SONG Xiaoqian, ZANG Qingshu. Analgesic and sedative effects of different femoral nerve blocks of patients with hip fracture at operative position[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 91-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013026
Citation: SONG Xiaoqian, ZANG Qingshu. Analgesic and sedative effects of different femoral nerve blocks of patients with hip fracture at operative position[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 91-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013026

Analgesic and sedative effects of different femoral nerve blocks of patients with hip fracture at operative position

More Information
  • Received Date: April 25, 2020
  • Objective To compare the analgesic and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine combined with 0.375% ropivacaine and their use alone in femoral nerve block for patients with hip fracture at operative position. Methods Totally 150 hip fracture patients with internal fixation were randomly divided into three groups, with 50 cases in each group. Group A was treated with 0.375% ropivacaine for femoral nerve block, group B was treated with intravenous injection of 0.2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, and group C was treated with 0.2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.375% ropivacaine for femoral nerve block. The mean arterial pressure(MAP), heart rate(HR)and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2)were compared among the three groups at the time points of entering the room(T0), before taking position(T1), taking position(T2), and at the end of spinal anesthesia(T3). The analgesic effect [assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)] and sedative effect [assessed by modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation(OAA/S)] were compared among the three groups. Adverse reactions of the three groups were recorded. Results Levels of MAP and HR at T1, T2 and T3 were significantly lower than those at T0 in the group A and the group C(P<0.05), levels of MAP and HR at T1 and T3 were significantly lower than those at T0 in the group B(P<0.05), and MAP at T2 in the group B was significantly higher than that in the group A and the group C(P<0.05). The - levels of HR at T3 in the group B and the group C were significantly lower than that in the group A (P<0.05). The levels of HR at T1 and T2 in the group C were significantly lower than that in the group A and the group B(P<0.05). The VAS scores at T2 in the group A and the group C were significantly lower than those at T0 in the same groups and at T2 in the group B(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the group A and the group C(P>0.05). The OAA/S scores at T1 in the group B and the group C were significantly higher than that at T0 in the same groups and at T1 in the group B(P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the group B and the group C(P>0.05). No adverse reactions were observed in the group A, but there were 1 case(2.00%)with nausea and vomiting in the group B and 1 case(2.00%)with vertigo in the group C. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine combined with 0.375% ropivacaine has exact sedative and analgesic effects at taking position in hip fracture patients with intraspinal anesthesia, which has less influence on hemodynamics and fewer adverse reactions.
  • BELOOSESKY Y, HERSHKOVITZ A, GUZ A, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term mortality of occult hip fracture elderly patients[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(4): 343-347.
    冯明利, 沈惠良, 雍宜民, 等. 人工关节置换治疗老年脑血管意外偏瘫侧股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2004(4): 199-202.
    BROX W T, ROBERTS K C, TAKSALI S, et al. The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons evidence-based guideline on management of hip fractures in the elderly[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(14): 1196-1199.
    BASQUES B A, TOY J O, BOHL D D, et al. General compared with spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(6): 455-461.
    祁莉英. 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者髋部手术中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2009, 31(13): 1636-1638.
    RODGERS A, WALKER N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2000, 321(7275): 1493-1498.
    谢丽金. 超声引导神经阻滞复合连续硬膜外麻醉在高龄患者髋部骨折手术的应用[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2016, 37(20): 2547-2549.
    朋立超, 吴贵龙, 仇建华. 股神经阻滞用于高龄股骨颈骨折患者超前镇痛的临床研究[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2007, 27(4): 343-344.
    MERBOTH M K, BARNASON S. Managing pain: the fifth vital sign[J]. Nurs Clin North Am, 2000, 35(2): 375-383.
    朱红花, 方浩. 老年全髋置换术患者不同术后镇痛方法的疗效比较[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2017, 23(4): 294-297.
    张志军, 贾若, 段立鹏, 等. 髂筋膜单点与多点阻滞用于股骨颈骨折患者行椎管内麻醉摆放体位及术后镇痛效果的临床比较[J]. 北京医学, 2016, 38(10): 1111-1113.
    景颜, 陈丽, 尹芸生. 股神经阻滞和舒芬太尼用于髋部骨折麻醉前镇痛效果的比较[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2016, 18(s1): 15-18.
    JADON A, KEDIA S K, DIXIT S, et al. Comparative evaluation of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for positioning during spinal anaesthesia in surgery of femur fracture[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2014, 58(6): 705-708.
    SANDRE A, THOMPSON C, MCLEOD S L, et al. MP033: The use of femoral nerve blocks in the emergency department for hip fracture patients[J]. CJEM, 2016, 18(S1): S77-S84.
    RIDDELL M, OSPINA M, HOLROYD-LEDUC J M. Use of femoral nerve blocks to manage hip fracture pain among older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review[J]. CJEM, 2016, 18(4): 245-252.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LI Binbin. Application of PDCA cycle management in emergency treatment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (10): 94-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201810027
    [2]HE Chunyan, LIU Hong, XIANG Wenjuan, LIU Huaping. Application effect of PDCA circulation management in nursing safety and quality improvement of operation room[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (16): 106-108,112. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201716034
    [3]YE Jing, YANG Qian, LIU Zuoyan. The effect of PDCA circulation nursing management mode in nursing of patients undergoing cervical vertebrae operation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (14): 85-87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201714025
    [4]TANG Tianjuan, BIAN Zhaoxing, WAN Rong. Effect of PDCA cycle nursing intervention for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (12): 145-146,149. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201712045
    [5]XIE Fang, SHAO Hong. Application of PDCA cycle management in improvement of nursing quality of patients with stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (6): 39-41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706012
    [6]CHEN Haiyan, ZENG Deyan. Effect of PDCA circulation mode nursing management on improvement of emotions in senile colorectal cancer patients and their family members[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (10): 97-99. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201610031
    [7]ZHANG Xiaojun. Application of PDCA cycle management model in improvement of quality of obstetric care[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (Z1): 213-214.
    [8]LUO Fengyun. Application research on PDCA cycle management mode in respiratory failure patients treated by mechanical ventilation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (8): 18-20. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201508006
    [9]HU Jifang, XIAO Xiangjuan, XIA Honghui, HUANG Chenchen, LI Chunchun. Evaluation of PDCA nursing model in children with mycoplasma pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (22): 92-94. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201422028
    [10]ZHENG Yongqun, TAO Yanzhi, LUO Meiyan, LEI Da, YUAN Yan. Effect of PDCA cycle management on nursing quality management in operation rooms[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (14): 175-177. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201314065
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 陈少清,谢锦銮. 危险性积分加量化评估对上消化道出血并高血压的分析. 心血管病防治知识. 2023(05): 52-54+57 .
    2. 景艳艳,贾海妮. 分级护理干预在上消化道出血患者中的应用效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(10): 151-153 .
    3. 李江虹,黄国进,虞艳,成翠娥,曾远程. RDW、Hb、GAS与ANVUGIB患者GBS、AIMS65评分的关系及预测再出血的价值. 中国医师杂志. 2022(08): 1257-1260 .
    4. 杨莹莹. CAT量表评分指导下的分级护理在老年COPD患者中的应用效果. 现代养生. 2022(23): 2066-2069 .
    5. 丁娟,马志杰,沙嫚. 上消化道出血病人消化内镜治疗后再出血风险预测模型的构建. 全科护理. 2021(33): 4746-4749 .
    6. 刘荣钰. Rockall危险性积分导向下的分级护理在ANVUGIB患者中的应用. 国际医药卫生导报. 2020(02): 279-281 .
    7. 崔锡兰. 分级护理在ANVUGIB患者中的干预效果. 中国卫生标准管理. 2020(06): 157-158 .
    8. 陈金辉. 延续护理对急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血患者再出血率及医护遵从性的影响. 当代护士(上旬刊). 2020(05): 45-48 .
    9. 陈晓美. 探讨上消化道出血患者的护理对策, 并观察护理的临床效果. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2020(11): 122 .
    10. 张秀兰. 分级护理干预护理后上消化道出血患者再出血率分析. 甘肃科技. 2020(14): 127-129 .
    11. 尧霞秀. 临床分级护理在急性上消化道出血患者护理中的应用. 基层医学论坛. 2019(06): 767+813 .
    12. 徐泽静. 分级护理对消化道出血患者血液指标及再出血率的影响. 口岸卫生控制. 2019(02): 43-44+49 .
    13. 郭艳,夏洪芬,张世萍,罗金容. 基于Rockall评分系统的护理干预对急性上消化道出血患者内镜介入治疗预后的影响. 广西医科大学学报. 2019(06): 1034-1037 .
    14. 徐明. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用效果. 中国现代药物应用. 2019(14): 193-195 .
    15. 马秀云,申月芹. 临床分级护理对急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的干预效果. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2019(27): 103+113 .
    16. 周贺. 优质护理对老年肺结核患者用药依从性的影响分析. 中国医药指南. 2019(33): 238 .
    17. 冯丽均. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用研究. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2018(15): 6-7 .
    18. 商娜. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用效果评价. 中国医药指南. 2018(31): 199-200 .
    19. 周艳丽. 优质护理干预用于上消化道出血患者中的效果研究. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2017(39): 36+46 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (559) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(22)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return