微生态制剂联合膳食纤维对慢性阻塞性肺疾病及肠道菌群和炎症因子的影响

Effects of microecological agents combined with dietary fiber on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intestinal flora and inflammatory factors

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨微生态制剂联合膳食纤维对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床疗效及对患者肠道菌群和炎症因子的影响。方法 选取80例COPD急性加重期患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为膳食纤维组和联合组,每组40例。膳食纤维组采用膳食纤维干预,联合组采用微生态制剂联合膳食纤维干预。比较2组患者的营养素摄入量、体质量指数(BMI)、营养指标白蛋白(ALB)、血红蛋白(Hb)、前白蛋白(PA)水平、炎症相关指标降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平、肠黏膜屏障功能二胺氧化酶(DAO)、肠型脂肪酸结合蛋白(I-FABP)、D-乳酸(D-LA)以及肠道细菌数量。结果 干预后, 2组患者BMI及总热量、脂肪、碳水化合物、蛋白质摄入量均高于干预前,且联合组高于膳食纤维组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后, 2组患者ALB、Hb、PA水平均高于干预前,且联合组高于膳食纤维组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后, 2组患者PCT、CRP、TNF-α水平均低于干预前,且联合组低于膳食纤维组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后, 2组患者D-LA水平高于干预前, DAO、I-FABP水平低于干预前,且联合组D-LA水平高于膳食纤维组, DAO、I-FABP水平低于膳食纤维组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 干预后,联合组大肠埃希菌、肠球菌数量少于膳食纤维组,乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌、拟杆菌数量多于膳食纤维组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组不良反应总发生率及干预后水肿情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 微生态制剂联合膳食纤维治疗COPD效果显著,能够改善患者肠道微生物群稳态,减轻炎症反应,并改善营养状况。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of microecological agents combined with dietary fiber in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its impacts on intestinal flora and inflammatory factors in patients. Methods A total of 80 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were enrolled and randomly divided into dietary fiber group and combination group, with 40 patients in each group. The dietary fiber group received dietary fiber intervention, while the combination group received microecological agents combined with dietary fiber intervention. Nutrient intake, body mass index (BMI), nutritional indicators albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb), prealbumin (PA), inflammatory markersprocalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), intestinal mucosal barrier function diamine oxidase (DAO), intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), D-lactic acid (D-LA), and intestinal bacterial counts were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, BMI and total calorie, intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein were higher in both groups compared with before intervention, and were higher in the combination group than in the dietary fiber group (P<0.05). After intervention, ALB, Hb, and PA levels were higher in both groups compared with before intervention, and were higher in the combination group than in the dietary fiber group (P<0.05). After intervention, PCT, CRP, and TNF-α levels were lower in both groups compared with before intervention, and were lower in the combination group than in the dietary fiber group (P<0.05). After intervention,D-LA levels were higher, and the DAO and I-FABP levels were lower in both groups compared with before intervention(P<0.05). D-LA levels were higher, while DAO and I-FABP levels were lower in the combination group compared with the dietary fiber group (P<0.05). After intervention, the number of Escherichia coli and Enterococci were lower in the combination group than in the dietary fiber group, while the number of Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, and Bacteroides were higher (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the total incidence of adverse reactions or edema status after intervention between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Microecological agents combined with dietary fiber exhibit significant efficacy in the treatment of COPD, which can stabilize the intestinal microbial community, reduce inflammatory responses, and improve nutritional status.

     

/

返回文章
返回