内镜下放射状切开术治疗食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的护理操作配合

叶小芳, 孙建萍, 王璐, 陈娣, 刘军

叶小芳, 孙建萍, 王璐, 陈娣, 刘军. 内镜下放射状切开术治疗食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的护理操作配合[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(14): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214656
引用本文: 叶小芳, 孙建萍, 王璐, 陈娣, 刘军. 内镜下放射状切开术治疗食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的护理操作配合[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(14): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214656
YE Xiaofang, SUN Jianping, WANG Lu, CHEN Di, LIU Jun. Nursing cooperation for stenosis after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with endoscopic radial incision[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(14): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214656
Citation: YE Xiaofang, SUN Jianping, WANG Lu, CHEN Di, LIU Jun. Nursing cooperation for stenosis after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with endoscopic radial incision[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(14): 22-25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214656

内镜下放射状切开术治疗食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的护理操作配合

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    孙建萍, E-mail: 9514569@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R571;R472.3

Nursing cooperation for stenosis after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with endoscopic radial incision

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    观察内镜下放射状切开术(ERI)治疗食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后狭窄的疗效,总结围术期护理及术中操作配合要点。

    方法 

    收集11例食管ESD后狭窄患者的临床资料。比较患者手术前后狭窄处直径、吞咽困难评分,记录手术相关并发症的发生情况,分析围术期护理及术中操作配合对手术效果及安全性的影响。

    结果 

    11例患者均完成ERI,平均狭窄长度为(2.72±1.48)cm,平均手术时间为(25.45±16.00)min,所有患者均未出现穿孔、出血等并发症。11例患者术前平均吞咽困难评分为(3.09±0.54)分,术后第5天降至(1.18±0.60)分,术后3、6个月降至(1.45±0.69)、(1.80±0.98)分,与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。11例患者术前、术后5 d及术后3、6个月时狭窄处直径依次为(0.34±0.14)、(1.26±0.19)、(1.16±0.22)、(1.14±0.20)cm,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

    结论 

    ERI用于食管ESD后狭窄的治疗是安全有效的,术中医护间的默契配合能提高手术安全性,围术期规范护理则能促进患者康复。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To observe the efficacy of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) in the treatment of stenosis after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and to summarize the key points of perioperative nursing and intraoperative operation cooperation.

    Methods 

    Clinical materials of 11 patients with stenosis after esophageal ESD were collected. The diameter of stenosis and dysphagia score were compared before and after operation in all the patients, the incidence condition of operation related complications was recorded, and the influence of perioperative nursing and intraoperative cooperation on the efficacy and safety of operation was analyzed.

    Results 

    All the 11 patients completed ERI, the average stenosis length was (2.72±1.48) cm, the average operation time was (25.45±16.00) min, and no perforation, bleeding and other complications were observed in all the patients. The average dysphagia score of 11 patients was (3.09±0.54) points before operation, which decreased to (1.18±0.60) points on the fifth day after operation and (1.45±0.69) and (1.80±0.98) points at 3 and 6 months after operation, and there were significant differences when compared to the score before operation (P<0.05). The diameters of stenosis in 11 patients were (0.34±0.14), (1.26±0.19), (1.16±0.22) and (1.14±0.20) cm at the time points of before operation, 5 days after operation, 3 months and 6 months after operation, which showed significant differences when compared to diameter before operation (P<0.05).

    Conclusion 

    ERI is safe and effective in the treatment of stenosis after esophageal ESD. The tacit cooperation between doctors and nurses can improve the safety of operation, and standardized perioperative nursing can promote the rehabilitation of patients.

  • 表  1   11例患者手术前后狭窄处直径及吞咽困难评分比较(x±s)

      时点 狭窄处直径/cm 吞咽困难评分/分
    ERI术前 0.34±0.14 3.09±0.54
    术后5 d 1.26±0.19 1.18±0.60
    术后3个月 1.16±0.22 1.45±0.69
    术后6个月 1.14±0.20 1.80±0.98
    F 19.190 18.970
    P <0.001 <0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    ONO S, FUJISHIRO M, NIIMI K, et al. Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms[J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41(8): 661-665. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214867

    [2]

    SUN D, SHI Q, LI R, et al. Experience in simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection treating synchronous multiple primary early esophageal cancers[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(7): 921-925. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0023

    [3] 王程浩, 韩泳涛. 2020年中国临床肿瘤学会《食管癌诊疗指南》解读[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2020, 33(4): 285-290. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2020.04.001
    [4]

    POINCLOUX L, ROUQUETTE O, ABERGEL A. Endoscopic treatment of benign esophageal strictures: a literature review[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 11(1): 53-64. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1260002

    [5]

    CHIU Y C, HSU C C, CHIU K W, et al. Factors influencing clinical applications of endoscopic balloon dilation for benign esophageal strictures[J]. Endoscopy, 2004, 36(7): 595-600. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814520

    [6]

    MUTO M, EZOE Y, YANO T, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic radial incision and cutting method for refractory esophagogastric anastomotic stricture (with video)[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 75(5): 965-972. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.012

    [7] 王璐, 王维钊, 周平红, 等. 内镜下放射状切开术治疗难治性上消化道良性狭窄的临床研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2021, 27(9): 26-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ202109005.htm
    [8]

    WEN J, LU Z S, LINGHU E Q, et al. Prevention of esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection with the injection of botulinum toxin type A[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 84(4): 606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1484

    [9]

    VAN VILSTEREN F G I, POUW R E, SEEWALD S, et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Gut, 2011, 60(6): 765-773. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.229310

    [10]

    KADOTA T, YANO T, KATO T, et al. Prophylactic steroid administration for strictures after endoscopic resection of large superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2016, 4(12): E1267-E1274. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118291

    [11]

    SATO H, INOUE H, KOBAYASHI Y, et al. Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 78(2): 250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.008

    [12]

    ISOMOTO H, YAMAGUCHI N, NAKAYAMA T, et al. Management of esophageal stricture after complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2011, 11: 46. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-46

    [13]

    KATADA C, MUTO M, MANABE T, et al. Esophageal Stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57(2): 165-169. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.73

    [14]

    MIZUTA H, NISHIMORI I, KURATANI Y, et al. Predictive factors for esophageal Stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2009, 22(7): 626-631. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00954.x

    [15]

    HONDA M, NAKAMURA T, HORI Y, et al. Process of healing of mucosal defects in the esophagus after endoscopic mucosal resection: histological evaluation in a dog model[J]. Endoscopy, 2010, 42(12): 1092-1095. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255741

    [16] 张震, 张轶群, 周平红, 等. 内镜下放射状切开治疗食管吻合口良性狭窄的临床初探[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016, 33(4): 208-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWXH201905012.htm
  • 期刊类型引用(23)

    1. 朱艳玲,哈力旦·加马力丁,刘芳,米拉·巴依肯,汪露. 凝血指标联合血栓弹力图指标对缺血性脑卒中患者复发的预测价值研究. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志. 2023(04): 35-39 . 百度学术
    2. 陈元元. 急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图与血小板聚集率的相关性分析. 黑龙江医药科学. 2023(02): 169-170 . 百度学术
    3. 胡占斌,曹丹丹,李豪威. miR-126、Lp-PLA2和TNF-α在急性脑梗死中的表达及临床意义. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2022(07): 1233-1236+1241 . 百度学术
    4. 徐宗琴,廖海平. 急性脑梗死患者溶栓治疗中TEG动态监测与D-二聚体、血小板聚集率及脂蛋白a的相关性分析. 海军医学杂志. 2022(05): 549-552 . 百度学术
    5. 臧立会,任爱兵,贾沛哲,戴芳,王英,解旭东,陈国杰,张晓慧,李岩异. 轻中度急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图参数与血液高凝状态的关系及对早期神经功能恶化的预测价值. 临床误诊误治. 2022(07): 97-101 . 百度学术
    6. 陈前萍,匡新. 常规凝血检测与血栓弹力图评价急性脑梗死患者近期预后的价值. 实用临床医药杂志. 2021(02): 36-39 . 本站查看
    7. 王岳,杨超,杜彬,段光华,杜爱翠,赵丽霞,王瑜,董海蛟,邵雯,任召祺. 血栓弹力图评价阿司匹林 氯吡格雷及其联合应用抗血小板药物治疗急性脑梗死有效性及安全性. 中国药物与临床. 2021(02): 209-212 . 百度学术
    8. 周红,覃少东,黄澄. 血栓弹力图在急性脑梗死患者诊疗中的应用进展. 微量元素与健康研究. 2021(01): 68-70 . 百度学术
    9. 黄越,苏平,谢代刚. 血栓弹力图、凝血功能、D-二聚体、血小板聚集、同型半胱氨酸检测对急性脑卒中患者诊治价值. 中国医药科学. 2021(13): 210-213 . 百度学术
    10. 靳舒贵. 奥扎格雷钠联合降栓酶对急性脑血栓患者凝血功能的影响. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(14): 102-103+109 . 百度学术
    11. 卢春生,曹文平,陈新春,高以娟,邬军. 血栓弹力图评价急性脑梗死患者应用阿司匹林及氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗的效果. 中国实用医药. 2021(27): 93-96 . 百度学术
    12. 刘芳龙. 血栓弹力图在急性脑梗死患者出血性转化评估中的应用. 实用医技杂志. 2021(11): 1331-1333+1387 . 百度学术
    13. 肖明明,李子斌. 丹参川芎嗪注射液静脉滴注治疗急性期脑血栓的临床效果分析. 黑龙江中医药. 2020(01): 69-70 . 百度学术
    14. 李子斌,肖明明. 尿激酶溶栓在脑血栓患者中的应用及预后效果评估. 黑龙江中医药. 2020(02): 148-149 . 百度学术
    15. 张筠. 急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图与凝血功能检查的相关性分析. 中外医学研究. 2020(19): 68-70 . 百度学术
    16. 白重阳,董轲. 急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图与凝血功能的关系. 海南医学. 2020(15): 1923-1926 . 百度学术
    17. 李莉. 凝血指标检测在急性进展性脑梗死中的应用价值. 中外医学研究. 2020(31): 69-70 . 百度学术
    18. 杨祖伟,涂文瑞,林松. 急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图与凝血功能相关性分析. 中外医学研究. 2020(35): 65-67 . 百度学术
    19. 郭翀. 凝血功能检测在脑血栓预防中的临床价值分析. 现代诊断与治疗. 2020(22): 3636-3637 . 百度学术
    20. 张捷,魏恩钲,邓超. 重复捐献机采血小板对献血者血小板功能及凝血功能的影响. 中国现代医生. 2020(36): 96-98+102 . 百度学术
    21. 郑红丽. TEG参数与短暂性脑缺血发作后进展为脑梗死的相关性. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2019(10): 1239-1240 . 百度学术
    22. 麦剑培,元少鹏,杨露宁. 血栓弹力图在颅脑损伤中的应用. 中国现代药物应用. 2019(19): 50-51 . 百度学术
    23. 王民强,卞祥虎. 急性脑梗死患者血栓弹力图与凝血功能的关系分析. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2019(09): 53-54 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(5)

表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  212
  • HTML全文浏览量:  124
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 28
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-07-13

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回