ZHANG Xiaoli, TIAN Chunyan. Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 99-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244086
Citation: ZHANG Xiaoli, TIAN Chunyan. Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 99-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20244086

Risk factors of preeclampsia complicated with renal impairment and construction of prediction model

More Information
  • Received Date: September 06, 2024
  • Revised Date: December 23, 2024
  • Objective 

    To analyze the influencing factors of preeclampsia (PE) complicated with renal impairment and construct a prediction model.

    Methods 

    The clinical materials of 300 PE patients with antenatal examination in the hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into modeling set of 200 cases and validation set of 100 cases by a random number table in a ratio of 2 to 1. All the patients were followed up for 3 months after delivery. Patients in the modeling set with renal impairment were included in occurrence group, and the rest were included in non-occurrence group. Clinical materials between the modeling set and the validation set as well as between the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group within the modeling set were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors of renal impairment in PE and construct a prediction model. The model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

    Results 

    There was no significant difference in clinical data between the modeling set and validation set (P>0.05). After completion of follow-up for 300 PE patients, renal impairment occurred in 75 cases (25.00%), including 24 cases (24.00%) in the validation set and 51 cases (25.50%) in the modeling set. A total of 51 patients with renal impairment in the modeling set were included in the occurrence group, and the remaining 149 patients were included in the non-occurrence group. Compared with the non-occurrence group, the occurrence group had significant older age, higher proportions of HELLP syndrome, early-onset PE and severe manifestations of PE, increased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) of renal interlobar artery as well as decreased peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of renal interlobar artery and platelet (PLT) (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, HELLP syndrome, early-onset of PE, severe manifestations of PE, and RI of renal interlobar artery were influencing factors of renal impairment in PE (P < 0.05). A prediction model for renal impairment in PE was established based on the results of Logistic regression analysis in the modeling set. The area under the curve (AUC) of this model for predicting renal impairment was 0.949 (95%CI, 0.917 to 0.971) in the modeling set and 0.944 (95%CI, 0.900 to 0.972) in the validation set. Calibration curves for the modeling set and validation set were plotted, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant differences (P>0.05). Internal validation by the Bootstrap method showed consistency index was 0.913 (95%CI, 0.828 to 0.998) for the modeling set and 0.907 (95%CI, 0.840 to 0.974) for the validation set. According to DCA, the clinical net benefit of the prediction model was obtained at risk thresholds of 0.13 to 0.92 for the modeling set and 0.18 to 0.87 for the validation set.

    Conclusion 

    The influencing factors of renal impairment in PE include age, HELLP syndrome, early-onset of PE, severe manifestations of PE, and RI of renal interlobar artery. The prediction model established based on these factors demonstrates good performance in predicting renal impairment in PE, providing evidences for clinical assessment of renal impairment risk in PE.

  • [1]
    ROCHA G. Consequences of early-onset preeclampsia on neonatal morbidity and mortality[J]. Minerva Pediatr, 2023, 75(1): 87-97.
    [2]
    CHAPPELL L C, CLUVER C A, KINGDOM J, et al. Pre-eclampsia[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10297): 341-354.
    [3]
    戴鑫伟, 朱利平, 汪云. 子痫前期和慢性高血压并发子痫前期的临床特点及母儿结局[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2022, 33(9): 64-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2022.09.011
    [4]
    VILLALAÍN GONZÁLEZ C, HERRAIZ GARCÍA I, FERNÁNDEZ-FRIERA L, et al. Cardiovascular and renal health: Preeclampsia as a risk marker[J]. Nefrologia, 2023, 43(3): 269-280.
    [5]
    中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(4): 227-238.
    [6]
    王铖, 桑婉玥, 吕忠英, 等. 脉搏波传导速度与中青年原发性高血压患者早期肾损害的相关性及诊断价值[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2020, 28(1): 44-48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3949.2020.01.009
    [7]
    OVERTON E, TOBES D, LEE A. Preeclampsia diagnosis and management[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2022, 36(1): 107-121.
    [8]
    毕新颖, 卢勇, 贾立杨, 等. 氧化应激指标联合子宫动脉血流动力学参数对妊娠期高血压疾病的预测效能[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(4): 45-49. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20233320
    [9]
    陈思宇, 白兰, 周宇. 子痫前期患者不规则趋化因子表达及其与血清炎症因子水平和妊娠结局的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(16): 84-88. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20230192
    [10]
    赵静, 毛小梅. 子痫前期患者外周血中TLR-4、HMGB1的表达水平及其对肾损伤的诊断价值[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(10): 1501-1504, 1508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.10.017
    [11]
    SAMEJIMA T, YAMASHITA T, TAKEDA Y, et al. Low antithrombin levels accompanied by high urine protein/creatinine ratios are predictive of acute kidney injury among CS patients with preeclampsia[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021, 34(10): 1550-1556.
    [12]
    李引弟, 宋渊丽, 李雪峰. 血清肝细胞生长因子和富亮氨酸α2糖蛋白1水平与子痫前期及急性肾损伤的相关性分析[J]. 中国医药, 2023, 18(4): 555-559.
    [13]
    PALMRICH P, BINDER C, ZEISLER H, et al. Awareness of obstetricians for long-term risks in women with a history of preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 305(3): 581-587.
    [14]
    卞显凤. 轻度子痫前期孕妇甲状腺功能减退与肾损伤的相关性[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 1331-1334, 1339.
    [15]
    CORREA-DE-ARAUJO R, YOON S S S. Clinical outcomes in high-risk pregnancies due to advanced maternal age[J]. J Womens Health, 2021, 30(2): 160-167.
    [16]
    LI B Y, YANG H X. Comparison of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes in early- and late-onset preeclampsia with HELLP syndrome: a 10-year retrospective study from a tertiary hospital and referral center in China[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 186. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04466-9
    [17]
    CHEWCHARAT A, KATTAH A G, THONGPRAYOON C, et al. Comparison of hospitalization outcomes for delivery and resource utilization between pregnant women with kidney transplants and chronic kidney disease in the United States[J]. Nephrology, 2021, 26(11): 879-889.
    [18]
    于璐, 徐晓英. 高龄孕妇早发型重度子痫前期不良结局列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(11): 43-48, 79. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20223517
    [19]
    SALEHI M G, SHOBEIRI E, NALEINI F, et al. Diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasound indices of maternal renal interlobar vasculature in the prediction of preeclampsia[J]. J Med Life, 2021, 14(2): 277-283.
    [20]
    毕大磊, 郅树升. 老年腹股沟疝腹腔镜术后复发的因素分析及风险预测可视化模型构建[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2024, 26(3): 25-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2024.03.005
    [21]
    陈双, 雷海科, 唐鑫怡, 等. 基于外周血炎症指标的重症成人社区获得性肺炎预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2024, 45(3): 282-288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130.2024.03.006
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 顾频颉,邱霖,佟阳,曹培华,胡祎,金咏梅. 基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的健康教育在乳腺癌术后淋巴水肿患者中的应用. 中国肿瘤临床与康复. 2025(02): 127-134 .
    2. 安德侠. 加速康复外科理念联合人性化护理在乳腺切除患者中的应用. 妇儿健康导刊. 2024(03): 175-178 .
    3. 包晴霞. 目标执行理念的健康教育对乳腺癌淋巴水肿患者上肢功能锻炼依从性及上肢功能的影响. 现代养生. 2024(12): 912-916 .
    4. 贾巍,宋瑞,王勇,孙霞,董江萌,杨进强. 运动胶带包扎和弹性加压包扎对乳腺癌改良根治术后上肢淋巴水肿的疗效对比. 广西医学. 2024(04): 596-599 .
    5. 乔娜,周飞. 改良式简易锻炼法在乳腺癌术后患者康复中的应用. 反射疗法与康复医学. 2024(01): 75-77+85 .
    6. 黄胜君. 基于保护动机理论的延续性功能锻炼干预对乳腺癌术后出院患者上肢功能评定量表简式评分的影响. 基层医学论坛. 2024(22): 82-84+111 .
    7. 赵迪,马建萍,杨红梅. 新辅助化疗后保乳术与改良根治术治疗Ⅱb~Ⅲa期乳腺癌的临床疗效对比. 中国临床医生杂志. 2024(08): 957-960 .
    8. 单海茂,顾烨,戴胜男,沈霞. 渐进式康复护理联合自制康复操微视频对乳腺癌根治术后患者肩关节活动度及自理能力的影响. 名医. 2024(08): 156-158 .
    9. 吕子岩,蓝敏. 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的康复治疗. 加速康复外科杂志. 2024(02): 86-90 .
    10. 王娟,欧阳婷. 利用微信平台实施功能锻炼量化管理对乳腺癌术后化疗患者康复的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2023(06): 900-904 .
    11. 李红莉,赵宏. 围手术期快速康复外科护理对乳腺癌患者术后日常生活能力的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(14): 136-138 .
    12. 林晓艳. 基于绘画训练的功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者淋巴水肿、患侧肢体功能的影响. 哈尔滨医药. 2023(04): 110-112 .
    13. 赖培芬,陈丽芬. 早期功能锻炼在改善乳腺癌改良根治术患者依从性、患肢功能和生活质量的作用分析. 中国冶金工业医学杂志. 2023(05): 599-600 .
    14. 鹿岁岁,杨妮妮,孟盼丽,陈星星,李晓伟. 早期量化活动训练结合正念减压疗法对乳腺癌根治术后患者上肢功能及疾病自我感受负担的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(32): 165-168 .
    15. 李楠,王园园. 早期阶段性功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者运动耐力与肢体功能恢复的影响. 临床研究. 2023(12): 104-107 .
    16. 徐梦姗,庞欣欣,刘侠,岳亚丽,张昭,陈安玥,毛杨. 芪珍胶囊辅助治疗对乳腺癌T淋巴细胞亚群肿瘤标志物的影响及预后分析. 河北医学. 2023(11): 1922-1926 .
    17. 徐艳丽,刘瑞勤,石明明,罗瑞雪. 肩关节运动八式康复锻炼在乳腺癌改良根治术后病人中的应用. 全科护理. 2022(10): 1377-1379 .
    18. 黄娇凤,施林芳,王文清. 量化患肢功能锻炼联合护理干预对早期乳腺癌术后患者功能训练依从性、生存质量影响研究. 中国医药指南. 2022(19): 31-34 .
    19. 庞玲玲. 家庭为中心模式对乳腺癌改良根治术后患者家庭关怀度评分及康复效果的影响. 黑龙江医学. 2022(20): 2506-2508 .
    20. 孙兴美. 快速康复外科综合护理方案在乳腺癌手术患者护理中的应用. 航空航天医学杂志. 2022(12): 1531-1534 .
    21. 胡广杰,马晓青,付晓红,贾海全,孙静. 早期功能锻炼对乳腺癌术后患者肩关节功能的影响. 癌症进展. 2022(23): 2462-2464+2472 .
    22. 何岩,丁新. 基于个案管理的综合康复护理在早期乳腺癌术后患者中的应用效果. 中西医结合护理(中英文). 2022(12): 112-114 .
    23. 王金环. 乳腺癌术后患者采取肩关节活动操的临床价值研究. 中国现代药物应用. 2021(19): 221-223 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(25)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return