LIU Yanzhang, ZHENG Xueli. Influence of phacoemulsification with 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm corneal incisions on postoperative corneal refractive power and astigmatism[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 76-79. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022022
Citation: LIU Yanzhang, ZHENG Xueli. Influence of phacoemulsification with 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm corneal incisions on postoperative corneal refractive power and astigmatism[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 76-79. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022022

Influence of phacoemulsification with 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm corneal incisions on postoperative corneal refractive power and astigmatism

More Information
  • Received Date: July 20, 2020
  • Available Online: December 21, 2020
  • Published Date: December 02, 2020
  • Objective To explore the influence of phacoemulsification with 2.2 mm and 3.0 mm corneal incisions on postoperative corneal refractive power and astigmatism. Methods A total of 120 patients(120 eyes)who underwent cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in our hospital were selected, and were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 60 cases(60 eyes)in each group. Patients in the observation group received 2.2 mm corneal incision phacoemulsification and those in the control group received 3.0 mm corneal incision. The uncorrected visual acuity and the best positive visual acuity before operation and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the operation were checked up, and the Jaffe/Clayman analysis method was used to observe the changes of vector change(SIA)value and total SIA value of astigmatism on the anterior and posterior corneal surface of the two groups at different time points. Results The uncorrected visual acuity at 1 day and 1 week after operation and the best corrected visual acuity at 1 day, 1 week and 1 month after operation in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05); compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the uncorrected visual acuity before operation, 1 month and 3 months after operation, and the best corrected visual acuity before operation and 3 months after operation between the observation group and control group(P>0.05). The- SIA values of the anterior corneal surface and posterior corneal surface of the observation group were lower than those of the control group at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery, but there were no significant differences between the groups(P>0.05). The corneal total SIA value and posterior surface SIA value at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months in the two groups showed significant differences when compared with those of first postoperative day(P<0.05). SIA values of the anterior corneal surface at 1 month and 1 day after surgery showed significant differences in the observation group compared with its value in the first postoperative day(P<0.05), and SIA value of the anterior corneal surface at only 3 months after surgery in the control group showed significant significance compared with its value at 1 day after surgery(P<0.05). Conclusion Phacoemulsification with 2.2 mm corneal incision combined with implantation of artificial lens is more stable in corneal incision conditions than 3.0 mm corneal incision, and has better refractive stability in the early postoperative period. In the long run, refractive power and astigmatism between the two surgical incisions have less difference.
  • 朱敏, 于佳明, 刘扬. 我国居民白内障视力残疾的疾病负担分析[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(23): 85-87.
    刘卫华, 王军. 同轴微切口与传统小切口超声乳化术的临床疗效及术后并发症对比分析[J]. 眼科新进展, 2019, 39(9): 874-876.
    袁媛, 彭华琮, 陈雅琼. 飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统白内障手术联合Toric人工晶状体植入术治疗长眼轴白内障患者的临床疗效比较[J]. 眼科新进展, 2020, 40(2): 144-147.
    DAY A C, GORE D M, BUNCE C, et al. Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 7(7): CD010735.
    李保江. 2.2 mm微切口超声乳化白内障手术的临床疗效观察[J]. 眼科新进展, 2014, 34(6): 564-566.
    KONGSAP P. Central corneal thickness changes following manual small incision cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification for white cataract[J]. Rom J Ophthalmol, 2019, 63(1): 61-67.
    AMMOUS I, BOUAYED E, MABROUK S, et al. Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery: Anatomic and functional results[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2017, 40(6): 460-466.
    林海波, 李雯霖, 卓晓, 等. 不同切口超声乳化术对年龄相关性白内障患者角膜内皮和泪膜功能的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(7): 1257-1260.
    张雪, 闫欢欢, 艾华, 等. 白内障超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(14): 86-89.
    CAVALLINI G M, FORNASARI E, DE MARIA M, et al. Bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared to standard bimanual phacoemulsification: a case-control study[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2019, 29(6): 629-635.
    DAY A C, SMITH P R, TANG H L, et al. Surgical efficiency in femtosecond laser cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a case-control study[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(2): e018478.
    王静, 莫纯坚. 1.8 mm同轴微切口超声乳化白内障吸出术对角膜内皮细胞的损伤及修复研究[J]. 眼科新进展, 2015, 35(4): 377-380.
    WANG J, SU F, WANG Y, et al. Intra and post-operative complications observed with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 177-182.
    刘祎, 刘永民, 刘彦利, 等. 白内障超声乳化患者结膜囊细菌学特征和药物敏感性分析[J]. 眼科新进展, 2020, 40(06): 574-577.
    李帅飞, 陈彬川, 李佳佳. 1.8 mm同轴微切口超声乳化白内障手术联合玻璃体切割术的应用[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(1): 59-61

    , 64.
    李博, 张素华, 张哲, 等. 2.2 mm透明角膜切15飞秒激光辅助白内障超声乳化手术术源性散光的临床研究[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2016, 18(11): 654-659.
    CHLASTA-TWARDZIK E, NOWINSKA A, WYLEGAŁA E. Comparison of the selected parameters of the anterior segment of the eye between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, microincision cataract surgery, and conventional phacoemulsification: a case-control study[J]. Medicine(Madr), 2019, 98(52): e18340.
    朱琦, 何华, 王乾. 两种不同人工晶状体植入术对老年白内障术后视觉及对比敏感度的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(21): 229-231.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Xinzi, QIU Yibo, DENG Yu, YU Siming. Research progress of treatment of vascular calcification in patients with maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(22): 144-148. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221784
    [2]WU Guangbiao. Effect of hemodialysis combined with hemoperfusion in the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(10): 110-112. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202010028
    [3]GU Jing, ZHAN GHui. Effects of high-flux hemodialysis combined with alprostadil in treating chronic renal failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, (1): 85-88,92. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201901023
    [4]ZHANG Ying. Effect of predictive nursing in prevention of noscomial infection in diabetic nephropathy patients with hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (6): 36-39. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201806011
    [5]HE Pinghong, JIANG Wenyong, SU Fengxian, HU Shanshan, DA Jingjing, ZHA Yan. Clinical effect of high flux hemodialysis foRAECOPD patients complicated with renal insufficiency[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (9): 24-27. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201709006
    [6]MIAO Changxian, XIE Xianmin, CONG Zhihua. Influence of low calcium dialysate calcium on calcium and phosphorus metabolism and parathyroid hormone in patients with maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (3): 29-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201703009
    [7]TANG Yumei, XU Jixian, LI Gang, WANG Yuan. Influence of high flux hemodialysis on serum β2-microglobulin and parathyroid hormone[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (7): 74-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201507021
    [8]Comparison between on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis for middle-molecule solues removal[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (19): 182-184. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201419063
    [9]TANG Xiaojun. Related risk factors of cognitive dysfunction in patients with maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (15): 158-159,162. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201415055
    [10]YANG Biyu. Preventive effect of nursing intervention on hypoglycemia of hemodialysis in diabetic nephropathy patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (12): 8-10. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201412003

Catalog

    Article views (449) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return