of high body mass index in multiple chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies[J]. BMC Med, 2021, 19(1): 320. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02188-x
[21]	ZHOU W, LIU G, HUNG R J, et al. Causal relationships between body mass index, smoking and lung cancer: Univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization[J]. Int J Cancer, 2021, 148(5): 1077-1086. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33292
[22]	LOH N Y, WANG W Y, NOORDAM R, et al. Obesity, fat distribution and risk of cancer in women and men: a Mendelian randomisation study[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(24): 5259. doi: 10.3390/nu14245259
[23]	BULL C J, BELL J A, MURPHY N, et al. Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study[J]. BMC Med, 2020, 18(1): 396. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01855-9
[24]	HAO Y, XIAO J Y, LIANG Y, et al. Reassessing the causal role of obesity in breast cancer susceptibility: a comprehensive multivariable Mendelian randomization investigating the distribution and timing of exposure[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2023, 52(1): 58-70. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac143
[25]	SUZUKI S, GOTO A, NAKATOCHI M, et al. Body mass index and colorectal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study[J]. Cancer Sci, 2021, 112(4): 1579-1588. doi: 10.1111/cas.14824
[26]	DENG Y Y, WANG L, HUANG J J, et al. Associations between potential causal factors and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies[J]. J Dig Dis, 2022, 23(8/9): 435-445.
[27]	MARKOZANNES G, KANELLOPOULOU A, DIMOPOULOU O, et al. Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer[J]. BMC Med, 2022, 20(1): 41. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02246-y
[28]	WANG J, WANG H, CHEN Y, et al. Alcohol ingestion and colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis based on a Mendelian randomization approach[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13(5): e71-e78. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02530.x
[29]	LI T, NING Z, YANG Z J, et al. Total genetic contribution assessment across the human genome[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 2845. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23124-w

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

1.	齐晏. 定向软通道治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的术后康复护理体会. 中国社区医师. 2021(33): 152-153 .
2.	余娇，朱雪平. 脑电治疗仪联合康复护理在高血压性脑出血术后脑功能障碍患者中的应用. 医疗装备. 2020(03): 151-152 .
3.	胡钜强，吴以艺，林球润. 基底节区脑出血软通道引流术的应用效果评价. 黑龙江医药. 2020(02): 385-387 .
4.	陈旭文. 高血压脑出血术后瘫痪患者中运用早期康复护理的效果分析. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2020(25): 62-63 .
5.	陈小风. 早期康复护理对高血压脑出血颅内血肿清除术患者的并发症及生活能力的影响分析. 心血管病防治知识. 2020(25): 56-58 .
6.	胡婷. 针对性护理干预在基底节区高血压脑出血患者围手术期中的应用. 黑龙江医药科学. 2019(02): 237-238 .
7.	阮奶玲，游妹妹. 高血压护理教学实践中循证护理的运用效果观察. 心血管病防治知识(学术版). 2019(16): 68-69 .
8.	段春芝，柯慧. 早期介入针刺结合现代康复护理用于脑出血术后临床疗效观察. 辽宁中医药大学学报. 2019(10): 204-207 .
9.	顾华丽，赵艳君. 护患平行沟通法在基底节区高血压脑出血患者术后的应用价值. 河南医学研究. 2019(21): 3993-3995 .
10.	赵月. 早期康复护理对高血压脑出血后遗症患者独立生活能力和负性情绪的作用分析. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(85): 10-11 .
11.	罗燕. 康复护理对高血压患者血压控制的影响. 现代诊断与治疗. 2019(19): 3475-3476 .
12.	张珍珠，周巧玲. 小儿先天性心脏病实施以家庭为中心的术后康复护理效果观察. 心血管病防治知识(学术版). 2019(24): 74-76 .
13.	吕雅飞，王燕锋，陈君霞，刘进. 早期康复护理对高血压脑出血后遗症患者独立生活能力和负性情绪的作用. 中国现代医生. 2019(35): 132-134+139 .
14.	刘爱举. 不同康复介入时间对脑出血神经功能、日常生活能力的影响. 中国继续医学教育. 2018(17): 148-150 .
15.	梁其志，伍益，昌大平. 定向软通道置软管血肿吸引术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效分析. 现代医院. 2018(01): 96-97+101 .
16.	肖颖. 基底节区脑出血患者的围手术期护理. 中国现代药物应用. 2018(03): 137-138 .
17.	霍峻峰，陈小兵. 软通道血肿抽吸术联合中药分期治疗高血压脑出血的效果. 深圳中西医结合杂志. 2018(19): 8-9 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (187) PDF downloads (52) Cited by(18)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content