Advance Search
LI Hongzhi, WANG Honggang. Clinical effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in treatment of patients with medium to advanced rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(23): 51-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201923015
Citation: LI Hongzhi, WANG Honggang. Clinical effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in treatment of patients with medium to advanced rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(23): 51-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201923015
shu

Clinical effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in treatment of patients with medium to advanced rectal cancer

  • 1.

    Department of Oncology, Taizhou People′s Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300

  • 2.

    Department of Intestinal Surgery, Taizhou People′s Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300

More Information
  • Received Date: October 11, 2019
  • Available Online: February 28, 2021
  • Published Date: December 14, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the clinical effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in treatment of patients with medium to advanced rectal cancer.
      Methods  Seventy patients with medium to advanced rectal cancer were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 cases in each group. The control group was treated with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy by capecitabine, and the observation group received oxaliplatin plus capecitabine for preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Both groups were followed up for 12 months, and the clinical effects were observed in two groups.
      Results  The total effective rate was 82.86% in the observation group, which was significantly higher than 57.14% in the control group (P < 0.05). The local recurrence rate within 1 year after operation in the observation group was 20.00%, which was significantly lower than 42.86% in the control group (P < 0.05). The survival rate was 82.86% in the observation group, which was significantly higher than 60.00% in the control group (P < 0.05). In the comparison of quality of life, the scores of the four dimensions such as physiological, psychological, social and environmental abilities in the observation group were significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The distant metastasis rate of the observation group and the control group within 1 year was 14.29% and 31.43%, respectively (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine is effective in the treatment of medium to advanced rectal cancer, which can significantly reduce the local recurrence rate and improve the quality of life.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (16)
  • [1]
    林恒娜, 顾秀瑛, 张思维, 等. 全球恶性肿瘤发病年龄分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2018, 40(7): 543-549. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.07.012
    [2]
    袁建伟, 王保振, 耿北, 等. 经肛内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的术后肿瘤学效果及其影响因素[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2018, 33(6): 982-984, 988. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2018.06.034
    [3]
    刘启志, 楼征, 高显华, 等. 直肠癌患者术后生存与复发的临床病理因素探讨[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2017, 32(1): 5-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2017.01.003
    [4]
    Sasaki T, Ito Y, Ohue M, et al. Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy After Local Resection for High-Risk T1 to T2 Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Single-Arm, Multi-Institutional, Phase Ⅱ Clinical Trial[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2017, 60(9): 914-921. http://smartsearch.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=3ed1818fa8e6821605b6f93349343e48
    [5]
    Hida K, Okamura R, Park S Y, et al. A New Prediction Model for Local Recurrence After Curative Rectal Cancer Surgery: evelopment and Validation as an Asian Collaborative Study[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2017, 60(11): 1168-1174.
    [6]
    Gollins S, West N, Sebag-Montefiore D, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: Significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations[J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 117(9): 1286-1294. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.294
    [7]
    Nishimura J, Hasegawa J, Kato T, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as perioperative therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2018, 82(5): 13-17. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419430652
    [8]
    刘荫华, 徐玲. 第七版《AJCC肿瘤分期手册》结直肠癌内容的更新与解读[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2010, 13(8): 629-631. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2010.08.028
    [9]
    Mch R A S, Swaminathan R, Mch A S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Long‐term outcomes of a propensity score matched study[J]. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 117(3): 26-30. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29044538
    [10]
    禹汇川, 骆衍新, 王小琳, 等. 直肠癌根治术后的复发类型对复发后远期生存的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(8): 625-628. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.08.009
    [11]
    朱立波, 李雪, 王荣, 等. 基于复发类型的Cox风险模型评估直肠癌根治术后复发患者预后的价值[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2018, 23(4): 476-478. . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2018.04.013
    [12]
    Jang J K, Lee J L, Park S H, et al. Magnetic resonance tumour regression grade and pathological correlates in patients with rectal cancer. [J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2018, 105(12): 1671-1679. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10898
    [13]
    李雨鑫, 王文玲, 董洪敏, 等. 局部进展期直肠癌根治术后卡培他滨+奥沙利铂同步放化疗的临床研究[J]. 贵州医药, 2017, 41(6): 647-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2017.06.041
    [14]
    Jootun N, Evans T, Mak J, et al. Comparing pathological complete response rate using oral capecitabine versus infusional 5-fluorouracil with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2018, 88(1/2): 62-65. doi: 10.1111/ans.14192/full
    [15]
    Jootun N, Evans T, Mak J, et al. Comparing pathological complete response rate using oral capecitabine versus infusional 5-fluorouracil with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment[J]. Anz Journal of Surgery, 2017, 88(1/2): 14-18. doi: 10.1111/ans.14192/full
    [16]
    Lee S Y, Chang H K, Kim Y J, et al. Prognostic significance of the distribution of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation[J]. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 117(3): 23-25. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/320801246_Prognostic_significance_of_the_distribution_of_lymph_node_metastasis_in_rectal_cancer_after_neoadjuvant_chemoradiation
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]GUO Sijin, YAN Changjiao, WANG Yang, CAO Xiaohua, WANG Ting. Establishment and application of artificial intelligence voice follow-up system for differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(16): 1-4, 9. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241127
    [2]YANG Yichen, ZOU Cao. Radiofrequency catheter ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in long-term follow up results[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(12): 10-13. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220369
    [3]LI Yanhua, PU Shijun, SUI Mingxing, DUAN Yazhe, LU Xiaoying. Effect of full-time follow-up on quality of life in recipients with transplantation of donated kidney[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(5): 58-61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213474
    [4]XUAN Dongping, QIAO Jin, ZHAO Yan, CHEN Xia. Influence of medication education combined with information follow-up on therapeutic effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in clinic[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(16): 81-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212369
    [5]HUANG Zhonghua. Effects evaluation of continuous follow-up in dry weight control of patients with long-term hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (10): 35-38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201610012
    [6]HOU Aihong. Effect of prenatal health follow-up on the delivery skills and delivery mode of primiparas[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (8): 121-123. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201608037
    [7]WANG Xiaojuan, LIU Xiaomei, HAN Yufeng, LI Chen, WEI Yong, ZHANG Lili. The effect of WeChat platform in the follow-up intervention for premature infants[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (4): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201604040
    [8]ZHANG Fang, ZHANG Yaning, ZHAO Hua. Effect of WeChat follow up outside the hospital on self-careability of rectal cancer patients with rectostomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (4): 107-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201604033
    [9]XU Jun, WANG Fang. Influence of nursing intervention during follow-up on symptoms and quality of life in non-hospitalized children with asthma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (12): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201512032
    [10]ZHANG Huifang, LIU Meng. Telephone follow-up and health guidance for discharged puerperas with caesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (10): 98-100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201310036

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(45)

    1. 张辅满，林桦，缪卡莉，张哲，林靖，钟永鸣. 加置橡皮引流对促进肉芽肿性乳腺炎微创旋切术后康复的观察. 甘肃医药. 2024(02): 134-136 .
    2. 吴昊，王婷婷，宁伟，石亚楠，海艺贝. 超声下真空辅助微创旋切用于乳腺良性肿瘤的效果. 黑龙江医药科学. 2024(05): 146-148+152 .
    3. 钱敏，陈静，俞超，楼晨，吕锦恒. 乳腺循经温通技术治疗乳腺增生的疗效分析. 中国处方药. 2024(11): 165-167 .
    4. 周利人. 超声辅助麦默通乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿瘤患者手术相关指标及炎症因子的影响. 中国医学创新. 2023(07): 42-46 .
    5. 周瑶，肖尾丰，彭青群. 超声定位下微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床疗效及预后分析. 江西医药. 2023(03): 345-346+373 .
    6. 张忠玲，熊辉. 乳腺良性叶状肿瘤真空辅助旋切与开放手术对术后局部复发的影响. 医学信息. 2023(12): 133-135+139 .
    7. 常莹，郭卫宾，王江芬. 超声引导下乳腺微创旋切术联合循证护理对乳腺癌患者的影响. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2023(20): 109-112 .
    8. 杜京丽，黄嘉杰，洪亮，郑茂煌，傅志荣. 超声引导下微波消融与微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果及安全性. 中外医学研究. 2023(34): 119-122 .
    9. 郭冀鲁，李远，李芳，韩臻，刘学智，牛俊波. 超声辅助乳腺微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果及对应激反应的影响. 中国医学创新. 2023(35): 1-5 .
    10. 杜璐迪，刘翔，王莉娟，戴力. 乳管镜联合B超引导下微创旋切术治疗乳腺导管内良性肿瘤的疗效和安全性. 中国妇幼保健. 2022(07): 1341-1343 .
    11. 陈立丰. 乳腺良性肿瘤行微创旋切术与传统开刀术治疗的临床效果对比. 基层医学论坛. 2022(19): 139-141 .
    12. 吴琼. 乳腺外科微创手术患者手术室的护理配合及预后分析. 基层医学论坛. 2022(21): 16-18+40 .
    13. 候玉龙. 超声引导下麦默通微创旋切术应用于乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效分析及其疼痛、并发症情况观察. 吉林医学. 2022(07): 1948-1951 .
    14. 袁军华，曹娟，任超，王隽. 超声引导下微创旋切术治疗乳腺多发性肿块的效果及其对术后疼痛与应激反应的影响. 中外医学研究. 2022(18): 153-156 .
    15. 刘国庆. 超声引导下乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺肿块患者的疗效影响分析. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(13): 106-108 .
    16. 张健瑀，盛燕红，王苗锋. 超声引导微创旋切术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的疗效研究. 浙江创伤外科. 2022(05): 907-908 .
    17. 王明佳，李晓旭，宋德霸，张晓剑. Mammotome微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效分析. 上海医药. 2022(23): 33-36 .
    18. 胡晨波. 超声引导下微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿块患者围手术期指标及并发症的影响. 中国医学创新. 2022(35): 65-68 .
    19. 干江，王俊，李欢欢，陈燕燕. 乳癖祛瘀汤对乳腺结节旋切术后患者的影响. 光明中医. 2022(21): 3856-3858 .
    20. 宋磊. 乳腺微创旋切术在乳房良性肿瘤诊疗中的应用效果. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(23): 144-146 .
    21. 洪云峰，谢毅坚，江文波. 超声引导下真空辅助旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果. 中外医学研究. 2022(35): 110-114 .
    22. 袁月欢，唐诗，李玉娟，杨波. 超声引导下微创旋切治疗乳腺良性肿瘤临床效果. 中国城乡企业卫生. 2021(01): 138-140 .
    23. 王珂. 全面护理干预策略在乳腺良性肿瘤患者围手术期中的应用. 黑龙江医药. 2021(01): 236-238 .
    24. 刘金平，李祥平，姚振宏. 乳腺良性肿瘤行超声引导下微创旋切术治疗的手术和美观效果观察. 基层医学论坛. 2021(05): 637-639 .
    25. 钱桂荣，孙菲，孙海波. 乳腺良性肿瘤患者超声引导下微创旋切术治疗的有效性及对患者并发症发生的影响. 影像研究与医学应用. 2021(08): 165-166 .
    26. 付飞国，王忆丽，雷秋模，李梦辉. 超声引导小切口微创旋切术应用于浆细胞性乳腺炎的效果研究. 基层医学论坛. 2021(22): 3119-3121 .
    27. 余汉辉，徐伟宏，梅锋，邱凌. 超声引导下麦默通乳腺微创旋切术与传统手术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的效果对比. 中国实用医药. 2021(21): 79-81 .
    28. 黄小涛，顾泽苗. 乳腺旋切微创术治疗多发性乳腺纤维瘤患者的疗效及美容效果分析. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(15): 75-76 .
    29. 王恩远. 超声引导真空辅助旋切术治疗乳腺良性占位病变的近期效果. 河南外科学杂志. 2021(05): 79-81 .
    30. 金俊超，郑依童，刘伟迪. 微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床疗效、安全性及对患者抑郁、焦虑情绪的影响. 国际精神病学杂志. 2021(05): 865-868 .
    31. 徐斌，卫利民，刘永萱，梁仁杰. 安珂真空辅助微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效. 国际医药卫生导报. 2021(20): 3216-3219 .
    32. 何鹏，李永飞，吴意赟，任晓梅，卞卫和，姚昶. 超声引导下真空辅助旋切术与开放切除术治疗合并钙化灶乳腺肿块的效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2021(22): 13-16 . 本站查看
    33. 张立光. 放射状切口与乳晕缘小切口切除术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的对比. 系统医学. 2021(20): 120-124 .
    34. 韦杰峰. 超声引导下麦默通乳腺微创旋切术对乳腺良性肿瘤患者术后疗效影响观察. 影像研究与医学应用. 2021(23): 207-208+211 .
    35. 林庆军，杜丽，林燕晖，林燕纯，陈业晞. 乳腺表浅良性肿物应用水平式乳腺旋切切除效果分析. 中国现代医生. 2021(35): 58-61 .
    36. 姚晓波. 安珂真空辅助微创旋切术和传统开放式手术治疗200例乳腺肿瘤的效果比较. 四川解剖学杂志. 2020(01): 79-80 .
    37. 胡亚男，张英霞. 应用超声技术评估ATEC系统旋切乳腺良性肿块的研究. 影像研究与医学应用. 2020(04): 92-93 .
    38. 陈露文，叶永强. B超定位下的微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿块的临床疗效观察. 中国医学创新. 2020(25): 132-135 .
    39. 袁月欢，唐诗，李玉娟，杨波，陈媛媛，吴玲，温珮琦，邓杰华. 真空辅助旋切术在乳腺良性肿物患者中的价值及对复发率的影响. 中外医学研究. 2020(24): 25-27 .
    40. 付修林，杨荣. 真空辅助旋切术与传统乳腺肿物切除术在乳腺良性肿瘤治疗中的效果比较. 中国全科医学. 2020(S1): 163-165 .
    41. 张学东. 超声下微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的疗效观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2020(12): 44-45+59 .
    42. 戴军，杨旭辉，吴晓，周志林，梅勇. 微创旋切术用于老年乳腺良性肿块患者对手术指标、应激反应和免疫功能的影响. 现代生物医学进展. 2020(21): 4051-4054 .
    43. 黄大翠，杨向贵，夏林玉. 安珂微创旋切系统在乳腺良性肿块切除中的应用及预后影响分析. 中国美容医学. 2020(12): 72-75 .
    44. 温冰馨，王斌. 超声引导下乳腺良性病灶微创旋切术的临床效果. 中国当代医药. 2020(32): 73-75 .
    45. 郑育民，李成宜. 乳腺微创旋切治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎的临床观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2020(17): 131-133 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (202) PDF downloads (5) Cited by(45)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return