ZHU Hailong, ZHANG Xuan. Evaluation on therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for benign breast tumors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 64-66, 70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913018
Citation: ZHU Hailong, ZHANG Xuan. Evaluation on therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for benign breast tumors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 64-66, 70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913018

Evaluation on therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for benign breast tumors

More Information
  • Received Date: May 09, 2019
  • Accepted Date: June 01, 2019
  • Available Online: February 23, 2021
  • Published Date: July 14, 2019
  •   Objective  To investigate the surgical and aesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for benign breast tumors.
      Methods  A total of 80 patients with benign breast tumors admitted to our hospital underwent excision surgeries. According to the principle of random allocation and patients' willingness, they were divided into two groups. The traditional group(n=38) was given traditional resection surgery, and minimally invasive surgery group(n=42) were treated by ultrasound-guided minimally invasive rotary excision. The clinical indicators, VAS scores, incidence of complications and aesthetic effect of the two groups were compared. The recurrence condition of the two groups was compared after 1 year follow-up.
      Results  The operation time, incision healing time was earlier, bleeding volume, visual analogue pain (VAS) score was less and scar length was shorter in minimally invasive surgery group compared to traditional group (P < 0.01); the complication rate of minimally invasive surgery group was 9.52%, which was lower than 28.95% of the traditional group, and the aesthetic effect rate was 95.24%, which was higher than 76.32% of traditional group(P < 0.05). There was one recurrence case in the traditional group and no recurrence case in the minimally invasive group. No significant difference in one-year recurrence rate between the two groups was seen(P>0.05).
      Conclusion  Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of benign breast tumors not only has the advantages of less complications and trauma, but also has better aesthetic effect after operation.
  • [1]
    吴俊彪. 乳腺良性肿瘤82例诊治体会[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(8): 970-971. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YIYA201608041.htm
    [2]
    Tiffany Riley. Benign Breast Disease[J]. Physician Assistant Clinics, 2018, 3(3): 363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cpha.2018.02.005
    [3]
    姚慧韬, 范庆浩, 赵涵. 乳腺良性肿瘤应用单人操作麦默通旋切系统治疗疗效分析[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志, 2017, 11(2): 127-130. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6090.2017.02.010
    [4]
    孔蓉, 吴鹏西, 陈宏伟, 等. 空芯针活检提示乳腺良性乳头状瘤术后升级为恶性的超声及临床特征[J]. 生物医学工程与临床, 2017, 21(5): 507-511. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGLC201705011.htm
    [5]
    朱婧, 朱大江, 范旭龙, 等. 乳腺良性叶状肿瘤复发相关危险因素及麦默通手术的可行性[J]. 分子影像学杂志, 2017, 40(4): 449-452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4500.2017.04.16
    [6]
    林伟, 周余旺, 柯飞. 超声引导下空芯针活检对乳腺肿物良恶性的鉴别价值[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2016, 21(6): 33-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJCW201606012.htm
    [7]
    林力生, 李双齐, 吴丽婷. 微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤患者的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2017, 32(1): 140-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2017.01.044
    [8]
    李鑫, 骆成玉, 崔智淼, 等. 超声引导下真空辅助微创旋切系统治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床研究[J]. 北京医学, 2017, 39(1): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJYX201701017.htm
    [9]
    耿金秀, 刘新梅, 王绪麟, 等. 高频彩超下乳腺肿块微创旋切术对术后瘢痕长度及并发症发生率的影响[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2018, 33(1): 106-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYBF201801057.htm
    [10]
    张麦玲, 张宛越, 李聪彦. 麦默通微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的围手术期整体护理[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(8): 100-102, 109. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201708030
    [11]
    康伟明, 薛毅. 传统手术与微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床对比分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(S3): 145-146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SANE2017S3149.htm
    [12]
    倪道勇, 朱建东, 卓文方. 超声引导下麦默通微创旋切手术治疗乳腺良性肿块的效果观察[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2018, 25(S1): 63-63, 65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL2018S1034.htm
  • Related Articles

    [1]GUO Sijin, YAN Changjiao, WANG Yang, CAO Xiaohua, WANG Ting. Establishment and application of artificial intelligence voice follow-up system for differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(16): 1-4, 9. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241127
    [2]YANG Yichen, ZOU Cao. Radiofrequency catheter ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in long-term follow up results[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(12): 10-13. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220369
    [3]LI Yanhua, PU Shijun, SUI Mingxing, DUAN Yazhe, LU Xiaoying. Effect of full-time follow-up on quality of life in recipients with transplantation of donated kidney[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(5): 58-61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213474
    [4]XUAN Dongping, QIAO Jin, ZHAO Yan, CHEN Xia. Influence of medication education combined with information follow-up on therapeutic effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in clinic[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(16): 81-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212369
    [5]HUANG Zhonghua. Effects evaluation of continuous follow-up in dry weight control of patients with long-term hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (10): 35-38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201610012
    [6]HOU Aihong. Effect of prenatal health follow-up on the delivery skills and delivery mode of primiparas[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (8): 121-123. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201608037
    [7]WANG Xiaojuan, LIU Xiaomei, HAN Yufeng, LI Chen, WEI Yong, ZHANG Lili. The effect of WeChat platform in the follow-up intervention for premature infants[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (4): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201604040
    [8]ZHANG Fang, ZHANG Yaning, ZHAO Hua. Effect of WeChat follow up outside the hospital on self-careability of rectal cancer patients with rectostomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (4): 107-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201604033
    [9]XU Jun, WANG Fang. Influence of nursing intervention during follow-up on symptoms and quality of life in non-hospitalized children with asthma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (12): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201512032
    [10]ZHANG Huifang, LIU Meng. Telephone follow-up and health guidance for discharged puerperas with caesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (10): 98-100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201310036
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(45)

    1. 张辅满,林桦,缪卡莉,张哲,林靖,钟永鸣. 加置橡皮引流对促进肉芽肿性乳腺炎微创旋切术后康复的观察. 甘肃医药. 2024(02): 134-136 .
    2. 吴昊,王婷婷,宁伟,石亚楠,海艺贝. 超声下真空辅助微创旋切用于乳腺良性肿瘤的效果. 黑龙江医药科学. 2024(05): 146-148+152 .
    3. 钱敏,陈静,俞超,楼晨,吕锦恒. 乳腺循经温通技术治疗乳腺增生的疗效分析. 中国处方药. 2024(11): 165-167 .
    4. 周利人. 超声辅助麦默通乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿瘤患者手术相关指标及炎症因子的影响. 中国医学创新. 2023(07): 42-46 .
    5. 周瑶,肖尾丰,彭青群. 超声定位下微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床疗效及预后分析. 江西医药. 2023(03): 345-346+373 .
    6. 张忠玲,熊辉. 乳腺良性叶状肿瘤真空辅助旋切与开放手术对术后局部复发的影响. 医学信息. 2023(12): 133-135+139 .
    7. 常莹,郭卫宾,王江芬. 超声引导下乳腺微创旋切术联合循证护理对乳腺癌患者的影响. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2023(20): 109-112 .
    8. 杜京丽,黄嘉杰,洪亮,郑茂煌,傅志荣. 超声引导下微波消融与微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果及安全性. 中外医学研究. 2023(34): 119-122 .
    9. 郭冀鲁,李远,李芳,韩臻,刘学智,牛俊波. 超声辅助乳腺微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果及对应激反应的影响. 中国医学创新. 2023(35): 1-5 .
    10. 杜璐迪,刘翔,王莉娟,戴力. 乳管镜联合B超引导下微创旋切术治疗乳腺导管内良性肿瘤的疗效和安全性. 中国妇幼保健. 2022(07): 1341-1343 .
    11. 陈立丰. 乳腺良性肿瘤行微创旋切术与传统开刀术治疗的临床效果对比. 基层医学论坛. 2022(19): 139-141 .
    12. 吴琼. 乳腺外科微创手术患者手术室的护理配合及预后分析. 基层医学论坛. 2022(21): 16-18+40 .
    13. 候玉龙. 超声引导下麦默通微创旋切术应用于乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效分析及其疼痛、并发症情况观察. 吉林医学. 2022(07): 1948-1951 .
    14. 袁军华,曹娟,任超,王隽. 超声引导下微创旋切术治疗乳腺多发性肿块的效果及其对术后疼痛与应激反应的影响. 中外医学研究. 2022(18): 153-156 .
    15. 刘国庆. 超声引导下乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺肿块患者的疗效影响分析. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(13): 106-108 .
    16. 张健瑀,盛燕红,王苗锋. 超声引导微创旋切术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的疗效研究. 浙江创伤外科. 2022(05): 907-908 .
    17. 王明佳,李晓旭,宋德霸,张晓剑. Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效分析. 上海医药. 2022(23): 33-36 .
    18. 胡晨波. 超声引导下微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿块患者围手术期指标及并发症的影响. 中国医学创新. 2022(35): 65-68 .
    19. 干江,王俊,李欢欢,陈燕燕. 乳癖祛瘀汤对乳腺结节旋切术后患者的影响. 光明中医. 2022(21): 3856-3858 .
    20. 宋磊. 乳腺微创旋切术在乳房良性肿瘤诊疗中的应用效果. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(23): 144-146 .
    21. 洪云峰,谢毅坚,江文波. 超声引导下真空辅助旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果. 中外医学研究. 2022(35): 110-114 .
    22. 袁月欢,唐诗,李玉娟,杨波. 超声引导下微创旋切治疗乳腺良性肿瘤临床效果. 中国城乡企业卫生. 2021(01): 138-140 .
    23. 王珂. 全面护理干预策略在乳腺良性肿瘤患者围手术期中的应用. 黑龙江医药. 2021(01): 236-238 .
    24. 刘金平,李祥平,姚振宏. 乳腺良性肿瘤行超声引导下微创旋切术治疗的手术和美观效果观察. 基层医学论坛. 2021(05): 637-639 .
    25. 钱桂荣,孙菲,孙海波. 乳腺良性肿瘤患者超声引导下微创旋切术治疗的有效性及对患者并发症发生的影响. 影像研究与医学应用. 2021(08): 165-166 .
    26. 付飞国,王忆丽,雷秋模,李梦辉. 超声引导小切口微创旋切术应用于浆细胞性乳腺炎的效果研究. 基层医学论坛. 2021(22): 3119-3121 .
    27. 余汉辉,徐伟宏,梅锋,邱凌. 超声引导下麦默通乳腺微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果对比. 中国实用医药. 2021(21): 79-81 .
    28. 黄小涛,顾泽苗. 乳腺旋切微创术治疗多发性乳腺纤维瘤患者的疗效及美容效果分析. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(15): 75-76 .
    29. 王恩远. 超声引导真空辅助旋切术治疗乳腺良性占位病变的近期效果. 河南外科学杂志. 2021(05): 79-81 .
    30. 金俊超,郑依童,刘伟迪. 微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床疗效、安全性及对患者抑郁、焦虑情绪的影响. 国际精神病学杂志. 2021(05): 865-868 .
    31. 徐斌,卫利民,刘永萱,梁仁杰. 安珂真空辅助微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效. 国际医药卫生导报. 2021(20): 3216-3219 .
    32. 何鹏,李永飞,吴意赟,任晓梅,卞卫和,姚昶. 超声引导下真空辅助旋切术与开放切除术治疗合并钙化灶乳腺肿块的效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2021(22): 13-16 . 本站查看
    33. 张立光. 放射状切口与乳晕缘小切口切除术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的对比. 系统医学. 2021(20): 120-124 .
    34. 韦杰峰. 超声引导下麦默通乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿瘤患者术后疗效影响观察. 影像研究与医学应用. 2021(23): 207-208+211 .
    35. 林庆军,杜丽,林燕晖,林燕纯,陈业晞. 乳腺表浅良性肿物应用水平式乳腺旋切切除效果分析. 中国现代医生. 2021(35): 58-61 .
    36. 姚晓波. 安珂真空辅助微创旋切术和传统开放式手术治疗200例乳腺肿瘤的效果比较. 四川解剖学杂志. 2020(01): 79-80 .
    37. 胡亚男,张英霞. 应用超声技术评估ATEC系统旋切乳腺良性肿块的研究. 影像研究与医学应用. 2020(04): 92-93 .
    38. 陈露文,叶永强. B超定位下的微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块的临床疗效观察. 中国医学创新. 2020(25): 132-135 .
    39. 袁月欢,唐诗,李玉娟,杨波,陈媛媛,吴玲,温珮琦,邓杰华. 真空辅助旋切术在乳腺良性肿物患者中的价值及对复发率的影响. 中外医学研究. 2020(24): 25-27 .
    40. 付修林,杨荣. 真空辅助旋切术与传统乳腺肿物切除术在乳腺良性肿瘤治疗中的效果比较. 中国全科医学. 2020(S1): 163-165 .
    41. 张学东. 超声下微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2020(12): 44-45+59 .
    42. 戴军,杨旭辉,吴晓,周志林,梅勇. 微创旋切术用于老年乳腺良性肿块患者对手术指标、应激反应和免疫功能的影响. 现代生物医学进展. 2020(21): 4051-4054 .
    43. 黄大翠,杨向贵,夏林玉. 安珂微创旋切系统在乳腺良性肿块切除中的应用及预后影响分析. 中国美容医学. 2020(12): 72-75 .
    44. 温冰馨,王斌. 超声引导下乳腺良性病灶微创旋切术的临床效果. 中国当代医药. 2020(32): 73-75 .
    45. 郑育民,李成宜. 乳腺微创旋切治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎的临床观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2020(17): 131-133 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (278) PDF downloads (9) Cited by(45)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return