Dosimetric differences of different radiation modes based on Monaco in postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

PAN Xiang; YANG Yi; HOU Yu; YUAN Meifang

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20200621

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2021 > 25(1): 1-5. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200621

PAN Xiang, YANG Yi, HOU Yu, YUAN Meifang. Dosimetric differences of different radiation modes based on Monaco in postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(1): 1-5. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200621

Citation:

PDF (667 KB)

Dosimetric differences of different radiation modes based on Monaco in postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Department of Radiotherapy, Tumor Hospital of Yunnan Province, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650118

More Information

Received Date: August 25, 2020
Available Online: January 17, 2021
Published Date: January 14, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of different radiation modes in Monaco planning system on the dosimetry of postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Methods Twelve patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer were selected. The Monaco planning system was used to design single-field and double-arc (1F2A), two-field and double-arc (2F2A), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (dMLC) plans for each patient under the same optimal conditions. The target areas and organ-at-risk dosimetric parameters of the three plans were compared.
Results The target doses of the three plans all met the clinical requirements. In the comparison of the parameters such as radiation dose to 2% of the planned target area (D₂), radiation dose to 98% of the planned target area (D₉₈), radiation dose to 50% of the planned target area (D₅₀), conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI), 1F2A plan was significantly better than 2F2A plan and dMLC plan (P < 0.05). The volumes of left lung exposed to 5 Gy dose (V₅), exposed to 10 Gy dose V₁₀, exposed to 20 Gy dose V₂₀, exposed to 30 Gy dose V₃₀ and mean dose (D_mean) of 2F2A plan were lower than those of 1F2A plan and dMLC plan, and significant between-groups differences were observed in V₅, V₁₀ and D_mean (P < 0.05). Compared with 1F2A plan, V₅, V₁₀ and D_mean of right lung, D_mean of right breast and maximum dose (D_max) of spinal cord in 2F2A plan and dMLC plan were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Results ofV₅ and D_meanof heart, in dMLC plan were significantly lower than those of 1F2A plan and 2F2A plan (P < 0.05). The number of segments in 2F2A plan was significantly lower than that in 1F2A plan and dMLC plan (P < 0.05).
Conclusion All of the three plans can meet the clinical requirements, but the 2F2A plan can reduce the irradiated dose and volume of organs-at-risk. Considering the quality of the plan and the performance efficiency, it is suggested that the volume rotation intensity modulated technique with 2F2A field distribution should be used in postoperative radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	ZHANG P S, HE L Y, SHI F J, et al. Three-dimensional visualization technique in endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and pedicled omentum for immediate breast reconstruction[J]. Surg Oncol, 2019, 28: 103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.11.016
[2]	于雪飞. 乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗进展[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(16): 3-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYY201916002.htm
[3]	严恒琛. 乳腺癌保乳术后瘤床同步加量与序贯加量的剂量学比较[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2016.
[4]	YU C X, TANG G. Intensity-modulated arc therapy: principles, technologies and clinical implementation[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2011, 56(5): R31-R54. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/5/R01
[5]	OTTO K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc[J]. Med Phys, 2008, 35(1): 310-317. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293586
[6]	BEDFORD J L. Treatment planning for volumetric modulated arc therapy[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(11): 5128-5138. doi: 10.1118/1.3240488
[7]	MTRAI Z, UJHELYI M, KOVCS T, et al. Evaluation of a retroglandular oncoplastic technique as a standard level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective clinicopathologic study of 102 patients with breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2019, 19(3): e459-e467. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.02.005
[8]	李聪, 李思涵, 夏兵. 非共面容积旋转调强技术在左侧乳腺癌保乳术后全乳加锁骨区放疗中的剂量学研究[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2020, 37(6): 691-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2020.06.007
[9]	张庆怀, 张彦秋, 杨森, 等. CRT+VMAT技术在左侧乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗中的剂量学研究[J]. 肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 24(5): 518-522. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XHON201805026.htm
[10]	喻洁. IMRT和VMAT放疗技术在需进行内乳淋巴结放疗的乳腺癌改良根治术病人中的剂量学比较[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2019.
[11]	金梦. 乳腺癌精确放射治疗研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2019.
[12]	李金凯, 曹远东, 李彩虹, 等. 容积调强在左侧乳腺癌保乳术后放疗中的应用[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(21): 59-62. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201521016
[13]	郑亚琴, 邢晓汾, 马永强, 等. 快速旋转调强与五野动态调强在乳腺癌保乳术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2013(3): 282-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2013.03.016
[14]	钟胜河, 胡洪波, 黎建绪. 早期乳腺癌保乳术后动态与静态调强放疗技术的剂量学对比分析[J]. 广西医学, 2020, 42(11): 1377-1380, 1393. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX202011011.htm
[15]	HODAPP N. The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2012, 188(1): 97-99. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0015-x
[16]	PATEL G, MANDAL A, CHOUDHARY S, et al. Plan evaluation indices: a journey of evolution[J]. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2020, 25(3): 336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.002
[17]	林权, 庄明, 曹阳, 等. 左乳腺癌保乳术后不同放疗方式的剂量学比较[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2019, 27(24): 4455-4458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2019.24.032
[18]	刘洋, 冯革, 张振勇, 等. VMAT和IMRT在早期右侧乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗中的比较剂量学研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(12): 2117-2121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2020.12.027
[19]	柏晗, 侯宇, 李文辉, 等. 保乳术后全乳腺放疗容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)物理计划的设计[J]. 医疗装备, 2018, 31(1): 9-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2018.01.005
[20]	陈济鸿, 张秀春, 陆军, 等. 两种计划系统在乳腺癌患者调强放疗中的剂量学研究[J]. 医疗装备, 2016, 29(11): 1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2016.11.001
[21]	SANTOS A M C, MARCU L G, WONG C M, et al. Risk estimation of second primary cancers after breast radiotherapy[J]. Acta Oncol, 2016, 55(11): 1331-1337. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1185150
[22]	CHUNG Y, YOON H I, KIM Y B, et al. Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients who received radiotherapy using the partially wide tangent technique after breast conserving surgery[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2012, 15(3): 337. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.3.337
[23]	DARBY S C, EWERTZ M, MCGALE P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(11): 987-998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825
[24]	TAYLOR C W, KIRBY A M. Cardiac side-effects from breast cancer radiotherapy[J]. Clin Oncol, 2015, 27(11): 621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.007
[25]	MGE A, ZIOUCHE A, POUREL N, et al. Radiation-related heart toxicity[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2011, 15(6/7): 495-503. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21885320
[26]	孙海涛, 杨瑞杰, 江萍, 等. 乳腺癌保乳术后容积旋转调强和切线野调强放疗的剂量学比较[J]. 北京大学学报: 医学版, 2018, 50(1): 188-192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.032
[27]	蒙渡, 刘锐, 王书文, 等. 早期左侧乳腺癌保乳术后IMRT与VMAT两种放射治疗技术的剂量学研究[J]. 西部医学, 2016, 28(11): 1535-1539. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2016.11.014
[28]	赵金, 吴文安, 廖娟, 等. 保乳术后全乳照射VMAT与IMRT的计量学比较[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(9): 1427-1429. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.09.027

[1]	WANG Longlong, XU Shudi, MA Hongge, MA Jingwen, WANG Jingjian, YANG Shuhan, ZHANG Min. A research on cerebral limbic-cortical circuit in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with depression[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(11): 38-41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20215107
[2]	WANG Yingge, XU Yijun, TAO Chunhua, LIU bin, YANG Ming, WANG Zhaoxia, LIANG Jingyan, TANG Tieyu. Effects of clinical pathway combined with impedance exercise on cognitive dysfunction, motor function and quality of life in elderly patients with ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(6): 6-9. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213211
[3]	QIU Jie, SUN Hu, XIE Shuang, ZHANG Caicai, CHEN Lei. Effect of propofol on cognitive function and expression of hippocampal neuronal γ-aminobutyric acid receptor in aged rats[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 45-48, 51. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201604
[4]	WANG Yacong, LI Shuli, CHEN Xiaoming. Clinical research of lumbar and epidural anesthesia on analgesia efficacy in puerperae with prolonged incubation delivery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (15): 92-94. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201715025
[5]	XIAO Jing, HUANG Yuanyuan, JIANG Side, ZOU Yaobing, YAN Zongren, TANG Mingshan. Influence of early application of citalopram on motor function recovery of patients with acute cortical cerebral infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (7): 5-7. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201707002
[6]	HE Jie, DING Junli, SUN Zhihua, ZENG Xiaoyan, HE Min. Application of blink reflex combined with brain stem auditory evoked potential examinations in diagnosis of posterior-circulation ischemia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (13): 15-18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201613005
[7]	Hou Le, Yan Keli, Lin Zheng, Zhou Wan, Kong Wenjun. The application of somatosensory evoked potential stimulator in cancerous pain nursing assessment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (12): 36-37,41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201412012
[8]	LIANG Junhua, LI Juan. Influence of stepwise nursing on motor capacity and quality of life in stroke patients with hemiplegia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (2): 37-39. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201402014
[9]	LIU Zhi-gang, LUO Wei-yao, HE Yun. Diagnostic value of brainstem auditory evoked potential in brainstem encephalitis associated with hand foot and mouth disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2012, (5): 61-62,68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2012.05.020
[10]	WANG Yu, CHENG Peng, XUE Rong-liang, ZHANG Ling, ZHOU Lei-ming, ZHAO Jun, ZHAO Shu-li. The effect of electroencephalogram burst suppression in auditory evoked potential index monitoring to body[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2011, (23): 40-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2011.23.013

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (531) PDF downloads (47)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Dosimetric differences of different radiation modes based on Monaco in postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Dosimetric differences of different radiation modes based on Monaco in postoperative intensity modulated radiotherapy of patients with left breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content