Citation: | HUANG Zhifei, ZHU Youling, DONG Bin, ZHAI Dengyue, XU Qiaoqiao. Evaluation of carotid geometry of the internal carotid artery atheromatous plaque by head and neck CT angiography imaging[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(13): 65-70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230458 |
To investigate the relationship between different carotid geometry and the formation of atherosclerotic plaque in the initial part of internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with ischemic stroke based on CT angiography (CTA) of head and neck.
Data of patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke and who completed head and neck CTA were retrospectively collected. Ninety-two patients with atherosclerotic plaques at the beginning of unilateral ICA were included in the plaque group, and 30 patients with bilateral normal ICA with similar demographic variables were selected as the control group. At the same time, unilateral ICA initiation atherosclerotic plaque were divided into plaque side and non-plaque side. The differences of carotid artery geometry between the two groups and in the plaque and non-plaque sides were compared.
The geometric parameters of carotid artery, such as internal carotid artery angle, carotid artery dilation and ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) diameter ratio in the plaque group showed significant difference compared with those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the non-plaque side, the internal carotid artery angle on the plaque side was significantly larger, carotid artery dilation was significantly higher, and ICA/CCA diameter ratio was significantly lower (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis results showed that larger internal carotid artery angle and carotid artery dilatation and lower ICA/CCA diameter ratio were associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation at ICA initiation.
The geometric features of carotid artery are different among different individuals. In patients with mild ICA atherosclerotic lesions, larger internal carotid artery angle, carotid artery dilation and smaller ICA/CCA diameter ratio are independent risk factors for atherosclerotic plaque formation at the initiation of ICA.
[1] |
康钦, 王豪, 宋嫣, 等. 彩色多普勒超声检测颈动脉内中膜厚度、斑块及颈动脉狭窄对缺血性脑卒中的诊断价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(14): 43-45. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201914011
|
[2] |
APAYDIN M, CETINOGLU K. Carotid angle in young stroke[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 70: 10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.020
|
[3] |
刘伊桐, 黄燕琪, 李明利, 等. 颈动脉几何形态: 60岁及以下无高危因素人群颅内动脉粥样硬化的潜在预测指标[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(9): 925-931. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2022.09.003
|
[4] |
江培榕, 薛蕴菁, 赵锡海, 等. 高分辨率MRI评估早期颈动脉粥样硬化患者双侧颈动脉分叉几何形态差异[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2020, 36(12): 1799-1803. doi: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2020.12.009
|
[5] |
STRECKER C, KRAFFT A J, KAUFHOLD L, et al. Carotid geometry and wall shear stress independently predict increased wall thickness-a longitudinal 3D MRI study in high-risk patients[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8: 723860. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.723860
|
[6] |
杨雪, 胡勇, 向波, 等. CTA探讨颈动脉几何形态与粥样硬化斑块的关系[J]. 西部医学, 2019, 31(8): 1273-1277, 1282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2019.08.028
|
[7] |
JIANG P R, CHEN Z S, HIPPE D S, et al. Association between carotid bifurcation geometry and atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: a Chinese atherosclerosis risk evaluation study[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2020, 40(5): 1383-1391. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313830
|
[8] |
KWON W, KIM Y, KIM J, et al. Bilateral carotid artery geometry using magnetic resonance angiography: a 10-year longitudinal single center study[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 4932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09062-7
|
[9] |
STULA I, KOJUNDZIC S L, GUIC M M, et al. Carotid artery stenosis in correlation with neck and carotid artery anatomy[J]. Vascular, 2022, 30(3): 524-531. doi: 10.1177/17085381211018603
|
[10] |
THOMAS J B, ANTIGA L, CHE S L, et al. Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults: implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis[J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(11): 2450-2456. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185679.62634.0a
|
[11] |
BIJARI P B, ANTIGA L, GALLO D, et al. Improved prediction of disturbed flow via hemodynamically-inspired geometric variables[J]. J Biomech, 2012, 45(9): 1632-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.030
|
[12] |
PHAN T G, BEARE R J, JOLLEY D, et al. Carotid artery anatomy and geometry as risk factors for carotid atherosclerotic disease[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(6): 1596-1601. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645499
|
[13] |
MÜLLER M D, AHLHELM F J, VON HESSLING A, et al. Vascular anatomy predicts the risk of cerebral ischemia in patients randomized to carotid stenting versus endarterectomy[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(5): 1285-1292. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014612
|
[14] |
DOMANIN M, GALLO D, VERGARA C, et al. Prediction of long term restenosis risk after surgery in the carotid bifurcation by hemodynamic and geometric analysis[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2019, 47(4): 1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8
|
[15] |
NGUYEN K T, CLARK C D, CHANCELLOR T J, et al. Carotid geometry effects on blood flow and on risk for vascular disease[J]. J Biomech, 2008, 41(1): 11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.08.012
|
[16] |
DEL BRUTTO V J, DONG C H, CULLISON K, et al. Internal carotid artery angle variations are poorly explained by vascular risk factors: the northern Manhattan study[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31(8): 106540. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106540
|
[17] |
ZHANG B, GU J Y, QIAN M, et al. Correlation between quantitative analysis of wall shear stress and intima-media thickness in atherosclerosis development in carotid arteries[J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2017, 16(1): 137. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0425-9
|
[18] |
SHAABAN A M, DUERINCKX A J. Wall shear stress and early atherosclerosis: a review[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 174(6): 1657-1665. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741657
|
[19] |
YAO X K, DAI Z Z, ZHANG X, et al. Carotid geometry as a predictor of In-stent neointimal hyperplasia-A computational fluid dynamics study[J]. Circ J, 2019, 83(7): 1472-1479. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1152
|
[20] |
HUANG X, YIN X P, XU Y J, et al. Morphometric and hemodynamic analysis of atherosclerotic progression in human carotid artery bifurcations[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2016, 310(5): H639-H647. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00464.2015
|
[21] |
LEE S W, ANTIGA L, SPENCE J D, et al. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow[J]. Stroke, 2008, 39(8): 2341-2347. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510644
|
[22] |
BIJARI P B, WASSERMAN B A, STEINMAN D A. Carotid bifurcation geometry is an independent predictor of early wall thickening at the carotid bulb[J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(2): 473-478.
|