LUO Jun, LI Qingfu, CHEN Changqun, FAN Bo, LI Zhaoxing. Value of full-field digital mammography combined with digital breast tomography in detection of breast lesions and breast calcification[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 5-9. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212075
Citation: LUO Jun, LI Qingfu, CHEN Changqun, FAN Bo, LI Zhaoxing. Value of full-field digital mammography combined with digital breast tomography in detection of breast lesions and breast calcification[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 5-9. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212075

Value of full-field digital mammography combined with digital breast tomography in detection of breast lesions and breast calcification

More Information
  • Received Date: May 18, 2021
  • Available Online: December 03, 2021
  • Published Date: November 27, 2021
  •   Objective   To explore the diagnostic values of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, digital breast tomography (DBT) alone and their combination in the diagnosis of benign or malignant breast lesions and breast calcification.
      Methods   A total of 280 patients with suspected breast lesions were selected as research objects, and all patients received FFDM and DBT examinations. The diagnostic accuracy of FFDM or DBT alone and their combination in the diagnosis of benign or malignant breast lesions and breast calcification was compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of FFDM, DBT and FFDM combined with DBT for breast lesions.
      Results   The positive prediction value of FFDM was 63.53% and the negative prediction value was 85.21%; the positive prediction value of DBT was 78.75% and the negative prediction value was 90.80%; the positive prediction value of DBT combined with FFDM was 92.50%, and the negative prediction value was 97.13%. The accuracy rates of FFDM combined with DBT in diagnosis of benign, malignant breast lesions and breast calcification were higher than that of DBT and FFDM alone, and the accuracy rates of DBT in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions and breast calcification were higher than those of FFDM (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) of FFDM, DBT and FFDM combined with DBT in early prediction of breast lesions were 0.753, 0.850 and 0.951, respectively.
      Conclusion   DBT combined with FFDM have higher diagnostic value for breast lesions, effectively distinguish benign and malignant lesions, and increase the detection rate of breast calcification.
  • [1]
    程兰兰, 刘斌, 胡汉金, 等. 数字乳腺断层摄影与常规影像学检查对乳腺肿块型病变诊断的对比研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 1637-1641.
    [2]
    许洪芬, 林青, 苏晓慧, 等. 数字乳腺断层合成摄影对影像表现为不典型乳腺纤维腺瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2019, 27(4): 267-272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2019.04.007
    [3]
    李巧琳, 谭谆. 超声检查和乳腺X线摄影及数字乳腺断层摄影对乳腺肿块的应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2020, 30(5): 882-885.
    [4]
    汤伟, 杨孟, 高毅, 等. 数字乳腺断层融合X线摄影术前评估乳腺癌肿块大小的效能对比研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(11): 813-818.
    [5]
    张原生, 王晓成, 王建明. 全视野数字化乳腺摄影结合三维数字乳腺断层摄影对致密型乳腺肿块的诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2019, 31(8): 525-529. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2019.08.005
    [6]
    吕晓虹, 刘宁, 李琦, 等. 数字乳腺断层摄影对致密型乳腺肿块的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(39): 3110-3113. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.39.014
    [7]
    杨彩仙, 赵宏光, 刘慧, 等. 乳腺癌数字化X线三维断层摄影肿块边缘征象及其与病理学指标的相关性[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2019, 31(1): 16-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2019.01.004
    [8]
    安琪, 李晶. 比较超声与数字乳腺断层摄影在致密型乳腺中的应用价值[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(4): 545-549.
    [9]
    周蜀川, 张雪琴, 王紫薇, 等. 探讨数字乳腺三维断层融合与X线摄影在致密型乳腺诊断中的剂量差异及临床运用价值[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2020, 35(4): 75-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2020.04.020
    [10]
    位寒, 刘鸿利, 王思奇, 等. 数字乳腺三维断层摄影及全数字化乳腺摄影对乳腺疾病诊断价值对比的初步研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(1): 171-176.
    [11]
    HE X J, HUANG J X, CHEN G B, et al. Clinical value of 99mTc-octreotide scintigraphy and planar X-ray mammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer[J]. Curr Med Imaging Rev, 2018, 14(6): 976-980. doi: 10.2174/1573405613666170405144425
    [12]
    葛继元, 钱超颖, 罗一烽. 钼靶X线摄影联合增强磁共振成像在乳腺导管原位癌诊断中的价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(8): 18-22. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202008005
    [13]
    袁凤玲, 王静静, 王艳鹏, 等. 自动乳腺全容积成像与超声弹性成像对乳腺肿块的诊断价值比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(4): 440-443. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.04.015
    [14]
    蒋慧琴, 王博霖, 马岭, 等. 一种双视图信息融合的乳腺肿块自动检测算法[J]. 郑州大学学报: 理学版, 2020, 52(4): 28-36.
    [15]
    边甜甜, 吴增杰, 林青, 等. 数字乳腺断层摄影诊断致密型乳腺无钙化肿块[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(4): 553-557.
    [16]
    魏瑶, 芦春花, 李岩. 全视野数字化乳腺摄影及数字乳腺断层摄影诊断致密型乳腺内病变[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(12): 1815-1819.
    [17]
    王智慧, 卢国雄, 颜卓恒, 等. 全数字化乳腺摄影、数字乳腺断层摄影与DCE-MRI对乳腺肿物诊断效能的比较[J]. 中山大学学报: 医学科学版, 2020, 41(4): 603-610.
    [18]
    ZHANG H X, SUN Z Q, CHENG Y G, et al. A pilot study of radiomics technology based on X-ray mammography in patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. J X Ray Sci Technol, 2019, 27(3): 485-492. doi: 10.3233/XST-180488
  • Related Articles

    [1]HE Peng, LI Yongfei, WU Yiyun, REN Xiaomei, BIAN Weihe, YAO Chang. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection versus open resection in treatment of breast masses with calcification[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213302
    [2]SONG Qian, LIU Jingping, FENG Huamei, NIE Weiqi, WANG Yang. Correlations between pathological features of intraductal carcinoma of the breast and mammography as well as examination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(13): 28-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210361
    [3]GE Jiyuan, QIAN Chaoying, LUO Yifeng. Value of mammography combined with enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(8): 18-22. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202008005
    [4]LING Li, JIANG Jinjin, BIAN Fangyun, JI Yaping. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full field digital mammography in the diagnosis of distortion of breast structure[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 32-35. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005009
    [5]ZHANG Chao, LUO Ruizhen, LI Jingyan, CHEN Zhiqiang, WANG Yiping. Application of automated breast volume scanner in diagnosis of breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (23): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201623020
    [6]SUN Hongyue. Diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging in benign and malignant lesion of breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (19): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201519022
    [7]WU Chucheng, PENG Weiqiang, HUANG Yukang, CHEN Shuru, FENG Decai. Application of Mammotome minimally invasive biopsy system in diagnosis and treatment of patietns with nonpalpable breast lesions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (3): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201503030
    [8]ZHANG Chuanyun, CHEN Guoqing. Application of mammography molybdenum target combined with ultrasonography in early screening of breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (3): 30-32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201503008
    [9]LYU Jianxin, SHI Min, PAN Bo, WANG Xiaojun, DAI Luxian, YANG Xiaohong. Application of EnCor vacuum-assisted biopsy system in the diagnosis and treatment for breast lesions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (9): 108-111. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201409033
    [10]JIA Zhi-dong, KONG Ai-ping, ZHOU Ming-tao. Value of full-field digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer in early stage[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2011, (1): 123-124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2011.01.039
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 李志民,肖刚,吴亚男. 基于ROC分析全数字化乳腺摄影技术对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断. 河南医学高等专科学校学报. 2024(02): 184-187 .
    2. 余建承,徐建萍,孙晶晶. 数字乳腺三维断层摄影联合FFDM对乳腺病变的诊断价值分析. 浙江创伤外科. 2024(04): 758-761 .
    3. 张祺荣. 全数字乳腺摄影(FFDM)做对比并探讨数字乳腺断层融合X线摄影(DBT)在乳腺癌诊断中的临床应用价值. 现代医用影像学. 2023(03): 479-483 .
    4. 石宇芳,卞红丽. 3.0T磁共振动态增强成像在乳腺微钙化病变诊断中的临床应用效果. 影像研究与医学应用. 2023(23): 143-145 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (295) PDF downloads (14) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return